What should be done about illegal immigration?

Browne
If you go to an emergency room and have resources. I may be wrong however I believe you will get a bill in the mail.

IF WE CAN COME HERE AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY AND MURDEROUSLY, WHY DO WE CARE IF THEY WANT TO MOVE HERE AND BE PRODUCTIVE MEMBERS OF OUR SOCIETY, PEACEFULLY?

can you answer that? i highly doubt it. its hypocritical and unethical , but we're all for it so it seems.

(The ungratefulness of the uninsured. Go figure.)

au1929 wrote:

Browne
If you go to an emergency room and have resources. I may be wrong however I believe you will get a bill in the mail.

Not only will you get a bill in the mail but you will be considerably harrassed and hounded to pay it and turned over for collection if you resist and will see your credit score diminished considerably.

Foxfyre wrote:

au1929 wrote:

Browne
If you go to an emergency room and have resources. I may be wrong however I believe you will get a bill in the mail.

Not only will you get a bill in the mail but you will be considerably harrassed and hounded to pay it and turned over for collection if you resist and will see your credit score diminished considerably.

Do you think they pester illegals less?

I've known quite a few employers who've employd tons of illegals, and I'd wager the majority collect taxes for them just as they do the legals.

Tell me Foxy, if security is your concern, why are you against Mexican's having medical emergencies treated? Are you afraid a terrorist is going to dress up as a Mexican and blow up a hospital?

What point do you think I missed?

OCCOM BILL wrote:

What point do you think I missed?

How about starting with the one I asked you to back up with a quote?

Foxfyre wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:

What point do you think I missed?

How about starting with the one I asked you to back up with a quote?

I'm trying... that's what I commented on... but apparently I misunderstood? Or didn't I?

OCCOM BILL wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:

What point do you think I missed?

How about starting with the one I asked you to back up with a quote?

I'm trying... that's what I commented on... but apparently I misunderstood? Or didn't I?

I think you have misunderstood most of the pro-enforcement side of this entire debate. When you by implication accuse me of wanting to deny emergency treatment to Mexicans, that is not only dishonest and unprovable but I think it is also a red herring intended to deflect the discussion from the actual issue being discussed. I think you have intentionally avoided the issues being discussed and rather bring in unrelated issues or invent issues that are easier for you to attack.

Foxfyre wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:

OCCOM BILL wrote:

What point do you think I missed?

How about starting with the one I asked you to back up with a quote?

I'm trying... that's what I commented on... but apparently I misunderstood? Or didn't I?

I think you have misunderstood most of the pro-enforcement side of this entire debate. When you by implication accuse me of wanting to deny emergency treatment to Mexicans, that is not only dishonest and unprovable but I think it is also a red herring intended to deflect the discussion from the actual issue being discussed. I think you have intentionally avoided the issues being discussed and rather bring in unrelated issues or invent issues that are easier for you to attack.

Fox, are you retarded?

I commented clearly in favor of emergency treatment for illegals, which others were commenting clearly opposed to... and you seemed to snidely comment that I had missed the point.

If that's true; tell me what the friggin point is, and I'll be able to answer your question. In other words: end the idiotic dance, answer the question and I'll be happy to explain why, if my statement was out of line and retract it if need be.

Obill posted in Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 10:02 am Post: 2646143 -
Tell me Foxy, if security is your concern, why are you against Mexican's having medical emergencies treated? Are you afraid a terrorist is going to dress up as a Mexican and blow up a hospital?

Ps. Why don't you put you sig in your sig line like everyone else?

nobody was making any point opposing emergency treatment for illegals or Mexicans. They WERE commenting on the point in the letter that legal immigrants and citizens can't expect free medical treatment, emergency or otherwise, that the law requires to be furnished to the illegals no questions asked.

I know it is a subtlety difficult for some to discern, but that was one of the reasons the writer of the letter wanted to become illegal.

We were neither discussing security (red herring) nor have I at any time even suggesting Mexicans or anybody else should not have medical emergencies treated. That's what I asked you to either prove or retract. And as for a terrorist dressing up as a Mexican and blowing up a hospital, you can't build a much bigger red herring than that.

Quote:

Ps. Why don't you put you sig in your sig line like everyone else?

I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about here.

Foxfyre wrote:

Quote:

Ps. Why don't you put you sig in your sig line like everyone else?

I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about here.

How could you not? Your must be taking an extra step to add the text quoted below to your every post; though why I have no idea...

OGIONIK wrote:

IF WE CAN COME HERE AND TAKE THIS COUNTRY ILLEGALLY AND MURDEROUSLY, WHY DO WE CARE IF THEY WANT TO MOVE HERE AND BE PRODUCTIVE MEMBERS OF OUR SOCIETY, PEACEFULLY?

can you answer that? i highly doubt it. its hypocritical and unethical , but we're all for it so it seems.

If someone wants to move into your house and sit at your table without permission or even asking would you object if they were productive members of society.

What would you say if we allowed all to enter but refused to give them food stamps, emergency medical treatment, education to their children, and any social services?