50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 12:00 am
The truth is the United States has benefitted greatly from the waves of immigrants who began coming here in the early 19th century -- in approximate order of the successive waves, they were Scotch-Irish, German, Chinese, Scandinavian, Czech, Hungarian, Irish, Japanese, Polish, Ashkenazi Jews (mostly from Imperial Russia), Italians, Arab and Syrian immigrants (after the fall of the Ottoman Empire), and more recently Puerto Ricans, (though as U.S. citizens they are not political immigrants), Cubans, Mexicans and Central Americans from El Salvador, Nicaragua and Guatemala -- and others I have failed to note. Nearly all of them were labelled by contemporary "natives" as ignorant, often criminal and representative of alien cultures. Many suffered severe discrimination for a generation or so, but all assimilated, adding new elements to the cosmopolitan culture, and energy and competition to our collective economic and social lives.

It is more than merely interesting that the offspring of the Jewish and Oriental immigrants who were once decried as hopelessly ignorant peasants crowded into hopeless urban slums filled with crime and violence, now dominate the competitive entrance classes to our best universities. Often unnoticed behind all the (counterproductive in my view) affirmative action programs for black Americans, is the rapidly growing and advancing Black middle class, which is rapidly filling the professions and business leadership ranks of the country. After generations of institutional racism which held them back, they too are following the familiar path.

The scare rhetoric offered today with respect to new immigrants is merely the tired old stuff offered many times before -- and always proven wrong.

Immigrants are largely the self-selected salt of the earth. They have provided immense benefit to this country. They keep us young, competitive and creative. We need all we can get.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 12:05 am
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Imagine the braying protests we would hear from the Left if Americans flooded into Mexico and attempted to transform it into US-South.


They can'z, because those more than 1 million expatriate Americans in Mexico assimalted quickly, learnt Spanish within the shortest time, became Catholics, and live like their Latino neighbours in small adobe villages ...
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 12:09 am
Top Ten Foreign Countries - Foreign Born Population Among U.S. Immigrants
Country #/year 2000 2004 2010 2010, %
Canada 24,200 678,000 774,800 920,000 2.3%
China 50,900 1,391,000 1,594,600 1,900,000 4.7%
Cuba 14,800 952,000 1,011,200 1,100,000 2.7%
Dominican Republic 24,900 692,000 791,600 941,000 2.3%
El Salvador 33,500 765,000 899,000 1,100,000 2.7%
India 59,300 1,007,000 1,244,200 1,600,000 4.0%
Korea 17,900 701,000 772,600 880,000 2.2%
Mexico 175,900 7,841,000 8,544,600 9,600,000 23.7%
Philippines 47,800 1,222,000 1,413,200 1,700,000 4.2%
Ireland 33,700 863,000 997,800 1,200,000 3.0%
Total Pop. Top 10 498,900 16,112,000 18,747,600 21,741,000 53.7%
Total Foreign Born 940,000 31,100,000 34,860,000 40,500,000 100%
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 09:18 am
I think all these illegal immigrants really want to go to Germany.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 09:50 am
georgeob1 wrote:
...Many suffered severe discrimination for a generation or so, but all assimilated, adding new elements to the cosmopolitan culture, and energy and competition to our collective economic and social lives.......Immigrants are largely the self-selected salt of the earth. They have provided immense benefit to this country. They keep us young, competitive and creative. We need all we can get.

I agree. It's only the illegal immigrants whom I object to. I think it an odd suggestion to simply ignore violations of the law, as though there were no law. I don't know a lot of countries that don't claim the right to control whom they admit and when.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:17 am
georgeob1 wrote:
The truth is the United States has benefitted greatly from the waves of immigrants who began coming here in the early 19th century -- in approximate order of the successive waves, they were Scotch-Irish, German, Chinese, Scandinavian, Czech, Hungarian, Irish, Japanese, Polish, Ashkenazi Jews (mostly from Imperial Russia), Italians, Arab and Syrian immigrants (after the fall of the Ottoman Empire), and more recently Puerto Ricans, (though as U.S. citizens they are not political immigrants), Cubans, Mexicans and Central Americans from El Salvador, Nicaragua and Guatemala -- and others I have failed to note. Nearly all of them were labelled by contemporary "natives" as ignorant, often criminal and representative of alien cultures. Many suffered severe discrimination for a generation or so, but all assimilated, adding new elements to the cosmopolitan culture, and energy and competition to our collective economic and social lives.

It is more than merely interesting that the offspring of the Jewish and Oriental immigrants who were once decried as hopelessly ignorant peasants crowded into hopeless urban slums filled with crime and violence, now dominate the competitive entrance classes to our best universities. Often unnoticed behind all the (counterproductive in my view) affirmative action programs for black Americans, is the rapidly growing and advancing Black middle class, which is rapidly filling the professions and business leadership ranks of the country. After generations of institutional racism which held them back, they too are following the familiar path.

The scare rhetoric offered today with respect to new immigrants is merely the tired old stuff offered many times before -- and always proven wrong.

Immigrants are largely the self-selected salt of the earth. They have provided immense benefit to this country. They keep us young, competitive and creative. We need all we can get.


To George, one of my favorite, most respected, and appreciated members on A2K, please note!!!!!

Nobody here, and I think I can speak quite competently for all the pro-border-control, anti-illegal group here, NOBODY is against immigration or immigrants. All of us want to improve the system to make it easier for people to immigrate. There isn't a single one of us who gives a flying fig what race, ethnic group, nationality etc. etc. etc. immigrants are. Trying to couch this in a racist format is to simply change the subject.

There are people coming in that should not be here. These are the criminals, the sociopathic, the terrorists, those who want to overythrow America, those who want to diminish America, those who want to make America into something very different from what it is. We want immigration policies that will help us better identify and weed these people out while allowing in law abiding temporary workers and/or good people who will become good American citizens.

It is not about race, ethnicity, or nationality, and
there is nothing anti immigrant about wanting to control
our borders and who will be allowed to be in our
country legally.

There are good people who have been waiting for years to enter the country legally. Some of these should have been here years ago and they would have blessed us all far sooner than has been the case. Some of these are in Mexico even. We want improved policies to expedite the process of immigration for people like this, and we object to anybody who has chosen to hurry up the process by not entering the country illegally to have any advantage on admission and/or a path to citizenship ahead of those who are doing it legally.

It is not about race, ethnicity, or nationality, and
there is nothing anti immigrant about wanting to
control our borders and who will be allowed to be
in our country legally.

To allow those who are already here illegally to stay is to encourage more illegality. Twice before we have offered amnesty to those who come out of the shadows and have allowed them to stay while promising better border enforcement. Both times the illegals have surged into the country in hugely larger numbers.

To think doing it again will somehow not have the same effect is simply insane. It's like putting a huge neon flashing sign over America. Come on in, and if you can avoid detection for just a little while, the Americans will let you stay forever. Far better to have a sensible re-entry program in place--a re-entry program that would include all those who have been on the waiting list for years. Give the illegals a 30-day grace period to go home and then apply for re-entry. Such re-entry would require each family to have a job waiting for them here, etc. etc., but there would be no other roadblocks for those who could pass a reasonable background check. Anybody unwilling to agree to that process would still be subject to deportation and, if caught, would never be eligible for either temporary work permit or a path to citizenship.

It is not about race, nationality, or ethnicity and
there is nothing anti immigrant in wanting to
control our borders and who will be allowed to
be here legally.

The alternative is to effectively open our borders and let anybody who wants to come on in, no questions asked, and make of this country whatever they wish to make of it. The pro-border control, pro-immigration control group thinks we should know who is here and why they are here, and we think immigration policies should be improved, streamlined, and enforced in a way that good people can come at a pace in which they can be assimilated seamlessly into the American culture and thereby bless us all.

It is not about race, nationality, or ethnicity and
there is nothing anti immigrant in wanting to
control our borders and who will be allowed to
be in this country legally.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:17 am
cjhsa wrote:
I think all these illegal immigrants really want to go to Germany.



You mean, because the wall and the border fences were demolished in 1989 or do you kmow of any other specific reason?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:20 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
cjhsa wrote:
I think all these illegal immigrants really want to go to Germany.



You mean, because the wall and the border fences were demolished in 1989 or do you kmow of any other specific reason?


I do. It's because so many of the Germans think the USA should allow them all in no questions asked, that we can't imagine you wouldn't invite them there, no questions asked. It would save us billions of dollars to buy all the illegals a one-way ticket to Germany. Are you okay with that?
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:23 am
Good old European attitude.

Don't do as I do. Do as I say!!!!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:30 am
Foxfyre wrote:
It would save us billions of dollars to buy all the illegals a one-way ticket to Germany. Are you okay with that?


Generally: yes. If it would last a bit, that would be nice.

(We are still paying for getting 16.8 million new citizens 'incorporated' as well as getting the infrastructure for 41,828 sq miles completely up to modern standards )

We do have such experiences (got it when we had to integrate more than 2 mio refugees after WWII) so ... in some years, with pleasure.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:37 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
It would save us billions of dollars to buy all the illegals a one-way ticket to Germany. Are you okay with that?


Generally: yes. If it would last a bit, that would be nice.

(We are still paying for getting 16.8 million new citizens 'incorporated' as well as getting the infrastructure for 41,828 sq miles completely up to modern standards )

Question, Are these 16.8 million new citizens you refer to East Germans? If so how hard could it be assimilating Germans into Germany?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:38 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
It would save us billions of dollars to buy all the illegals a one-way ticket to Germany. Are you okay with that?


Generally: yes. If it would last a bit, that would be nice.

(We are still paying for getting 16.8 million new citizens 'incorporated' as well as getting the infrastructure for 41,828 sq miles completely up to modern standards )

We do have such experiences (got it when we had to integrate more than 2 mio refugees after WWII) so ... in some years, with pleasure.


Well then okay. If you guys want them, then we'll send you anybody who doesn't want to be here legally. You get what you want and solves our problem re what to do with them.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 10:48 am
au1929 wrote:
Question, Are these 16.8 million new citizens you refer to East Germans? If so how hard could it be assimilating Germans into Germany?


They lived for more than 40 years in a communist country. Before, they lived 12 years under Nazi dictatorship.
Only very few had ever lived in a democracy, and then only as children.

They knew nothing about how life in a free is alike .... óver days and days, weeks long, ... ...

And getting 16.8 new citizen from one day to the other ... well, it certainly could have worked better.
But I doubt that you, au, have a practicable idea what we could have done better - under the prevailing circumstances.

They were, however, neither illegals nor refugees. No topic here.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:03 pm
au1929 wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
It would save us billions of dollars to buy all the illegals a one-way ticket to Germany. Are you okay with that?


Generally: yes. If it would last a bit, that would be nice.

(We are still paying for getting 16.8 million new citizens 'incorporated' as well as getting the infrastructure for 41,828 sq miles completely up to modern standards )


Question, Are these 16.8 million new citizens you refer to East Germans? If so how hard could it be assimilating Germans into Germany?



Do you think "assimilation" has only to do with language? At the time of the Reunification, the Federal Republic of Germany had a population of roughly 60 million people. The German Democratic Republic had a population of about 17 million people. That's about 28 percent of the Western German population.

In relation to America, it would mean that a communist country with a population of 85 million people would join the United States. Now let me find a communist country of 85 million people..... Vietnam!

Now, would it be okay with you if Vietnam would join the US tomorrow, just provided they were all fluent in English? Because that's the dimension we're talking about here.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:25 pm
old europe wrote:
au1929 wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
It would save us billions of dollars to buy all the illegals a one-way ticket to Germany. Are you okay with that?


Generally: yes. If it would last a bit, that would be nice.

(We are still paying for getting 16.8 million new citizens 'incorporated' as well as getting the infrastructure for 41,828 sq miles completely up to modern standards )


Question, Are these 16.8 million new citizens you refer to East Germans? If so how hard could it be assimilating Germans into Germany?



Do you think "assimilation" has only to do with language? At the time of the Reunification, the Federal Republic of Germany had a population of roughly 60 million people. The German Democratic Republic had a population of about 17 million people. That's about 28 percent of the Western German population.

In relation to America, it would mean that a communist country with a population of 85 million people would join the United States. Now let me find a communist country of 85 million people..... Vietnam!

Now, would it be okay with you if Vietnam would join the US tomorrow, just provided they were all fluent in English? Because that's the dimension we're talking about here.


Aside from the same language, they had the same history and heritage. I might add they were for the most part well educated. The same comparison can not be made with the illegals entering the US. In addition this was the reuniting of a nation not an alien invasion.

I would add your Viet Nam analogy is way off base and in no way comprable to the reuniting of Germany.
However, that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:27 pm
More importantly it was the reuniting of a country that had been artifically divided by third parties and in which the reuniting was the desire of the divided people of both divisions.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:28 pm
au1929 wrote:
Aside from the same language, they had the same history and heritage. I might add they were for the most part well educated. The same comparison can not be made with the illegals entering the US. In addition this was the reuniting of a nation not an alien invasion.

I would add your Viet Nam analogy is way off base and in no way comprable to the reuniting of Germany.
However, that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.


Well, it has nothing to do with the subject here but shows quite a bit of ignorance, understandable for an American, though.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:32 pm
It has everything to do with the discussion in this thread. How in the world can you dispute what Au said? Did the "West" Germans forcibly assimile the "East" Germans or did the "East" Germans forcibly resume citizenship in all of Germany against the wishes of the West Germans? This is the difference between what happened in Germany and invasion by people who have NEVER been part of this country and who are not wanted here without first going through due process. And for you to insinuate that Au is ignorant on this subject, you'll have to show how what he said is in any way inaccurate. He wasn't citing a history course. He was making a single observation.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:34 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
au1929 wrote:
Aside from the same language, they had the same history and heritage. I might add they were for the most part well educated. The same comparison can not be made with the illegals entering the US. In addition this was the reuniting of a nation not an alien invasion.

I would add your Viet Nam analogy is way off base and in no way comprable to the reuniting of Germany.
However, that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.


Well, it has nothing to do with the subject here but shows quite a bit of ignorance, understandable for an American, though.


No if there is any ignorance it is on your side of the water. In trying compare the illegal alien situation in the US with the reuniting of a nation.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Mar, 2007 03:37 pm
A better analogy would be the uniting of Mexico and the United States to be a single country. That would pose difficulties similar to the reuniting of "East" and "West" Germany after being separate countries for a long time. But that would be in no way comparable to Mexico's problem with illegal invasion of people from Central and South America or our problem with an illegal invasion of people from Mexico and/or elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 08/16/2025 at 07:51:40