6
   

Immigration and Racism in Britain and USA

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2006 12:32 pm
george, It's easy to find "exceptions" to anything that happened in the past and at present. That doesn't mean racism hasn't played a large part in US immigration.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2006 05:30 pm
Francis wrote:
I don't know if whinner is an insult but, imo, it's no worse than obtuse..!

Aah.. so it was this one other thread, the only one we've ever clashed on before I bashed Portugal's football, where Chai, Reyn and I thought you were "acting obtuse", that stuck in your craw so.

Well, ok, if you think "whiner", "screg of humankind", "racist and crappy company", "cheater" and "inherently racist" are all merely an equivalent answer to "Oh c'mon Francis, dont act obtuse," thats eh, your prerogative.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2006 05:32 pm
Talking about racism in Britain, we should probably note the brutal murder of an Asian prisoner by his racist cellmate last week.

It's a heartbreaking story. Even the Telegraph, usually not the first newspaper to rush to the defence of an immigrant-family prisoner, was very outspoken about it.

Read the portrait of the victim:

Quote:
Zahid Mubarek was not much of a criminal. His few offences, committed after he fell into drug-taking, were mostly petty and he clearly regretted them.

The portrait of the killer:

Quote:
Robert Stewart was a known psychopath. He had RIP tattooed on his forehead. He held extreme racist views and expressed violent intentions towards ethnic minorities.

A month before he murdered Zahid, he wrote: "If I do not get bail on the 7th, I'll take xtreme measures to get shipped out, kill me f****n' padmate if I have to, bleach me sheets and pillowcase white and make a Ku Klux Klan outfit and walk out me pad wiv a flaming crucifix."


and the damning editorial:

Quote:
A racist murder waiting to happen

(Filed: 30/06/2006)

The litany of failure preceeding the murder of Zahid Mubarek in the Feltham Young Offender Institution in 2000 disgraces the Prison Service. To put Mubarek, a convicted petty thief, in a cell with his eventual killer, Robert Stewart, was an act of idiocy. Stewart is a psychopath. He had written letters in which he talked of "niggers" and "Paki bastards". In an act of almost criminal dereliction, he had been allowed, a few days before he murdered Mubarek, to watch a violent film portraying neo-Nazis fighting Asians. Stewart gave numerous other indications both of his propensity for violence and his racialist bigotry while at Feltham. These were ignored by staff, 19 of whom - from the then governor down - were named in Mr Justice Keith's report on the killing as having been derelict in their duties. The judge makes 88 recommendations for improving custody: perhaps the most significant of these is that either more money must be invested in prisons, or the numbers in them must be cut.

The report also records disgusting behaviour by warders, whose culture of racism included the routine reference to ethnic minority prisoners as "monkeys" and "black bastards". It is a fundamental point of our legal and penal systems that all must be treated equally. In such a culture, Mubarek hardly stood a chance. Feltham was already defined as a failing institution, yet the governor sent to improve it, Niall Clifford, is condemned by Mr Justice Keith. So is his then deputy, John Byrd, who was supposed to be the prison's race relations officer. Perhaps this is why Feltham is now accused, like the Metropolitan Police at the time of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry, of "institutional murder" and why, in one of his more controversial recommendations, the judge suggests a new definition of "institutional religious intolerance".

These labels are dangerous. Racial and religious bigotries are manifestations of the spirit of individuals and their own motives. They must be confronted individually. Institutions, by contrast, embody a variety of people, many of whom would not subscribe to such an offensive prevailing culture. The labels might make good soundbites, but they will do nothing to address this cancerous problem of ill-motivated and incompetent people running our prisons. When petty criminals go to prison and die at the hands of evil cellmates, there are evidently problems that need to be addressed by recourse to firm management, not to the mantras of sociology. Prison plays a vital part in our justice system. Those who deserve the punishment must be incarcerated. But if they are, when in prison, forced to endure a fate not decreed by justice, then the whole basis of our system of imprisonment is undermined: and so, too, is our rule of law.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2006 07:13 pm
I think psychopathy can and should be seperated from racism, even though this particular psychopath rode that particular vehicle of extreme behaviour.

Non-psychopathic racism is more like real racism to me. You can't judge the standards of the average Christian by a psychopath who murders prostitutes because God told him to.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2006 07:22 pm
Eorl wrote:
I think psychopathy can and should be seperated from racism, even though this particular psychopath rode that particular vehicle of extreme behaviour.

Non-psychopathic racism is more like real racism to me. You can't judge the standards of the average Christian by a psychopath who murders prostitutes because God told him to.

True, but what about the "disgusting behaviour by warders, whose culture of racism included the routine reference to ethnic minority prisoners as "monkeys" and "black bastards"'?

Or the "19 [staff] whom - from the then governor down - were named in Mr Justice Keith's report on the killing as having been derelict in their duties"?

And that's just the Telegraph's version of it ... I'm sure the Guardian or Independent have even more to say on it.
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 2 Jul, 2006 07:55 pm
Yep, I'm with you there nimh.

I wonder how many different types and causes of racism there are?

Also, the degree of racism must vary from person to person so much....I wonder is anyone truly absolutely non-racist?

I often catch myself being positively racist, which still feels like the right thing to do...... yet, it's still treating someone differently on the basis of skin colour, and that's racism.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 12:10 am
nimh wrote:
Francis wrote:
I don't know if whinner is an insult but, imo, it's no worse than obtuse..!

Aah.. so it was this one other thread, the only one we've ever clashed on before I bashed Portugal's football, where Chai, Reyn and I thought you were "acting obtuse", that stuck in your craw so.

Well, ok, if you think "whiner", "screg of humankind", "racist and crappy company", "cheater" and "inherently racist" are all merely an equivalent answer to "Oh c'mon Francis, dont act obtuse," thats eh, your prerogative.


Yes, Nimh, it's my prerogative to think that you are a cheater!

And you demonstrated it again and again. You are trying to find a scape goat to your own sins. You would do anything to make the point even on matters remotely connected to my accusation of racism...

But if you want, do a search and you'll find more of the reasons I dislike you.

Doing specious comments to trivial talk is one of your specialities and calling other posters on rescue (pack behavior) is one of the things I abhorre...

And it's also my right to think, deeply, that you are a screg of humankind...
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 01:39 am
Confused Huh. I would have thought it damn near impossible to not like Nimh, let alone consider him a screg of humankind. Racist? Shocked Laughing No offense Francis, but you're way out there on this one.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 01:57 am
Immigration, sectarianism, tribalism (separate schools a cause?) still a problem in W Scotland, even after 150 years

http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/65188.html
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 02:05 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
Confused Huh. I would have thought it damn near impossible to not like Nimh, let alone consider him a screg of humankind. Racist? Shocked Laughing No offense Francis, but you're way out there on this one.


Ok, Bill! I'll keep the cheater and the whiner Laughing
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:02 am
Francis wrote:
But if you want, do a search and you'll find more of the reasons I dislike you. [..]

And it's also my right to think, deeply, that you are a screg of humankind...

Well, I wish I could reciprocate, but I've always thought of you as a good guy. This outburst of yours yesterday totally came out of leftfield for me, I'm just baffled. Screg of human kind? Weirdness.

And I wasnt "calling other posters on rescue", I was merely pointing out that the reaction that you apparently think was so totally outrageous of mine in the other thread that you still havent forgiven me, was one literally agreed on by a bunch of posters - so just saying, perhaps it wasnt me who was out of whack, there.

But, whatever. You hate me. So be it. I'll try to keep out of your way.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 09:40 am
So, Nimh, you do not have the courage of your own opinions that you have to point out that a "bunch" of other posters agrees with you...

I could here quote Anatole France (Setanta's sig line)!

As you are obtuse enough, I'll remind you again that my nights are longer than 90 minutes...

But you are diverting the origin of my real anger about you. I told you yet, outdated rhetorics!

I'm mad about your hypocrisy! And don't pat me on the shoulder, I dont need your sympathy!

And, as a prototype of a whiner, you are telling people that I hate you and implying it's for nothing.

Then you wonder about the screg...

I do not hate people, I'm incapable of that.

If you knew me better, you would know that my main motivation is love but it seems you have problems with that...

So, if you want to stay away from me, please do so.

I will not avoid you and, if the situation arise, I'll quote you as promised.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 10:53 am
Yes, quotes to prove your accusation about my "inherent racism" would still be very welcome. I dont like people accusing me of such serious things without even ever showing what they are alluding too. Thats just slinging mud.

In fact, I still havent got a clue what exactly it is you're so upset about, apart from that I wrote about how disgusted I was with the Portuguese football team, and that in another thread I said "oh come on, man, don't be obtuse" when you went off-topic. That somehow doesnt seem reason enough for this kind of outburst, and it certainly doesnt show any racism.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 11:08 am
Yes, poor Nimh! You don't like this or that!

But you like boasting silly comments on people when you know they cannot answer you as they told they were away.

I've told you yet that you are a cheater as you use all kinds of arguments, even opposites ones in order to make your point.

As you are a bit persistent in showing such lame techniques, you'll always find me to tell what crap that is!

I'll quote you as I promised, in my own schedule, and will show you how much "off topic" I was since I didn't had the occasion to expand about the subject, precisely due to your intempestive apostrophe...
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 12:45 pm
There's a comment in today's Evening Standard (page 37, West End final), by Hannah Pool (a black journalist), titled : Has London grown out of racism.

She re-tells a Channel 4 tv debate from last week, entitled "Racism, it ain't what it used to be."

Obviously, espeically young people didn't want to talk about the situation in the 70's but how racism looks alike today, from their point of view, and how bad they felt treated.

Hannah Pool ends:
Quote:
The one thing these kids did have in common was that they all lived in London, and at times I had to stop myself telling them they didn't know how lucky they were.
Sure. London isn't perfect, and there are some boroughs both blacks and whites consider no-go zones (I cycled along the canal to Enfiled last weekend but wouldn't go ino a pub because I got bad vibes from all-white crowd sitting outside), but there is a reason why 45 per cent of ethnic minoroties in the UK choose to live here, and it's got nothing to do with the streets being paved with gold (LOndon may hold opportunity but it's also expensive, unwiedldy and lonely to any newcomer).
When I am asked to articulate the difference bewteen London and the rest of Britain, I always give the same answer: for a black person who has grown up elsewhere in the UK, coming to London is like finding Jesus.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 12:59 pm
Sometimes I get the feeling that I have been occasionally a bit overbearing in my criticisms of the ideas expressed by others here. In addition most of you are familiar with my occasionally intemperate criticisms of European politics and policy - I even worry about that (a little), though I quickly get over it.

Francis and Nimh are making me feel a bit better about my failings in these areas. We are all subject to episodes of what can appear to others as misplaced aggression. Usually there is a rational explanation for it, a reason, but often it is hard for others to see and understand.

Francis, who is usually a model of restraint and understatement (virtues I don't posess), is behaving like a hot-tempered Irishman. Nimh, who appears to pride himself in seeing both sides of questions - the yin and the yang of everything, professed to be bewildered, even though it seems likely he does understand at least part of the source of Francis' pique.

Both of you are among the posters here who keep me coming back to A2K. ( Indeed I have already lost a good deal of my former interest in the site due to the diminishing number of interesting posters). I hope you will get by this and each make an effort to understand the other's point of view.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 01:15 pm
Well, George, I, too, like your usually pondered posts. However, I've seen you going "off topic" but found it irrelevant as you didn't attack other posters personally.

I understood what lead you to such excesses and in what mood you were.

Errare humanum est.

But keeping restraint doesn't mean one have to accept any kind of silly behavior and the meanness of some.

So this time I decided it was too much and act accordingly.

From what you read from me, you cannot tell that I dont keep the same line of thought.

But also it did liberate me a bit. I'm feeling better now...
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 01:28 pm
Fortunately I abhor Francis and Nimh and Georgeob equally making me the only one maintaining a sound rational perspective.
thank you very much,
The Dys.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 01:28 pm
Thanks for the kind words. I'm glad you feel better. Good to see there's still a little Celtic fire in the blood over there.
0 Replies
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Mon 3 Jul, 2006 01:32 pm
Dys, my friend in Velveeta, you'll always be the model upon which my balance is based..
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/11/2025 at 11:27:25