50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 07:13 am
And in NM ...

http://i3.tinypic.com/67njrdg.jpg
Quote:
Activists Target Domenici, Bingaman

source: Albuquerque Journal, 16.05.07, page C1
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 07:55 am
I guess that will settle the staus of the 12 million now in the US and lay the ground work for the next 12 million ten years from now.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Wed 16 May, 2007 04:57 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Senate nearing immigration bill

Quote:
Senators negotiating a bipartisan immigration reform bill have settled on the details of a plan that would immediately grant legal status to all illegal immigrants currently in the United States.


Evil or Very Mad
Quote:
But at some point, the heads of households with Z visas would have to return to his or her home country and then reenter the United States. They would have to take their Z visa to the U.S. Embassy or consulate and would be guaranteed reentry
Point A to Point B to get a guaranteed entry to Point A = IDIOCY. Perhaps we should make them jump through "Hoops of Fire" while we're at it. Who does this serve?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 08:26 am
The process of permanent entry should be as excruciating as possible to discourage more illegals from entering the country. An easy path to a green card would bring in untold more illegals flooding the country, which will certainly bring discord.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 10:10 am
Advocate, I agree; the illegals should have to go through hoops to win citizenship, especially much tougher then the ones trying to get in legally. That to me is only fair and equitable.
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 10:29 am
It took 13 years for a friend of mine from Canada to get here. She's not at all bitter, but has the attitude of "it was worth the wait - and the hoops".

Her son and daughter-in-law are still waiting.

She's never said anything about the current situation (amnesty talk). Probably doesn't want to be labeled a "bigot".
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 11:25 am
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 04:35 pm
Anyone wanna place a bet on how long it takes till someone forges a "Z" visa?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 04:38 pm
Last night I was listening to somebody--can't remember who--it was on a station I don't usually listen to--wanting to know that if the illegal using your social security number starts drawing social security before you are eligible, what happens to you when you apply? Does anybody know?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 04:39 pm
Is that anything like US currency forgeries? LOL
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 04:59 pm
Immigration Burden or Boom for Tax Rolls?Immigration Burden or Boom for Tax Rolls?
By ERIC HORNG
May 17, 2007

Senators reached a landmark deal on immigration today that will give 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States the opportunity to obtain legal status. The compromise crafted by key senators also calls for increased border security to prevent new illegal immigrants from pouring into the country.

The proposed legislation would allow immigrants to obtain a probationary card right away and to ultimately obtain a "Z-visa" that would put them on track to permanent residency.


What does this new agreement mean for America? Overcrowded classrooms and emergency rooms. Overwhelmed police and fire departments. Bankrupt Social Security, Medicare and welfare programs. Skyrocketing taxes.

It's a gloomy scenario that some say could become a reality if millions of illegal immigrants are granted citizenship under a sweeping immigration reform bill currently working its way through the U.S. Senate. But is it fact or fear-mongering?

"This is the most expensive public policy choice that I've seen in Washington in a quarter-century," said Robert Rector of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "You're essentially going to grant illegal immigrants eligibility to Social Security, to Medicare, to other welfare programs for the elderly like Medicaid … at the cost to the taxpayer of $17,000 more per illegal immigrant."

Rector bases his calculations not on the 12 million illegal immigrants currently in the United States who could be provided a pathway to citizenship over the next few years, as outlined in the bill, but on the millions more people Rector believes would seek citizenship in the next 20 years as a result of a change in policy.

Many of these new Americans, Rector argues, would be be poor, less-educated and pay thousands per year less in taxes than what they would cost the government in services.

"Each immigrant who does not have a high school degree over his lifetime costs the taxpayer about $1.2 million, and that's all the benefits his family would receive minus the taxes he pays in," said Rector.

But others say those figures overstate the impact, and one group even called the Heritage Foundation's assessment "dehumanizing."

"Human beings are made up of much more than a tally of their income taxes and the tally of the services they use," said Benjamin Johnson of the American Immigration Law Foundation, who cited the contributions of such accomplished high school dropouts as business titans Ray Kroc, Dave Thomas and Kirk Kerkorian.

"It's an indictment of people who are doing really valuable jobs in our economy and being very productive members of our economy," said Johnson, who highlighted the consumer purchasing power and job-creating influence of Hispanics in the United States, estimating their economic contribution at $798 billion in 2006.


Still, the strain on some services is already being felt.

The Texas Hospital Association reported a 30 percent increase in emergency room visits between 1997 and 2005, partly due to the flood of illegal immigrants, many of whom have no health insurance and are unable to pay for services.

"Because somebody becomes a citizen, it doesn't necessarily mean they're suddenly going to have insurance coverage," said THA spokeswoman Amanda Engler. "While granting citizenship status to undocumented immigrants will not guarantee health care coverage, it may create new strains on programs like Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program."
But Juan Onesimo Sandoval, a professor of urban sociology at Northwestern University, said immigration reform could actually add money to government coffers.

"You're going to get people who are getting paid, but because they don't have documentation, it doesn't get reported," said Sandoval. "You're going to see some increase in taxes that they're paying, and once they become part of the formal market, they're going to be paying into Social Security, and so will their employers."

Sandoval also said the future economic contribution of the children and grandchildren of such immigrants could be vital.

"Their taxes are going to be far more important to our economy than their parents' taxes are," said Sandoval, who suggests a wave of new immigrant citizens could help support the aging population in the United States, as some believe it's done in Europe. "In terms of demographics, Latinos tend to be a younger population, so they're going to be part of a work force that will be supporting the Medicaid programs and all these senior programs. As a proportion, they'll be paying more and more of these taxes."
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:00 pm
Foxfyre,

This bill seems to be what you were saying you wanted a while back. There is the touchback provision, a $5,000 fine, the need to learn English and go to the end of the line.

My side is going to have a bit of trouble with size of the fine ($5000 is a lot of money for poor people and the touchback is a punitive measure). I think we are going to get on board with this as a compromise.

The one thing my side is going to have trouble accepting (and I think you will see most of the pressure for amendments on this issue) is the temporary guest workers with no chance for citizenship.

Temporary guest workers, of course, are here legally to work. The fact that they are temporary (meaning they have less rights and no future) makes them exceptionally bad for American workers. Any worker would rather compete against citizens, or at least workers with full rights, then with people who have to keep quiet to keep their job for even the limited time they have it.

This doesn't have anything to do with illegal immigration, but it is something that people in my camp are going to try to fix.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:01 pm
Au,

You find the silliest articles! Good work.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:05 pm
ebrown, We hope you're in a position to fix those things that have been broken for too long. Congresss has meandered on this issue for too long, and it has only exacerbated the problems we now see and hear about. One step at a time is good enough for me just as long as solutions are forthcoming in the near future. Quit making laws if you ain't gonna enforce them; that's the least congress can do.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:07 pm
That part about the children of immigrants helping our country is a truism most people do not appreciate. That's the reason why Germany and Japan are in worse straights when it comes to their demographics and future economy.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:15 pm
Who will pay for the social services these people will be afforded. Since in the main they are low wage earners paying very little if any tax and be eligable for every government handout availabe.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:42 pm
au, I believe it's really unfair to generalize about how immigrant's "do not pay for social services." After all, we are all "immigrants" to some degree.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 05:55 pm
C.I.
I am not generalizing. The illegals from Mexico and points south are for the most part uneducated and are employed in jobs on the lowest rung of the ladder. They will pay little if any income tax and will demand the most in the way of social services. Who do you think will pay the freight .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 17 May, 2007 06:28 pm
au, I know it's only anecdotal, but our maid is from San Salvador, and she's been going to school to learn nursing. I also know that many of the restaurants in our area hire Mexicans to do everything from dishwashing to cooking. They provide a necessary work force in the industry here, and I'm pretty sure it's not an isolated case. The farms around Gilroy, Salinas, and Monterey all use Mexican laborers. Who eles would work those fields? They provide the necessary labor that would otherwise go unfulfilled. We must help their children get the education they need to advance themselves to better jobs that our country sorely needs for our economic future.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 18 May, 2007 12:19 am
We do have similar problems in the EU ...

Quote:
EU crackdown to target employers of illegal migrants

· Spot checks to quadruple under Europe-wide law
· Nannies and gardeners included in legislation


Ian Traynor in Brussels
Thursday May 17, 2007
The Guardian

Hundreds of thousands of middle-class people across Europe could be fined for using nannies, gardeners or plumbers if they have not asked for proof that the workers are in the country legally.
Under a crackdown on the exploitation of illegal immigrants, companies and individuals taking advantage of black-market labour would be criminalised.

Police spot-checks on company workforces would be at least quadrupled and illegal migrants would be encouraged to lodge complaints about unscrupulous employers.

Companies and individuals would be responsible for certifying an employee's legal status and would have to prove they were being decently treated and remunerated to escape fines or criminal prosecution.
It was not clear how the huge market in household help would be policed. "We want to avoid safe havens for the exploitation of migrants," said Franco Frattini, the EU commissioner responsible for immigration. "Europe is no longer tolerating the black labour of migrants. We have to change."

Employers who have not checked on the status of immigrant employees could be fined, made to forfeit EU subsidies (substantial in the case of European farmers who commonly employ immigrant field workers), be disqualified from public contracts, and made to repay outstanding wages, taxes, and welfare contributions.

More serious offenders, meaning those employing four or more illegal migrants, knowingly exploiting the victims of human traffickers, or with a record of repeat offences, could be jailed.

The EU commission estimates there are up to eight million illegal immigrants in the EU, entering at the rate of up to half a million a year.

The draft legislation, which needs to be agreed by members states and the European parliament to become European law, aims to standardise approaches to the issue across the union.

"There are practically no controls," said Mr Frattini. "We can no longer tolerate this situation."

He conceded that Britain might have a problem accepting "European criminal sanctions".

British officials said the proposals were interesting and welcomed the crackdown on employers taking advantage of illegal labour. But Britain has an opt-out on EU criminal justice regimes and had not yet decided on whether to take part.

"That's a decision yet to be taken," said a British official.

Separate from the legislation, Mr Frattini indicated that Brussels wanted to act as a clearing house for the seasonal and migrant labour markets in Europe, reaching agreements on the admission and repatriation of migrant labour from countries in Africa or eastern Europe and matching demand from individual EU countries with supply from the third countries.
Source
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 08/24/2025 at 06:29:12