OCCOM BILL wrote:Foxfyre wrote:OCCOM BILL wrote:Foxfyre wrote:OCCOM BILL wrote:
What point do you think I missed?
How about starting with the one I asked you to back up with a quote?
I'm trying... that's what I commented on... but apparently I misunderstood? Or didn't I?
I think you have misunderstood most of the pro-enforcement side of this entire debate. When you by implication accuse me of wanting to deny emergency treatment to Mexicans, that is not only dishonest and unprovable but I think it is also a red herring intended to deflect the discussion from the actual issue being discussed. I think you have intentionally avoided the issues being discussed and rather bring in unrelated issues or invent issues that are easier for you to attack.
Fox, are you retarded?
Possibly but at least I can read what people write. You seem to be having a problem with that lately.
Quote:I commented clearly in favor of emergency treatment for illegals, which others were commenting clearly opposed to... and you seemed to snidely comment that I had missed the point.
That's absolutely correct. But I wasn't snide at all. I was quite straight forward that you missed the point when you said anybody was opposed to emergency treatment for illegals or, more specifically, Mexicans which I think you made a particular point of bringing into the mix. I'll say it again: nobody was making any point opposing emergency treatment for illegals or Mexicans. They WERE commenting on the point in the letter that legal immigrants and citizens can't expect free medical treatment, emergency or otherwise, that the law requires to be furnished to the illegals no questions asked. I know it is a subtlety difficult for some to discern, but that was one of the reasons the writer of the letter wanted to become illegal.
Quote:If that's true; tell me what the friggin point is, and I'll be able to answer your question. In other words: end the idiotic dance, answer the question and I'll be happy to explain why, if my statement was out of line and retract it if need be.
Okay here:
Quote:Obill posted in Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 10:02 am Post: 2646143 -
Tell me Foxy, if security is your concern, why are you against Mexican's having medical emergencies treated? Are you afraid a terrorist is going to dress up as a Mexican and blow up a hospital?
We were neither discussing security (red herring) nor have I at any time even suggesting Mexicans or anybody else should not have medical emergencies treated. That's what I asked you to either prove or retract. And as for a terrorist dressing up as a Mexican and blowing up a hospital, you can't build a much bigger red herring than that.
Quote:Ps. Why don't you put you sig in your sig line like everyone else?
I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about here.
_________________
--Foxfyre
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I?-
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.