Iran Air Strikes Growing in Probability

Vietnamnurse wrote:

Asherman: You are just full of it! Yes, we could have killed all the Vietnamese and WON the war! Turned it into a parking lot. And for what? So we could say we were the best and we are never to be beaten? Good grief that kind of thinking is exactly why we are mired down in Iraq. Hubris and no common sense.

What are you talking about? You claim Asherman is "full of it," yet your remark bears no resemblance whatsoever to what he said. It appears it is you who is "full of it."

The first thing you can do is read her name Chicken Little!

Vietnamnurse ... that tells you shes been somewhere neither you or Ash have been.

Most importantly, it shows that she is no coward, and unlike you, has served 1) Her country 2) in the military 3) in a fukking war zone.

For someone who hasn't got the balls to even show up, let alone be in an armed conflict, you've got a lot of crust challenging anyone. When you crawl out from under your mommies skirts, step up to the plate and get some courage, you may have the right to open your mouth.

Until then, all you can do is hide under mommies skirts, quiver, and piss your pants like the rest of your ilk!!!

Ticomaya wrote:

Vietnamnurse wrote:

Asherman: You are just full of it! Yes, we could have killed all the Vietnamese and WON the war! Turned it into a parking lot. And for what? So we could say we were the best and we are never to be beaten? Good grief that kind of thinking is exactly why we are mired down in Iraq. Hubris and no common sense.

What are you talking about? You claim Asherman is "full of it," yet your remark bears no resemblance whatsoever to what he said. It appears it is you who is "full of it."

The first thing you can do is read her name Chicken Little!

Vietnamnurse ... that tells you shes been somewhere neither you or Ash have been.

Most importantly, it shows that she is no coward, and unlike you, has served 1) Her country 2) in the military 3) in a fukking war zone.

For someone who hasn't got the balls to even show up, let alone be in an armed conflict, you've got a lot of crust challenging anyone. When you crawl out from under your mommies skirts, step up to the plate and get some courage, you may have the right to open you mouth.

Until then, all you can do is hide under mommies skirts, quiver, and piss your pants like the rest of your ilk!!!

Anon

By reading the name, "Viennamnurse," I'm lead to believe the poster served in the Vietnam War as a nurse, but that does not tell me he is a "she."

Ticomaya wrote:

By reading the name, "Viennamnurse," I'm lead to believe the poster served in the Vietnam War as a nurse, but that does not tell me he is a "she."

Since she's a bit longer on this site than you, Tico, and has been on ABUZZ even a couple of more years ... well, many here know her, not only from the mentioned sites.

Tico,

Surely Anon never said, "I can assure you that I have no phoney concerns for the military ... the more of them that get killed off ... the better!" and "When I heard about Pat Tillman being killed by friendly fire, I about broke a rib from laughing so hard!"

I'm led to believe that Anon is a wounded veteran, and it is hard to conceive that a soldier would applaud the deaths of his comrades in arms. Friendly fire isn't something to joke about either, it has in the past killed almost as many as enemy fire. No, no I can't believe that Anon would take such a stance if he received honorable wounds in his country's service.

I'm sure Anon will clear the whole matter up promptly and to everyone's satisfaction.

Tico,

Surely Anon never said, "I can assure you that I have no phoney concerns for the military ... the more of them that get killed off ... the better!" and "When I heard about Pat Tillman being killed by friendly fire, I about broke a rib from laughing so hard!"

I'm led to believe that Anon is a wounded veteran, and it is hard to conceive that a soldier would applaud the deaths of his comrades in arms. Friendly fire isn't something to joke about either, it has in the past killed almost as many as enemy fire. No, no I can't believe that Anon would take such a stance if he received honorable wounds in his country's service.

I'm sure Anon will clear the whole matter up promptly and to everyone's satisfaction.

I now officially declare this thread to be a train wreck.

Setanta wrote:

I now officially declare this thread to be a train wreck.

btw any idea what Her Majesty's Royal Army is?

Chickenheart,

But at least I SHOWED UP! At least I HAVE EARNED the right to voice my opinions! That's more than you can ever say!! You will forever be a chickenhawk, a no show, a mouth with no backbone, and you will always lack the courage of your convictions! I consider your disdain a badge of honor!

Taking comments out of context shows just what little integrity you have. You constantly show your self centered approach to living, your intellectual dishonesty, and most of all, your bankrupt morality. With citizens like you, it's no wonder this country has become detestable.

Anon

So, Anon ... put the record straight. There is a link that shows you did indeed make the quoted remarks. Would you explain your apparent willingness to see our soldiers killed in large numbers? Why would anyone find it amusing that an American hero died in a friendly fire incident? Those sort of remarks one has come to expect from the Left, and from those who presumably never served in the military.