50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
Francis
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:21 am
It's just dang rhetorics! To steal bread to prevent starvation is plain illegal.

I would like to see these people crying for legality, starving in front of a bakery...
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:22 am
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
The simple FACT is; the majority of illegals would like to "follow the dang rules"...



How is that possible if they start their pursuit of the "American dream" and how can they want to "follow the dang rules" if they start by doing something illegal?
You say that as if they had the option to immigrate legally. Do you really think the majority of illegal aliens wouldn't have preferred to simply get their passports stamped at the border, instead of the sometimes death defying paths they took? For the majority; the only choice was whether or not to remain in poverty indefinitely, or cross illegally. I'm pretty sure what I'd choose. What would you choose?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 09:56 am
Tell me Bill, how many beaners do you have working for you now that has made you so sensitive to their plight? Bet you save a lot of money paying them under the table and not providing health insurance for them, huh? Don't need to worry about immigration because for every one caught, you can find 2 to replace them to wash those dishes.


For the ultra-sensitive of you that will now complain endlessly about my use of the word "beaner", I had not heard that until Carlos Mencia started his show on comedy central, so if you got a complaint, take it to him.

Bill seems to be for an open, revolving door on our borders. Let anyone in and police their actions as we can. I say that's complete and utter bullshite. No country that I know of has an open immigration policy and to suggest that the US should start is a bad idea.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 10:52 am
Your threadbare attempt to attack Bill's character and law-abidance does nothing to support your argument, McGentrix.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 10:58 am
McGentrix wrote:
Tell me Bill, how many beaners do you have working for you now that has made you so sensitive to their plight? Bet you save a lot of money paying them under the table and not providing health insurance for them, huh? Don't need to worry about immigration because for every one caught, you can find 2 to replace them to wash those dishes.
I've never employed a "beaner" you mindless bigot, employ no Mexicans currently, since I have no restaurants, and when I did the average Mexican earned at least a buck more an hour than your average white man (because they were worth the extra dough).


McGentrix wrote:
For the ultra-sensitive of you that will now complain endlessly about my use of the word "beaner", I had not heard that until Carlos Mencia started his show on comedy central, so if you got a complaint, take it to him.
Repeating other's bigoted remarks is NO excuse, bigot. I see now why you hide behind a fake name and a phony avatar. Lash out from the anonymous comfort of the internet, you coward.

McGentrix wrote:
Bill seems to be for an open, revolving door on our borders. Let anyone in and police their actions as we can. I say that's complete and utter bullshite. No country that I know of has an open immigration policy and to suggest that the US should start is a bad idea.
Europe has been progressing towards more open borders and I applaud it. Great societies shouldn't require great walls... and I can think of no great wall in history I'd like to live near. Are you really so incompetent that you require a labour shortage to retain employment? If that's not it; what is?
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 11:03 am
That proves my theory that most proponents of deporting illegal Mexicans
are racists.

As I've stated ever 50 pages or so: the US economy would suffer tremendously without them. Give them guest worker status, they gladly
would pay their taxes and continue to be diligent and loyal workers.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 11:23 am
CJ, That's the same conclusion I came to too! Most of the hard laborers are Mexicans doing works in our restaurants and farms. Without them, our economy would be worse off.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 11:46 am
I don't much care for the guest worker program. Seems a bit too much like sharecropping to me. I find it almost unconscionable to allow a person, let alone a family, to enjoy the life America has to offer, only to jerk the rug out from under them at a later date. Imagine your options being working for McG or cjhsa or going home... A guest worker program seems like a certain ticket to oppression of new second class. That ain't right. That's not what I want for my country.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 12:02 pm
Actually, I find a guest worker program quite fair to all parties involved.
As it stands now, a lot of migrant workers have no rights at all, they work
for peanuts and don't receive any benefits. A guest worker program would allow them benefits and get at least minimum wage.

Yes I know Bill, you pay above minimum wage, but you're not the norm,
others exploit these poor people, and there is nothing they can do. Take it or leave it, is the motto of some employers.

We just cannot use them as cheap laborers and not give them the well
deserved benefits.

Besides that, what solution do you have in mind, Bill?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 12:25 pm
CJ, Ditto; a guest worker program will protect workers vs without it.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 12:39 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
Actually, I find a guest worker program quite fair to all parties involved.
As it stands now, a lot of migrant workers have no rights at all, they work
for peanuts and don't receive any benefits. A guest worker program would allow them benefits and get at least minimum wage.

Yes I know Bill, you pay above minimum wage, but you're not the norm,
others exploit these poor people, and there is nothing they can do. Take it or leave it, is the motto of some employers.

We just cannot use them as cheap laborers and not give them the well
deserved benefits.

Besides that, what solution do you have in mind, Bill?
I see no reason to limit guest visas for law abiding people in any way. On the other thread; Thomas mentioned he signed off on not receiving social benefits, despite paying in for them like everyone else if he works. That strikes me as fair for a probationary period of a few years before granting citizenship. I don't much care if there are English Speaking requirements, or even proven sustained self sustenance requirements before the final step of citizenship is granted; but I can see no good reason a hungry man should have to brave a blazing dessert to get a shitty job (or choose to stay hungry, as the bigots would like to pretend is his other lovely legal option).

Nor do I see any reason already productive law abiding members of this society should be sent someplace that is not and in many cases never was there home. For what? Trespassing? I've committed worse crimes than that (and if any of you bigots want to deport me; it better be to Costa Rica… or pack a lunch. :razz:)

If the bigots who whine about jobs understood the first thing about economics; they'd realize that in a nation where over 75% of the GDP comes from services; more people means more jobs, too. There is no finite amount of money to be had, and when someone else makes some; that doesn't mean the rest of us make less. That's the magical thing about money.

At the end of the day, what I can't see myself doing; is looking at some poor schmuck on the other side of a fence, unemployable because he was born on the wrong side of an arbitrary line in sand and smiling to myself thinking, "Ya, that's what his ass get for not being an American". It may not be racism, but it's bigotry in it's purest form to believe the next guy less worthy of an opportunity to work his way up, because of something as arbitrary as where he was born. I suspect a lot of bigots are just glad to finally have someone lowlier than themselves to look down their noses upon.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 02:45 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
The simple FACT is; the majority of illegals would like to "follow the dang rules"...



How is that possible if they start their pursuit of the "American dream" and how can they want to "follow the dang rules" if they start by doing something illegal?
You say that as if they had the option to immigrate legally. Do you really think the majority of illegal aliens wouldn't have preferred to simply get their passports stamped at the border, instead of the sometimes death defying paths they took? For the majority; the only choice was whether or not to remain in poverty indefinitely, or cross illegally. I'm pretty sure what I'd choose. What would you choose?


If they had a passport,the price of a visa is only $75 American at almost any US Embassy.
If they dont have a passport,then they can still get a visa,it just takes a little longer.

Since all of you seem to want to be "fair",and since a large part of the illegal immigrants come from Mexico,lets do this.

Lets look at how the Mexican govt says they will deal with illegals coming into Mexico,and then make our laws regarding illegal immigrants from Mexico mirror theirs.
That way,they are getting the same treatment that their home govt gives to illegals.

We could do that with EVERY country.
What could be more fair then that?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 02:58 pm
mysteryman wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
The simple FACT is; the majority of illegals would like to "follow the dang rules"...



How is that possible if they start their pursuit of the "American dream" and how can they want to "follow the dang rules" if they start by doing something illegal?
You say that as if they had the option to immigrate legally. Do you really think the majority of illegal aliens wouldn't have preferred to simply get their passports stamped at the border, instead of the sometimes death defying paths they took? For the majority; the only choice was whether or not to remain in poverty indefinitely, or cross illegally. I'm pretty sure what I'd choose. What would you choose?


If they had a passport,the price of a visa is only $75 American at almost any US Embassy.
If they dont have a passport,then they can still get a visa,it just takes a little longer.

Since all of you seem to want to be "fair",and since a large part of the illegal immigrants come from Mexico,lets do this.

Lets look at how the Mexican govt says they will deal with illegals coming into Mexico,and then make our laws regarding illegal immigrants from Mexico mirror theirs.
That way,they are getting the same treatment that their home govt gives to illegals.

We could do that with EVERY country.
What could be more fair then that?
Rolling Eyes Making you wear a dunce cap for asking such a stupid question (again). You never answered my question: What would YOU do if YOUR family was hungry and YOU were on the other side of the line? Would you tell them to shut up and deal with it, because you won't trespass to take that job with your brother? What do you tell that crying baby? What would YOU do?
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:03 pm
OCCOM BILL wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
The simple FACT is; the majority of illegals would like to "follow the dang rules"...



How is that possible if they start their pursuit of the "American dream" and how can they want to "follow the dang rules" if they start by doing something illegal?
You say that as if they had the option to immigrate legally. Do you really think the majority of illegal aliens wouldn't have preferred to simply get their passports stamped at the border, instead of the sometimes death defying paths they took? For the majority; the only choice was whether or not to remain in poverty indefinitely, or cross illegally. I'm pretty sure what I'd choose. What would you choose?


If they had a passport,the price of a visa is only $75 American at almost any US Embassy.
If they dont have a passport,then they can still get a visa,it just takes a little longer.

Since all of you seem to want to be "fair",and since a large part of the illegal immigrants come from Mexico,lets do this.

Lets look at how the Mexican govt says they will deal with illegals coming into Mexico,and then make our laws regarding illegal immigrants from Mexico mirror theirs.
That way,they are getting the same treatment that their home govt gives to illegals.

We could do that with EVERY country.
What could be more fair then that?
Rolling Eyes Making you wear a dunce cap for asking such a stupid question (again). You never answered my question: What would YOU do if YOUR family was hungry and YOU were on the other side of the line? Would you tell them to shut up and deal with it, because you won't trespass to take that job with your brother? What do you tell that crying baby? What would YOU do?


Its not unfair to use other countries laws against their own citizens.

As to your hypothetical question,its not possible to answer that.
I have never been in that situation,and unless you have its not possible to answer it.

I know that I would do whatever it took to support my family,and I hope it would be short of breaking the law.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:10 pm
mysteryman wrote:
Its not unfair to use other countries laws against their own citizens.


Yeah, you're absolutely right. It's not unfair. Actually, all the Western democracies should finally stop this ridiculous behaviour of trying to be better than other nations. What good has ever come out of that?

If there are Chinese illegals in the US, let's look at how China deals with these problems and then exactly imitate what they are doing! That will teach them that it's not worth leaving their country in the first place! And if a woman from Saudi Arabia breaks a law in the US, we should really look to how the Saudis would deal with that problem and act exactly the same way! Publicly cutting of a body part wouldn't be such a bad idea, after all...

Really, we just have to stop these idiotic notions about "compassion" and trying to better ourselves. No.

Let's just be "fair". That would be great.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:11 pm
Bill, you really shouldn't refer to others as stupid and bigots. Your unsupported statements that we can take in, without pain, billions more, and solve all clean water problems with desalination, are incredibly stupid.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:30 pm
mysteryman wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
OCCOM BILL wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
Quote:
The simple FACT is; the majority of illegals would like to "follow the dang rules"...



How is that possible if they start their pursuit of the "American dream" and how can they want to "follow the dang rules" if they start by doing something illegal?
You say that as if they had the option to immigrate legally. Do you really think the majority of illegal aliens wouldn't have preferred to simply get their passports stamped at the border, instead of the sometimes death defying paths they took? For the majority; the only choice was whether or not to remain in poverty indefinitely, or cross illegally. I'm pretty sure what I'd choose. What would you choose?


If they had a passport,the price of a visa is only $75 American at almost any US Embassy.
If they dont have a passport,then they can still get a visa,it just takes a little longer.

Since all of you seem to want to be "fair",and since a large part of the illegal immigrants come from Mexico,lets do this.

Lets look at how the Mexican govt says they will deal with illegals coming into Mexico,and then make our laws regarding illegal immigrants from Mexico mirror theirs.
That way,they are getting the same treatment that their home govt gives to illegals.

We could do that with EVERY country.
What could be more fair then that?
Rolling Eyes Making you wear a dunce cap for asking such a stupid question (again). You never answered my question: What would YOU do if YOUR family was hungry and YOU were on the other side of the line? Would you tell them to shut up and deal with it, because you won't trespass to take that job with your brother? What do you tell that crying baby? What would YOU do?


Its not unfair to use other countries laws against their own citizens.

As to your hypothetical question,its not possible to answer that.
I have never been in that situation,and unless you have its not possible to answer it.

I know that I would do whatever it took to support my family,and I hope it would be short of breaking the law.
I think you know damn well what you'd do. You're a stand up guy. No way you're assuming if you were born on the other side you'd be to scared do the right thing. Sounds funny doesn't it? Your idea of the wrong thing is suddenly, undeniably, the right thing. Perhaps you should try just a little bit harder to empathize with the millions of people who really do have to make that choice. An adjustment on your position would be an honorable thing as well. We are all members of the human race. Remember?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:38 pm
Advocate wrote:
Bill, you really shouldn't refer to others as stupid and bigots. Your unsupported statements that we can take in, without pain, billions more, and solve all clean water problems with desalination, are incredibly stupid.
Laughing Ironic those are your accusations in this post. Don't try to saddle me with your paraphrases... you don't have the capacity by half. Desalination has been a reality since before we had a country. Rolling Eyes It is already done in many places on massive scales. Your denial of this simple truth betrays your ignorance as well as your satisfaction with it. Try googling the subject before stick your other foot in your as.. mouth. Rolling Eyes You're real close to the grease monkey. One information-less post after another.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:42 pm
MM wrote:
Its not unfair to use other countries laws against their own citizens.

correct, it's just stupid.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 May, 2007 03:49 pm
dyslexia wrote:
MM wrote:
Its not unfair to use other countries laws against their own citizens.

correct, it's just stupid.


On the other hand, it's perhaps the invention of an innovative new legal system.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 08/25/2025 at 05:22:30