OCCOM BILL wrote:"J´engage ma fidelité au drapeau des États-Unis d´Amérique et à la République qu'il répresente, une nation sous Dieu, indivisible, avec liberté et justice pour tous."
"Yo prometo lealtad a la bandera de los estados Unidos de America, y a la Republica que representa, una Nacion bajo Dios, entera, con libertad y justicia para todos."
" Ich gelobe Treue auf die Fahne der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, auf die Republik, die eine Nation unter Gott ist, vereinigt durch Freiheit und Gerechtigkeit fur alle."
"Ik Zweer Trouw aan de vlag van de Verenigde Staten van Amerika en aan de Republiek waarvoor zij staat, één Natie onder God, ondeelbaar, met vrijheid en gerechtigheid voor allen"
" Eu prometo lealdade à bandeira dos Estados Unidos da América, e à República a qual representa, uma Nação abaixo de Deus, indivisível, com liberdade e justiça para todos."
![http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/7938/aaahindipledge27is.jpg](http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/7938/aaahindipledge27is.jpg)
Instinctively, I feel that one who is truly confident about that what makes him (his family, his country, etc) great does not need to shout it out from the roofs (or the flagpoles).
That I suppose, is mostly a question of style; a sensitivity to the way people express themselves, different behaviours being appreciated differently in different places. I tend to appreciate modesty rather than loud pride -- and tend to assume true self-confidence more in those who are outwardly modest than in those who are loudly proud.
I guess that means that there
is a question of substance beyond the sensitivity of style, then. Those who are already "shouting", even when you dont know them yet - the person who waves his flag in your face before you've even talked - appears to be little ready to
listen, and certainly doesn't seem to be inviting an outsider to bring in his own, alternative, point of view. "We know we are the best in the world of all things possible"; that is the message an outsider is likely to get from persistent flag-waving; what use, then, is trying to enter a dialogue still? They think they know everything already anyway.
Its like with Christians, I suppose. There are those who are deeply and most principledly Christian in their beliefs, but believe personally, as a relationship between them and God; and there are those who feel the need to wave their cross, put up billboards and posters of how great God is and put up bumper stickers on how Jesus saves you. I appreciate that they are happy and so filled with enthusiasm that they just cant help sharing, but the message they send out is that, in any case, you can forget about them being eager or ready to listen to alternatives, to other people's perspectives.
Isnt Pride one of the deadly sins?