0
   

President Bush: Is He a Liar?

 
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 06:41 am
Bernie....

This starts with some lies of its own

Quote:
This is the "lie" Wilson bragged of having "debunked" after being sent by the CIA to Niger in 2002 to check out the intelligence it had received to that effect. Wilson would later angrily deny that his wife had recommended him for this mission, and would do his best to spread the impression that choosing him had been the Vice President's idea.


Wilson "bragged" of debunking?
Wilson spread the impression that the VP had the idea of choosing him?
Wilson angrily denied his wife recommended him?

Wilson did none of those things. It is a lie to claim he did them and anyone that starts their premise with 3 lies is suspect.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 07:24 am
Quote:
Perhaps you could ask Roxxxanne?


Seen her/him around much lately, have ya?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
candidone1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 08:17 am
McGentrix wrote:
candidone1 wrote:
BernardR wrote:
I would be stung to the quick except for three things:

l. Name calling is explictly prohibited by the TOS

2. The first refuge of posters who cannot meet the arguments given to them is to name call.

3. I would never call you names, Mr. Cyclopitchorn. I don't have to. All I have to do, as I just did, is to show that your argument is erroneous.


Do multiple screen-names contravene the TOS?
Why on earth would somone get banned from A2K other than for repeated offenses that were against the TOS?
I direct this to anyone with the relevent information.


Perhaps you could ask Roxxxanne?


Perhaps, but I don't live on A2K, so it's difficult to ascertain who's who and in what disguise.
....but I was actually referring to Bernard and his other aliases in this instance.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 03:00 am
The TOS? I have been informed that one of the rules of the TOS is to follow the topic. The topic of this thread is- Whether President Bush is a liar!!!
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 05:56 am
BernardR wrote:
The TOS? I have been informed that one of the rules of the TOS is to follow the topic. The topic of this thread is- Whether President Bush is a liar!!!

Well Possum, it has already been determined that Bush is a liar. I suppose that should note an end to this topic.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 06:12 am
dyslexia wrote:
BernardR wrote:
The TOS? I have been informed that one of the rules of the TOS is to follow the topic. The topic of this thread is- Whether President Bush is a liar!!!

Well Possum, it has already been determined that Bush is a liar. I suppose that should note an end to this topic.


A2k havin' Possum trouble?




Aha! I have a solution:


http://www.zaptrap.co.nz/Images/ContentImages/possum-daytime.jpg

+


http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/biodiversity/images/possum_trap.jpg


=





http://www.wiretainers.com.au/images/Possum.jpg
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 06:24 am
parados wrote:
Bernie....

This starts with some lies of its own

Quote:
This is the "lie" Wilson bragged of having "debunked" after being sent by the CIA to Niger in 2002 to check out the intelligence it had received to that effect. Wilson would later angrily deny that his wife had recommended him for this mission, and would do his best to spread the impression that choosing him had been the Vice President's idea.


Wilson "bragged" of debunking?
Wilson spread the impression that the VP had the idea of choosing him?
Wilson angrily denied his wife recommended him?

Wilson did none of those things. It is a lie to claim he did them and anyone that starts their premise with 3 lies is suspect.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 08:55 am
Quote:
Sometimes it is useful to review the facts as reported by the MSM and that is in the official record:

1.) Wilson Insisted That The Vice President's Office Sent Him To Niger:

Wilson Said He Traveled To Niger At CIA Request To Help Provide Response To Vice President's Office. "In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. … The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office." (Joseph C. Wilson, Op-Ed, "What I Didn't Find In Africa," The New York Times, 7/6/03)

Joe Wilson: "[W]hat They Did, What The Office Of The Vice President Did, And, In Fact, I Believe Now From Mr. Libby's Statement, It Was Probably The Vice President Himself ..." (CNN's "Late Edition," 8/3/03)
Vice President Cheney: "I Don't Know Joe Wilson. I've Never Met Joe Wilson. … And Joe Wilson - I Don't [Know] Who Sent Joe Wilson. He Never Submitted A Report That I Ever Saw When He Came Back." (NBC's "Meet The Press," 9/14/03)

CIA Director George Tenet: "In An Effort To Inquire About Certain Reports Involving Niger, CIA's Counter-Proliferation Experts, On Their Own Initiative, Asked An Individual With Ties To The Region To Make A Visit To See What He Could Learn." (Central Intelligence Agency, "Statement By George J. Tenet, Director Of Central Intelligence," Press Release, 7/11/03)

Sometimes it is useful to look at the facts...

You start with this statement.
Quote:
Wilson Insisted That The Vice President's Office Sent Him To Niger:


Note your use of the word "insisted" and that the VP office sent him.
Now compare to the statement in your first support.
Quote:
In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report.
Wilson said the CIA sent him in response to questions by the VP office. He doesn't insist anything about the VP office sending him. The only one making the claim that the VP office specifically sent him is you in your statement Fox. If you are alleging that the CIA didn't do this in response to the VP office questions then you should read
Quote:
Officials from the CIA's DO CounterproliferationDivision (CPD) told Committee staff that in response to questions from the Vice President's Office and the Departments of State and Defense on the alleged Iraq-Niger uranium deal, CPD officials discussed ways to obtain additional information. ...
CPD decided to contact a former ambassador to Gabon who had a posting early in his career in Niger.


Report of the Select Committee on Intelligence on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq

In fact Wilson's statement closely resembles the statements by the CIA workers that testified to Congress. Did the CIA lie to congress? Or did they send Wilson in response to the questions by the Vice President's office as they and Wilson both said?

Wilson didn't spread the impression that the VP office chose him. The Congressional report said the same thing Wilson said.

Any claim that Wilson spread "an impression choosing him was the VP idea" is false when compared to the actual record of the congressional report and Wilson's own statements.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 08:58 am
You have to use the whole quote Parados. No fair cherry picking the lines you can rebut if the rest is ignored.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:00 am
Quote:
4.) Wilson Denied His Wife Suggested He Travel To Niger In 2002:

Wilson Claimed His Wife Did Not Suggest He Travel To Niger To Investigate Reports Of Uranium Deal; Instead, Wilson Claims It Came Out Of Meeting With CIA. CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "Among other things, you had always said, always maintained, still maintain your wife, Valerie Plame, a CIA officer, had nothing to do with the decision to send to you Niger to inspect reports that uranium might be sold from Niger to Iraq. … Did Valerie Plame, your wife, come up with the idea to send you to Niger?" Joe Wilson: "No. My wife served as a conduit,


More obfuscation and innuendo here Fox..

Wilson denied his wife suggested he travel vs Wilson denying she had anything to do with the decision. She didn't have anything to do with the decision.
There is a difference between making a recommendation and making the decision. Plame didn't make the decision to send someone to Niger and she didn't make the decision to send her husband.

Show me the evidence of Wilson claiming Plame didn't suggest to the CIA that he go once the CIA decided to send someone. Wilson says she didn't decide. That is a far cry from him saying she didn't suggest him for the position.

There is no evidence of Wilson angrily denying his wife recommended him for the mission. There is evidence of Wilson denying that his wife made the decision. She didn't make the decision. Go read the report by congress again.

The statements I pointed out as false remain false. You have only pointed to how false the arguments are. You have to twist the meanings of words to make Wilson into a liar.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:04 am
Congratulations are in order to the rightwingnuts. This thread is now discussing whether or not Mr. Wilson is a liar. It is not longer discussing whether or not the Shrub is a liar.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:06 am
Foxfyre wrote:
You have to use the whole quote Parados. No fair cherry picking the lines you can rebut if the rest is ignored.


Nice line Fox.. Maybe you should use it then when you attempt to prove this quote is true.


Quote:
and would do his best to spread the impression that choosing him had been the Vice President's idea.


You failed to address the quote but cherry picked a meaning to attack.

Show us when Wilson claimed the VP had the idea to send Wilson.
The VP office asked the question. The CIA sent Wilson in response to that question. Wilson said the CIA sent him in response to the question. There is NO quote from Wilson that states "Cheney picked me to go" or anything similar.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:07 am
parados wrote:
Quote:
4.) Wilson Denied His Wife Suggested He Travel To Niger In 2002:

Wilson Claimed His Wife Did Not Suggest He Travel To Niger To Investigate Reports Of Uranium Deal; Instead, Wilson Claims It Came Out Of Meeting With CIA. CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "Among other things, you had always said, always maintained, still maintain your wife, Valerie Plame, a CIA officer, had nothing to do with the decision to send to you Niger to inspect reports that uranium might be sold from Niger to Iraq. … Did Valerie Plame, your wife, come up with the idea to send you to Niger?" Joe Wilson: "No. My wife served as a conduit,


More obfuscation and innuendo here Fox..

Wilson denied his wife suggested he travel vs Wilson denying she had anything to do with the decision. She didn't have anything to do with the decision.
There is a difference between making a recommendation and making the decision. Plame didn't make the decision to send someone to Niger and she didn't make the decision to send her husband.

Show me the evidence of Wilson claiming Plame didn't suggest to the CIA that he go once the CIA decided to send someone. Wilson says she didn't decide. That is a far cry from him saying she didn't suggest him for the position.

There is no evidence of Wilson angrily denying his wife recommended him for the mission. There is evidence of Wilson denying that his wife made the decision. She didn't make the decision. Go read the report by congress again.

The statements I pointed out as false remain false. You have only pointed to how false the arguments are. You have to twist the meanings of words to make Wilson into a liar.


I have conceded that the 'angrily' qualifier cannot be substantiated from the record.

But here:
Quote:
CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "Among other things, you had always said, always maintained, still maintain your wife, Valerie Plame, a CIA officer, had nothing to do with the decision to send to you Niger to inspect reports that uranium might be sold from Niger to Iraq. … Did Valerie Plame, your wife, come up with the idea to send you to Niger?" Joe Wilson: "No. My wife served as a conduit.


The CIA documents and the testimony before the Senate committee clearly show that Valerie Plame DID suggest that it be her husband who was sent to Niger. The memo by her hand was proof of that. So the issue was not how or why there be a trip to Niger, but how it happened that Joe Wilson was the one chosen to make it. It's little details like that which are criticial here, Parados, and trying to change the question or the premise of the issue isn't helpful.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:10 am
Mr. Wilson is not the President of the United States.

Nor was he the only US investigation into the Niger deal; the other two independent inquiries reported the same thing that he did.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:12 am
DrewDad wrote:
Mr. Wilson is not the President of the United States.

Nor was he the only US investigation into the Niger deal; the other two independent inquiries reported the same thing that he did.


To this day, I believe British intelligence is standing by their report of the Niger connection to Iraq's WMD. And no, nobody but Wilson and those who want him to be right support his version of the facts on that. The CIA sure didn't think he had much that was credible which is why Cheney never got his report.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:18 am
Fox..

You are too funny....

Wilson denied she DECIDED he should go.

Wilson did NOT deny she recommended him for the mission.

This statement is FALSE..
Quote:
Wilson would later angrily deny that his wife had recommended him for this mission


Note the discussion with Blitzer..
Quote:
CNN's Wolf Blitzer: "Among other things, you had always said, always maintained, still maintain your wife, Valerie Plame, a CIA officer, had nothing to do with the decision to send to you Niger to inspect reports that uranium might be sold from Niger to Iraq. … Did Valerie Plame, your wife, come up with the idea to send you to Niger?" Joe Wilson: "No. My wife served as a conduit.


"suggestion" is not synonymous with "decision."


Maintaining she had nothing to do with the decision does NOT equate to she had nothing to do with the suggestion.

If I suggest you go jump off a bridge and you do it does that mean I was involved in your decision?
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:20 am
Foxfyre wrote:
DrewDad wrote:
Mr. Wilson is not the President of the United States.

Nor was he the only US investigation into the Niger deal; the other two independent inquiries reported the same thing that he did.


To this day, I believe British intelligence is standing by their report of the Niger connection to Iraq's WMD. And no, nobody but Wilson and those who want him to be right support his version of the facts on that. The CIA sure didn't think he had much that was credible which is why Cheney never got his report.

Fox, believe what you want, but two other independent United States inquiries determined that the British claim was wrong.

So you're saying you want to believe the British more than you want to believe US sources....
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:24 am
Foxfyre wrote:

The qualifiers such as 'angrily' could be disputable, but the facts themselves are not.

Sometimes it is useful to review the facts as reported by the MSM and that is in the official record:

1.) Wilson Insisted That The Vice President's Office Sent Him To Niger:

Wilson Said He Traveled To Niger At CIA Request To Help Provide Response To Vice President's Office. "In February 2002, I was informed by officials at the Central Intelligence Agency that Vice President Dick Cheney's office had questions about a particular intelligence report. … The agency officials asked if I would travel to Niger to check out the story so they could provide a response to the vice president's office." (Joseph C. Wilson, Op-Ed, "What I Didn't Find In Africa," The New York Times, 7/6/03)

Joe Wilson: "[W]hat They Did, What The Office Of The Vice President Did, And, In Fact, I Believe Now From Mr. Libby's Statement, It Was Probably The Vice President Himself ..." (CNN's "Late Edition," 8/3/03)
Vice President Cheney: "I Don't Know Joe Wilson. I've Never Met Joe Wilson. … And Joe Wilson - I Don't [Know] Who Sent Joe Wilson. He Never Submitted A Report That I Ever Saw When He Came Back." (NBC's "Meet The Press," 9/14/03)

CIA Director George Tenet: "In An Effort To Inquire About Certain Reports Involving Niger, CIA's Counter-Proliferation Experts, On Their Own Initiative, Asked An Individual With Ties To The Region To Make A Visit To See What He Could Learn." (Central Intelligence Agency, "Statement By George J. Tenet, Director Of Central Intelligence," Press Release, 7/11/03)


Oh my. (Covers mouth with hand.) These quotes look they could be... could they? ...no, it can't be that they are taken out of context. Let's take them one by one.

The first one is accurate and supports Wilson's contention that he never said the VP sent him.

The second one is out of context and incomplete. Here's a snippet from the actual transcript.

Quote:
BLITZER: Is that true?

WILSON: Well, look, it's absolutely true that neither the vice president nor Dr. Rice nor even George Tenet knew that I was traveling to Niger.

What they did, what the office of the vice president did, and, in fact, I believe now from Mr. Libby's statement, it was probably the vice president himself...

BLITZER: Scooter Libby is the chief of staff for the vice president.

WILSON: Scooter Libby.

They asked essentially that we follow up on this report -- that the agency follow up on the report. So it was a question that went to the CIA briefer from the Office of the Vice President. The CIA, at the operational level, made a determination that the best way to answer this serious question was to send somebody out there who knew something about both the uranium business and those Niger officials that were in office at the time these reported documents were executed.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0308/03/le.00.html

He never actually finishes that sentence, but goes on to clarify that the VPs office asked for clarification from the CIA, which is totally consistent with what he has always said.

The quotes after that essentially support Wilson's assertion that he never said it was the VPs office that sent him and that it was the CIA who sent him in order to respond to a request for more information.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:24 am
I believe the British later found the claim to be without merit as well.

They didn't decide that til after the speech so Bush still has that to fall back on, the British believed it to be true at the time he said it.
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jun, 2006 09:36 am
parados wrote:
I believe the British later found the claim to be without merit as well.

They didn't decide that til after the speech so Bush still has that to fall back on, the British believed it to be true at the time he said it.

From Wikipedia:

Quote:
Butler Report
While some officials in the CIA were skeptical of the Niger documents, President Bush relied mainly on intelligence from Britain for his State of the Union message and used the Niger documents for confirmation. Britain had multiple sources for the intelligence that Iraq sought uranium from both Niger and the Republic of Congo. Here are some conclusions from the Butler Report (which was very critical of other aspects of intelligence findings on WMD in Iraq) found on pages 122-125: [30]

Conclusion 494. There was further and separate intelligence that in 1999 the Iraqi regime had also made inquiries about the purchase of uranium ore in the Democratic Republic of Congo. In this case, there was some evidence that by 2002 an agreement for a sale had been reached.

Conclusion 499. We conclude that, on the basis of the intelligence assessments at the time, covering both Niger and the Democratic Republic of Congo, the statements on Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa in the Government's dossier, and by the Prime Minister in the House of Commons, were well-founded. By extension, we conclude also that the statement in President Bush's State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that: "The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa" was well-founded.

Conclusion 503. From our examination of the intelligence and other material on Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa, we have concluded that:

a. It is accepted by all parties that Iraqi officials visited Niger in 1999.
b. The British Government had intelligence from several different sources indicating that this visit was for the purpose of acquiring uranium. Since uranium constitutes almost three-quarters of Niger's exports, the intelligence was credible.
c. The evidence was not conclusive that Iraq actually purchased, as opposed to having sought, uranium, and the British Government did not claim this.
d. The forged documents were not available to the British Government at the time its assessment was made, and so the fact of the forgery does not undermine it.
Although sources other than the Niger documents are mentioned, no evidence of this is advanced directly within the Butler Report itself.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 11/28/2024 at 02:36:18