Why do you still support Bush?

Walter Hinteler wrote:

RexRed wrote:
How many "elected" kings willingly give up their power after 8 years?

He does it willingly, really? Thanks for that info.

RexRed wrote:
Question,
Who is going to control all of these socialists clones drone puppet people in this utopian dream world of the radical far left? A pauper?

Voters. Parliaments. Constituional courts. Etc etc, what ever there is in democracratic countries.

Oh you mean the aristocracy?

0 Replies

Socialism robs the people of the pursuit of happiness.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Oh you mean the aristocracy?

Did I made so many typos this time? Sorry.
I wanted actually to write:

Voters. Parliaments. Constituional courts. Etc etc, what ever there is in democracratic countries.

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

RexRed wrote:

Oh you mean the aristocracy?

Did I made so many typos this time? Sorry.
I wanted actually to write:

Voters. Parliaments. Constituional courts. Etc etc, what ever there is in democracratic countries.

I try to focus on what is said and not how it was spelt. :wink:

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

I try to focus on what is said and not how it was spelt.

Then, you have either hearing difficulties and a tremendous lack of knowledge.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Seems to me that Frank has got it right. This time. :wink:

I knew if I just kept trying....

You are still wrong...

What rule books says "rebels" have to be motivated by hate? They identified themselves with freedom and liberators from oppression. Freedom does not contain hate but liberation from hate.

Hate is a weak motivator, love is greater.

So now you are both wrong.

The USSR tried to rule with fear motivation and look where it got them?

You apparently stopped studying history in the 1700's...

You still do not understand what I wrote, Rex.

Get your brain fixed...and then we can talk. (Talk to your god about it!)

I read exactly what you wrote;

You implied that our country was built on the hatred of a king. I disagree, it was built on the desire (love) for freedom.

Again it is you Frank who has twisted the situation to fit your ideology.

Get your fukin' brain fixed, Rex...and then argue.

WHETHER OR NOT "LOVE OF FREEDOM" PLAYED A PART IN THEIR MOTIVATION IS NOT FUKIN' GERMAINE....BECAUSE I WAS REPLYING TO McG'S ASSERTION THAT THEIR MOTIVATION WAS LOVE OF COUNTRY...AND I WAS POINTING OUT THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY INVOLVED WAS ENGLAND. THE UNITED STATES DID NOT EXIST. IT WAS NOT LOVE OF ENGLAND THAT CAUSED THEM TO REBEL.

JESUS H. KEERIST.

GET A BRAIN, WILL YA!

0 Replies

Walter Hinteler wrote:

RexRed wrote:

I try to focus on what is said and not how it was spelt.

Then, you have either hearing difficulties and a tremendous lack of knowledge.

You are a master of the understatement, Walter.

0 Replies

Frank Apisa wrote:

RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Seems to me that Frank has got it right. This time. :wink:

I knew if I just kept trying....

You are still wrong...

What rule books says "rebels" have to be motivated by hate? They identified themselves with freedom and liberators from oppression. Freedom does not contain hate but liberation from hate.

Hate is a weak motivator, love is greater.

So now you are both wrong.

The USSR tried to rule with fear motivation and look where it got them?

You apparently stopped studying history in the 1700's...

You still do not understand what I wrote, Rex.

Get your brain fixed...and then we can talk. (Talk to your god about it!)

I read exactly what you wrote;

You implied that our country was built on the hatred of a king. I disagree, it was built on the desire (love) for freedom.

Again it is you Frank who has twisted the situation to fit your ideology.

Get your fukin' brain fixed, Rex...and then argue.

WHETHER OR NOT "LOVE OF FREEDOM" PLAYED A PART IN THEIR MOTIVATION IS NOT FUKIN' GERMAINE....BECAUSE I WAS REPLYING TO McG'S ASSERTION THAT THEIR MOTIVATION WAS LOVE OF COUNTRY...AND I WAS POINTING OUT THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY INVOLVED WAS ENGLAND. THE UNITED STATES DID NOT EXIST. IT WAS NOT LOVE OF ENGLAND THAT CAUSED THEM TO REBEL.

JESUS H. KEERIST.

GET A BRAIN, WILL YA!

Yes that's right. The colonialists who supported separation from Britain were only about 30% of the whole, originally. Set could tell ya.

0 Replies

Thanks Mc Tag.

With Rex...sometimes you gotta keep on 'splainin' and keep on 'splainin'. He is not the sharpest tool in the shed!

0 Replies

Frank Apisa wrote:

RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Seems to me that Frank has got it right. This time. :wink:

I knew if I just kept trying....

You are still wrong...

What rule books says "rebels" have to be motivated by hate? They identified themselves with freedom and liberators from oppression. Freedom does not contain hate but liberation from hate.

Hate is a weak motivator, love is greater.

So now you are both wrong.

The USSR tried to rule with fear motivation and look where it got them?

You apparently stopped studying history in the 1700's...

You still do not understand what I wrote, Rex.

Get your brain fixed...and then we can talk. (Talk to your god about it!)

I read exactly what you wrote;

You implied that our country was built on the hatred of a king. I disagree, it was built on the desire (love) for freedom.

Again it is you Frank who has twisted the situation to fit your ideology.

Get your fukin' brain fixed, Rex...and then argue.

WHETHER OR NOT "LOVE OF FREEDOM" PLAYED A PART IN THEIR MOTIVATION IS NOT FUKIN' GERMAINE....BECAUSE I WAS REPLYING TO McG'S ASSERTION THAT THEIR MOTIVATION WAS LOVE OF COUNTRY...AND I WAS POINTING OUT THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY INVOLVED WAS ENGLAND. THE UNITED STATES DID NOT EXIST. IT WAS NOT LOVE OF ENGLAND THAT CAUSED THEM TO REBEL.

JESUS H. KEERIST.

GET A BRAIN, WILL YA!

"Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!"

Daniel Webster

Frank you happen to be arguing with someone who was raised in Maine history.

The very first naval battle of the revolutionary war was fought in Machias, Maine. A half hour from where I grew up. Have you ever heard of the "liberty" pole erected long before the Boston tea party? Have you ever heard of crossing the Rubicon as referred to the Rubicon river in Machias Maine? Have you ever heard of Jeremiah O Brian? I am sure you don't even know who he was.

You obviously don't know much about liberty or the revolutionary war. Revolution does not have to be motivated by fear just as love of God does not have to be motivated by fear. Did your mother drop you on your head as an infant Frank?

All you can do is change fonts and say fuk... You have made no point.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Seems to me that Frank has got it right. This time. :wink:

I knew if I just kept trying....

You are still wrong...

What rule books says "rebels" have to be motivated by hate? They identified themselves with freedom and liberators from oppression. Freedom does not contain hate but liberation from hate.

Hate is a weak motivator, love is greater.

So now you are both wrong.

The USSR tried to rule with fear motivation and look where it got them?

You apparently stopped studying history in the 1700's...

You still do not understand what I wrote, Rex.

Get your brain fixed...and then we can talk. (Talk to your god about it!)

I read exactly what you wrote;

You implied that our country was built on the hatred of a king. I disagree, it was built on the desire (love) for freedom.

Again it is you Frank who has twisted the situation to fit your ideology.

Get your fukin' brain fixed, Rex...and then argue.

WHETHER OR NOT "LOVE OF FREEDOM" PLAYED A PART IN THEIR MOTIVATION IS NOT FUKIN' GERMAINE....BECAUSE I WAS REPLYING TO McG'S ASSERTION THAT THEIR MOTIVATION WAS LOVE OF COUNTRY...AND I WAS POINTING OUT THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY INVOLVED WAS ENGLAND. THE UNITED STATES DID NOT EXIST. IT WAS NOT LOVE OF ENGLAND THAT CAUSED THEM TO REBEL.

JESUS H. KEERIST.

GET A BRAIN, WILL YA!

"Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!"

Daniel Webster

Frank you happen to be arguing with someone who was raised in Maine history.

The very first naval battle of the revolutionary war was fought in Machias, Maine. A half hour from where I grew up. Have you ever heard of the "liberty" pole erected long before the Boston tea party? Have you ever heard of crossing the Rubicon as referred to the Rubicon river in Machias Maine? Have you ever heard of Jeremiah O Brian? I am sure you don't even know who he was.

You obviously don't know much about liberty or the revolutionary war. Revolution does not have to be motivated by fear just as love of God does not have to be motivated by fear. Did your mother drop you on your head as an infant Frank?

All you can do is change fonts and say fuk... You have made no point.

You are just plain stupid, Rex.

No wonder you can claim your god does not object to homosexual conduct!

You are just plain stupid!

0 Replies

You are just plain stupid, Rex.

No wonder you can claim your god does not object to homosexual conduct!

You are just plain stupid!

0 Replies

Rex wrote:
Revolution does not have to be motivated by fear just as love of God does not have to be motivated by fear.

ROTFLMAO

0 Replies

Frank Apisa wrote:

RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Seems to me that Frank has got it right. This time. :wink:

I knew if I just kept trying....

You are still wrong...

What rule books says "rebels" have to be motivated by hate? They identified themselves with freedom and liberators from oppression. Freedom does not contain hate but liberation from hate.

Hate is a weak motivator, love is greater.

So now you are both wrong.

The USSR tried to rule with fear motivation and look where it got them?

You apparently stopped studying history in the 1700's...

You still do not understand what I wrote, Rex.

Get your brain fixed...and then we can talk. (Talk to your god about it!)

I read exactly what you wrote;

You implied that our country was built on the hatred of a king. I disagree, it was built on the desire (love) for freedom.

Again it is you Frank who has twisted the situation to fit your ideology.

Get your fukin' brain fixed, Rex...and then argue.

WHETHER OR NOT "LOVE OF FREEDOM" PLAYED A PART IN THEIR MOTIVATION IS NOT FUKIN' GERMAINE....BECAUSE I WAS REPLYING TO McG'S ASSERTION THAT THEIR MOTIVATION WAS LOVE OF COUNTRY...AND I WAS POINTING OUT THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY INVOLVED WAS ENGLAND. THE UNITED STATES DID NOT EXIST. IT WAS NOT LOVE OF ENGLAND THAT CAUSED THEM TO REBEL.

JESUS H. KEERIST.

GET A BRAIN, WILL YA!

"Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!"

Daniel Webster

Frank you happen to be arguing with someone who was raised in Maine history.

The very first naval battle of the revolutionary war was fought in Machias, Maine. A half hour from where I grew up. Have you ever heard of the "liberty" pole erected long before the Boston tea party? Have you ever heard of crossing the Rubicon as referred to the Rubicon river in Machias Maine? Have you ever heard of Jeremiah O Brian? I am sure you don't even know who he was.

You obviously don't know much about liberty or the revolutionary war. Revolution does not have to be motivated by fear just as love of God does not have to be motivated by fear. Did your mother drop you on your head as an infant Frank?

All you can do is change fonts and say fuk... You have made no point.

You are just plain stupid, Rex.

No wonder you can claim your god does not object to homosexual conduct!

You are just plain stupid!

You are a bigot Frank. And you are WRONG AGAIN...

WHAT A BIG MAN Frank

You have to insult my manhood to win an argument.

That is usually due to a little weenie.

JUST because we did not have a "country" does not mean we did not understand liberty and that we did not stand together in solidarity for LIBERTY...

Have you ever heard of the SONS OF LIBERTY?

You are talking out of your ass Frank.

Have you ever wondered why Maine has a pine tree (liberty pole) as their state tree? Figure it out yourself.

Well you can go on thinking your foolishness...

You are still just as incorrect.

"When the Second Continental Congress assembled in Philadelphia in May 1775"

Isn't that is a bit early to have a congress before the revolution was even was fought?

"Give me liberty or give me death."

Patrick Henry

For a country that you paint out as being full of only a bunch of rag tag rebels they had a congress or an independent ruling body separate from that of England. And that was before the revolutionary war was actually started?

You and your goons can roll on the floor all day if you want. It does not make you right.

0 Replies

Let's not forget about Iraq. The very government that we effectively installed in Iraq, as well as the Iraqi people, despise us and want us the hell out. The Bush administration, however, is talking about staying for many years to come. Does anyone else see a disconnect?

IRAQI DISSENSION FROM BUSH ADMINISTRATION: Maliki and other Iraqi officials have publicly dissented from the Bush administration, highlighting Iraqis' frustration with the continued U.S. presence. In recent comments, Maliki said violence against civilians had become a "daily phenomenon" by many troops in the American-led coalition who "do not respect the Iraqi people. ... They crush them with their vehicles and kill them just on suspicion." The Prime Minister also had considered an amnesty for guerrillas who had attacked U.S. troops, "provided they have not been involved in killing Iraqis." Mahmoud al-Mashhadani, speaker of the Iraqi Parliament, recently called the U.S. occupation "butcher's work under the slogan of democracy and human rights and justice" and called for the United States to leave. Iraqi Vice President Tariq al-Hashimi has also personally asked Bush to set a withdrawal date. According to a Jan. poll, 87 percent of Iraqis support a U.S. timetable for withdrawal. American Progress has a plan to redeploy U.S. troops out of Iraq.

-AmericanProgressAction

0 Replies

Here is some more really depressing information on Iraq. For instance, there is a movement to install Islamic law, which will give women status equal to sheep.

PULLING IRAQ APART: The administration will likely use Maliki's visit with Bush today to showcase the political progress of the Iraq. Last week, a senior administration official held a briefing on Maliki's visit and pointed out, "I'd like to put it that this country is trying to pull itself together, it's not trying to pull itself apart. You've seen a lot of solidarity between Sunni and Shia organizations." But in reality, Iraqi government officials see the breakup of Iraq as increasingly possible. "There is serious talk of Baghdad being divided into [Shia] east and [Sunni] west," said one senior government official. A lack of clarity still exists on "key governance questions, including the delineation of powers between the central government and regional government." Despite two national elections and a constitutional referendum last year, Iraq is still rated "not free" by the human rights and democracy organization Freedom House, noting Iraq's "lack of rule of law, widespread human rights abuses, and growing restrictions on religious freedom and the rights of women and minorities." Women's organizations have been fighting against Article 41 of the Iraqi constitution, narrowly approved in an Oct. 2005 referendum, which replaced Iraq's progressive family law with a more conservative one based on Islamic law.

RECONSTRUCTION STILL IN SHAMBLES: At last week's briefing on Maliki's visit, a senior Bush administration official bragged about the "positive developments" the media are ignoring, such as the "highest oil production and export levels since before the war." But production still remains below prewar levels. Additionally, Baghdad has just eight hours of electricity a day, well below its prewar levels of 16-24 hours. Unemployment is the highest in the region -- 30-40 percent -- and one in three Iraqi children suffer from malnutrition. The U.S. Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction found that U.S. mismanagement and incompetence impeded Iraq's reconstruction and the top U.S. government auditor estimated it will take another $50 billion in additional aid to rebuild the country's oil industry and restore electricity generation to prewar levels. Rampant corruption in the Iraqi government has also hindered reconstruction progress, with Iraq still ranked as among the most corrupt countries in the world.

--AmericanProgressAction

0 Replies

Have you ever heard of the "kings forest"?

Have you ever wondered why Maine has a pine tree on their state flag? Have you ever wondered why Maine is called the pine tree state? Have you ever heard of the Margaretta?

NO NO NO

So you are not much of an authority on the revolutionary war.

All of the things I have mentioned happened BEFORE the revolutionary war, the Boston tea party and the inauguration of any president.

You are characterizing events that YOU HAVE NO IDEA ABOUT.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
RexRed wrote:
Frank Apisa wrote:
Intrepid wrote:
Seems to me that Frank has got it right. This time. :wink:

I knew if I just kept trying....

You are still wrong...

What rule books says "rebels" have to be motivated by hate? They identified themselves with freedom and liberators from oppression. Freedom does not contain hate but liberation from hate.

Hate is a weak motivator, love is greater.

So now you are both wrong.

The USSR tried to rule with fear motivation and look where it got them?

You apparently stopped studying history in the 1700's...

You still do not understand what I wrote, Rex.

Get your brain fixed...and then we can talk. (Talk to your god about it!)

I read exactly what you wrote;

You implied that our country was built on the hatred of a king. I disagree, it was built on the desire (love) for freedom.

Again it is you Frank who has twisted the situation to fit your ideology.

Get your fukin' brain fixed, Rex...and then argue.

WHETHER OR NOT "LOVE OF FREEDOM" PLAYED A PART IN THEIR MOTIVATION IS NOT FUKIN' GERMAINE....BECAUSE I WAS REPLYING TO McG'S ASSERTION THAT THEIR MOTIVATION WAS LOVE OF COUNTRY...AND I WAS POINTING OUT THAT THE ONLY COUNTRY INVOLVED WAS ENGLAND. THE UNITED STATES DID NOT EXIST. IT WAS NOT LOVE OF ENGLAND THAT CAUSED THEM TO REBEL.

JESUS H. KEERIST.

GET A BRAIN, WILL YA!

"Liberty and Union, now and for ever, one and inseparable!"

Daniel Webster

Frank you happen to be arguing with someone who was raised in Maine history.

The very first naval battle of the revolutionary war was fought in Machias, Maine. A half hour from where I grew up. Have you ever heard of the "liberty" pole erected long before the Boston tea party? Have you ever heard of crossing the Rubicon as referred to the Rubicon river in Machias Maine? Have you ever heard of Jeremiah O Brian? I am sure you don't even know who he was.

You obviously don't know much about liberty or the revolutionary war. Revolution does not have to be motivated by fear just as love of God does not have to be motivated by fear. Did your mother drop you on your head as an infant Frank?

All you can do is change fonts and say fuk... You have made no point.

You are just plain stupid, Rex.

No wonder you can claim your god does not object to homosexual conduct!

You are just plain stupid!

You are a bigot Frank. And you are WRONG AGAIN...

WHAT A BIG MAN Frank

You have to insult my manhood to win an argument.

That is usually due to a little weenie.

First you talk about my weenie being little...next you'll claim it is too salty.

There's just no pleasing you folks.

Quote:

JUST because we did not have a "country" does not mean we did not understand liberty and that we did not stand together in solidarity for LIBERTY...

Jesus H. Keerist, Rex...are you actually that dumb.

WE WERE NOT DISCUSSING THAT.

Read what was written.

You are so hopeless.

0 Replies

RexRed wrote:

You are a bigot Frank. And you are WRONG AGAIN...

I cannot be "wrong again" because I was not wrong the first time.

Quote:

WHAT A BIG MAN Frank

You have to insult my manhood to win an argument.

That is usually due to a little weenie.

First you talk about my weenie being little...next you'll claim it is too salty.

There's just no pleasing you folks.

Quote:

JUST because we did not have a "country" does not mean we did not understand liberty and that we did not stand together in solidarity for LIBERTY...

Jesus H. Keerist, Rex...WE WERE NOT DISCUSSING THAT.

That has been explained three times now. All you have to do is grow a brain...and you might be able to get it.

Read what was written.

You are so hopeless.

0 Replies

Frank, I have determined from evidence that right-wingers have all gone to moronbush school to learn about "Projection" as their primary learning tool. They all do it, and they'll continue to do it, because they're unable to discuss any issue without their projections.

0 Replies

Why do you still support Bush?

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know