6
   

Immigration and Racism in Britain and USA

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 04:19 pm
cjhsa wrote:
I take it as a racist comment directed at their hosts.

That must involve a wholly novel definition of "racism".
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 04:20 pm
cjhsa wrote:
If you move to a new country, it is a simple matter of respect to learn the language and culture.

This clearly isn't the case in Mexico's invasion of California and other border states.

I take it as a racist comment directed at their hosts.


I was cut in line at a convenience store the other day by a young man with a celophane wrapped sandwich, some chips and a drink. He was in a big hurry, and I don't know if he even saw me.

He was paying for his stuff, and I tried to get his attention, just to let him know I didn't appreciate the rudeness - just a matter of standing up for myself in a small way - didn't want to start anything, just didn't want to let it completely pass.

He seemed to completely ignore me, then the cashier looked over his shoulder to me and said "I apologize for him - he doesn't speak any English at all." Just to save face, I said "Well he has no manners, in any language", but I had already let it go - partly becasue of what I saw...

There were half a dozen of them scurrying around, trying to get back on a truck before it left them. If I had to guess I'd say they were illegals, returning to work after a lunch break. they were dirty, and looked hungry and tired. And they all made it back on the truck - the guy was pulling away when the last one jumped aboard.

Y'know what? I don't think he was being racist not to speak my language. I really think all he's had time to do so far is try to survive...
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 04:21 pm
Really?

Why should I be forced to accept their culture and language?

I'm hoping you're joking nimh.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 04:25 pm
snood wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
If you move to a new country, it is a simple matter of respect to learn the language and culture.

This clearly isn't the case in Mexico's invasion of California and other border states.

I take it as a racist comment directed at their hosts.


I was cut in line at a convenience store the other day by a young man with a celophane wrapped sandwich, some chips and a drink. He was in a big hurry, and I don't know if he even saw me.

He was paying for his stuff, and I tried to get his attention, just to let him know I didn't appreciate the rudeness - just a matter of standing up for myself in a small way - didn't want to start anything, just didn't want to let it completely pass.

He seemed to completely ignore me, then the cashier looked over his shoulder to me and said "I apologize for him - he doesn't speak any English at all." Just to save face, I said "Well he has no manners, in any language", but I had already let it go - partly becasue of what I saw...

There were half a dozen of them scurrying around, trying to get back on a truck before it left them. If I had to guess I'd say they were illegals, returning to work after a lunch break. they were dirty, and looked hungry and tired. And they all made it back on the truck - the guy was pulling away when the last one jumped aboard.

Y'know what? I don't think he was being racist not to speak my language. I really think all he's had time to do so far is try to survive...


I'm really sorry that had to happen to you, Snood. But Jorge on the dayworker truck isn't exactly what I was talking about.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 06:39 pm
cjhsa wrote:
Really?

Why should I be forced to accept their culture and language?

Uuuuhh ... huh?

You said that, in your view, if Mexican immigrants in US border states are not learning the language and culture, that's "a racist comment" on their part, directed at Americans.

I said that to call that racism, must involve a whole new definition of racism.

Not learning the local language as immigrant Not Equal racism. Not by any traditional definition of the word, anyway.

Yeah?

Now, tell me what you are on about.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 06:53 pm
cjhsa wrote:
If you move to a new country, it is a simple matter of respect to learn the language and culture.

This clearly isn't the case in Mexico's invasion of California and other border states.

I take it as a racist comment directed at their hosts.
I don't think the labor free market gives a **** what you think. Mexicans and corporate America have a beautiful relationship. Laughing

Good luck fighting the government. Globalization is going to happen. Work harder.
0 Replies
 
flushd
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Jul, 2006 07:07 pm
I'd love to watch cjhsa in a conversation with some of my family in Quebec.
Man, that would be fun!

Learn french or die! Laughing

I think oftentimes, people will willingly learn the language of their adoptive country. Not bc it is 'respectful'. Bc it makes it easier to live, make good money, and it can enhance the probability of your children getting-on well in the new soceity.

When 'respect' comes into the picture, you get radicals.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Sat 15 Jul, 2006 06:32 am
flushd wrote:
I'd love to watch cjhsa in a conversation with some of my family in Quebec.
Man, that would be fun!

Learn french or die! Laughing



Precisely my point madamoiselle.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jul, 2006 01:54 am
I normally agree with some of the fine posts that chjsa creates but I must, unfortunately, disagree with his last charge of racism on the part of the Hispanic Community UNLESS, of course, he can convince me that they can fit the definition of racism.

Racism, as I have written, and which, I believe is not understood by some on these threads, is defined as "A doctrine that INHERENT differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement"

If Hispanics in the USA do believe that Caucasians are INHERENTLY different from Hispanics and therefore UNABLE to participate in their culture under any circumstances, then chjsa may be correct.

Some, of course, would say that my depiction of Senator Obama as a former cocaine user, who attended two years of schooling in a Muslim School and was later deserted by his Kenyan father, would be defined as a RACIST comment( even if the facts are found in Obama's autobiography). It is clear that it is not when viewed according to the definition of Racism above.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jul, 2006 03:16 am
Amigo wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
If you move to a new country, it is a simple matter of respect to learn the language and culture.

This clearly isn't the case in Mexico's invasion of California and other border states.

I take it as a racist comment directed at their hosts.
I don't think the labor free market gives a **** what you think. Mexicans and corporate America have a beautiful relationship. Laughing

Good luck fighting the government. Globalization is going to happen. Work harder.
And therein lies the racism you're searching for. Perhaps not in the traditional sense that BernardR is trying to differentiate, but what is the difference? I'm better than other folks because I was lucky enough to be born on the right side of some arbitrary line in the sand? I deserve more, or better opportunity, why?

Quibble over the definition of racism till your heart is content; but the Hispanic born in Texas is no more human the Hispanic born just south of there, and I'll continue to find every opinion to the contrary: racist.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jul, 2006 03:44 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Quibble over the definition of racism till your heart is content; but the Hispanic born in Texas is no more human the Hispanic born just south of there, and I'll continue to find every opinion to the contrary: racist.

Is there anyone who ever said he was?

I think the quibbling over "racism" started with cjhsa asserting that if Hispanic immigrants dont learn the American "language and culture", they're being racist.

Dont think anyone's said that Hispanics in Texas are better than Hispanics in Mexico, not that I saw of, anyway.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jul, 2006 04:39 am
nimh wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Quibble over the definition of racism till your heart is content; but the Hispanic born in Texas is no more human the Hispanic born just south of there, and I'll continue to find every opinion to the contrary: racist.

Is there anyone who ever said he was?

I think the quibbling over "racism" started with cjhsa asserting that if Hispanic immigrants dont learn the American "language and culture", they're being racist.

Dont think anyone's said that Hispanics in Texas are better than Hispanics in Mexico, not that I saw of, anyway.
The example was mine alone... to illustrate that I find the "everyone from here is of the same race initially (like the anti-Semite quibble for another example) to be a poor argument against racism. I, personally, think the term racism is broader than it used to be.

My objection wasn't to Cjhsa, this time, but rather Amigo's:

"I don't think the labor free market gives a **** what you think. Mexicans and corporate America have a beautiful relationship.

Good luck fighting the government. Globalization is going to happen. Work harder." Though he said it sarcastically, I think his words are spot on... and good advice for a fair reality. Arbitrary lines in the sand shouldn't be the defining reason that one man has more opportunity than the next. Racist, while not a perfect word for folks who feel otherwise, is the most accurate descriptor I can think of at present.
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jul, 2006 10:48 pm
Mr.Occom Bill. I went to school and studied under the Jesuits in High School. One of the basic rules I learned from them was

define your terms define your terms define your terms

Racism is defined as---

THE DOCTRINE THAT INHERENT DIFFERENCES AMONG THE VARIOUS HUMAN RACES DETERMINE CULTURAL OR INDIVIDUAL ACHIEVEMENT.

You do know what Inherent differences are, do you not? Inherent differences are differences which are PERMANENT AND INSEPARABLE FROM THE PERSON AT HAND.

(e.g. Hispanics are all lazy. It's in their blood)


On the other hand, there are Ethnic differences. These differences are not viewed as PERMANENT AND INSEPARABLE. Someone may say that a newly arrived immigrant is callow or uncommuicative but those characteristics may only be a product of CULTURE.

People can acquire culture( with a small c).If one is truly a racist, the racist views the person at hand as permanently flawed with no hope of change.


If you are interested in this topic, I respectfully recommend a ground breaking book---The End of Racism by Dinesh D"Sousa.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:15 am
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/66879.html

Another murder

Sectarianism and hypocrisy in Scotland and Northern Ireland
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:50 am
BernardR wrote:
If you are interested in this topic, I respectfully recommend a ground breaking book---The End of Racism by Dinesh D"Sousa.
Added to my reading list, thanks, but it will likely be a decade before I get to it. I currently can't even find time to argue with my friend Finn, which, believe me... I am very much looking forward to.
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 08:09 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Added to my reading list, thanks, but it will likely be a decade before I get to it.

Don't worry, O'Bill: if Bernardomassochiczagatto has read a book, he'll quote it so often on these boards that you'll feel like you've read it.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 09:17 am
joe wrote:
Don't worry, O'Bill: if Bernardomassochiczagatto has read a book, he'll quote it so often on these boards that you'll feel like you've read it.


Hi, joe, that was a knee slapper. Thanks for my morn'n laugh. Wink
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 02:57 pm
Hmm... this is about all of Europe (or 20 EU Member States, anyway), rather than just the UK -- but it still seems to fit interests better on this thread than the Following the EU thread.

The article below deals with a series of 20 country-specific Shadow Reports on Racism in Europe in 2005, which was published last week. The reports are drafted by a network of NGOs that are affiliated to the European Network Against Racism (ENAR). ENAR also again published an EU-wide Shadow Report about racism.

The reports deal with the appearance of racism and discrimination in Europe at both legislative and local level, from policy to practice. This year ENAR also published a separate report on Islamophobia in Europe. All the reports can be found here:

2005 Shadow Reports on Racism in Europe

--------------------------

Quote:
Muslims on front line as racism rises across EU

The Independent
Stephen Castle
26 July 2006

Racism, xenophobia and far-right extremism are on the rise across Europe, according to a comprehensive survey which found that Muslim communities face mounting discrimination and prejudice.

The report, by non-governmental organisations in 20 EU countries, criticises governments for losing interest in the battle against racism, and says the political reaction to terrorist attacks has made life harder for ethnic minorities.

The inquiry by the European Network against Racism highlights a trend towards "increased tolerance for discriminatory behaviour particularly against immigrants and Muslims". It adds that "a lack of political will to address racism is sometimes evident and disturbing".

The section on the UK, compiled by the Runnymede Trust, chronicles the reaction to the July 7 terror attacks in London last year concluding that new immigration and security policies have helped create a situation in which racism has flourished.

The report on France describes immigration policies as being "at the heart of institutional racism" in the country. In Germany almost 15,000 refugees had their asylum claims revoked last year, compared with 577 in 1998.

Anti-terror crackdowns have led to racial profiling [..], the report says. "[..] The UK also reports an increase in the disproportionate use of 'stop and search' against minority groups. [..]

Across the Continent researchers found evidence that police forces have failed in their duty to investigate and prevent racist crime. "Sometimes racially motivated crime is simply not taken seriously," says the document, adding that police are "reluctant to record a crime as such, as highlighted for instance in the reports on Hungary and Lithuania. [..]"

Even more worrying is the growth of extremist political forces. The report notes: "A rise of right-wing extremism, as well as other forms of nationalism, is evident in a number of countries, such as Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Latvia, Malta and Slovak Republic.

"The use of the internet as a tool for the dissemination of racist sentiment, crime and propaganda is particularly worrying given that internet crime is not often recorded and the legal difficulties that have been experienced in challenging internet-based criminal activity."

Victims of racism range from Europe's Jewish communities to its Roma minorities. But a separate document on Islamophobia reports a dramatic increase in incidents against Muslims, particularly in France.

It says: "The rise of intolerance and discrimination towards Muslims has risen in the last year and the underlying tones of Islamophobia have infiltrated all forms of public and private lives for Muslims in Europe."
0 Replies
 
BernardR
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 03:11 pm
Dear Joe from Chicago: As an attorney, I would think you would welcome the dissemination of knowledge even if a book title would be given by me. But, I understand--My son, who graduated from Harvard Law School said that many of the lawyers he has met in Chicago( He works for a top hundred law firm) are not at all well read. He says they know black letter law but are otherwise quite uniformed.

Yes, I mentioned a book - it was Dinesh D'Sousa's "The End of Racism"

a good book- HAVE YOU READ IT? I think not.

Have you read- Maestro by Bob Woodward- a biography of ALan Greenspan- I read it. HAve you? I think not.

Have you read Modern Times?- A history by Paul Johnson- I read it- HAve you. I think not.

Have you read Truman by David Mc Cullough- A Pulitizer Prize winner in History.I read it. Have you? I think not.

Have you read Shadow by Bob Woodard? a book about the Presidents after Watergate.I read it. Have you? I think not.

You are obvioulsy unable to accept the fact that some people read far far more than some of the ambulance chasers at 26th and California, Mr. Joe from Chicago!!!


I listed only five of the many books in my Library some of which I have read more than once to show Mr. Joe from Chicago, that, yes, some of us read more than lawyers. And I know how much they have to read!!!
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jul, 2006 04:29 pm
I'm shocked. Bernardomassochiczagatto mentions five books that he has read, and none of them was authored by Richard Posner. But then perhaps Posner is the author of all the other books in his vast library.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/08/2025 at 06:11:04