DrewDad wrote:This has got to be the funniest thread running right now....
Brandon, you have yet to address the "16 words" controversy; your silence on this speaks volumes.
Typically, however, you ignore anything which you cannot address, and choose instead to focus myopically on language interpretation....
Mostly it says that I've never heard of the 16 word controversy. I hate to disappoint you, but I actually have a life in the real world, and don't read every post here. Why don't you tell me what it is so that I may address it. And, need I remind you that you rarely answer questions I ask of you, so why should I answer all of yours? But go ahead, tell me what it is and I'll respond.
Brandon9000 wrote:DrewDad wrote:This has got to be the funniest thread running right now....
Brandon, you have yet to address the "16 words" controversy; your silence on this speaks volumes.
Typically, however, you ignore anything which you cannot address, and choose instead to focus myopically on language interpretation....
Mostly it says that I've never heard of the 16 word controversy. I hate to disappoint you, but I actually have a life in the real world, and don't read every post here. Why don't you tell me what it is so that I may address it. And, need I remind you that you rarely answer questions I ask of you, so why should I answer all of yours? But go ahead, tell me what it is and I'll respond.
If you don't read every post then how can you say that we have not proven that Bush is a liar? I say we have proven it. Now prove me wrong.
DrewDad wrote:Brandon9000 wrote:DrewDad wrote:This has got to be the funniest thread running right now....
Brandon, you have yet to address the "16 words" controversy; your silence on this speaks volumes.
Typically, however, you ignore anything which you cannot address, and choose instead to focus myopically on language interpretation....
Mostly it says that I've never heard of the 16 word controversy. I hate to disappoint you, but I actually have a life in the real world, and don't read every post here. Why don't you tell me what it is so that I may address it. And, need I remind you that you rarely answer questions I ask of you, so why should I answer all of yours? But go ahead, tell me what it is and I'll respond.
If you don't read every post then how can you say that we have not proven that Bush is a liar? I say we have proven it. Now prove me wrong.
Alright, I will do so gladly. Please tell any single statement of his which you allege to be a proven lie and then give me a link to the post in this thread or any other thread which proves it. I'm certainly not going to read every post based on your general allegation that somewhere in there some lie you decline to mention is proven.
