50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:03 pm
Ebrown I did find the table you were looking for on Page 5 and though the numbers on the overall bulletin are somewhat different than what is reflected on the US Dept of Justice main website, I will agree that the table does put the numbers from the other sites in question.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:08 pm
Foxfyre wrote:

I'm sure there's a link somewhere on the New Mexico site. They usually don't post everything state officials say there though.


I couln't find it in the Albuquerque Tribune (print edition) nor the Santa Fe Times (online)
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:18 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:

I'm sure there's a link somewhere on the New Mexico site. They usually don't post everything state officials say there though.


I couln't find it in the Albuquerque Tribune (print edition) nor the Santa Fe Times (online)

I'm sure foxfyre heard it somewhere. I mean like no one just pulls data out of their head without solid footiing, right Foxfyre?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:21 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:

I'm sure there's a link somewhere on the New Mexico site. They usually don't post everything state officials say there though.


I couln't find it in the Albuquerque Tribune (print edition) nor the Santa Fe Times (online)


I don't know. I heard her talking about it on the radio or a sound bite being played by somebody on the radio. I wasn't paying that close attention. It wasn't in a context that would probably wind up in a news story though. Why do you care?
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:29 pm
The one source I always rely on without attempting to verify the facts is talk radio. I mean, like they couldn't say something unless it was true, right?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:33 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Why do you care?


Well, you said that if one had a problem with the number, one should take it up with Madrid.

I hardly can quote as source "Foxfyre on A2K", I suppose.
0 Replies
 
High Seas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:43 pm
The most accurate statistics on criminal illegal aliens are compiled by the GAO (General Accounting Office), not talk radio (!)

http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05646r.html

Quote:
Results:

The briefing slides in enclosure I address each of our three questions.
In summary, for our study population of 55,322 illegal aliens, we found
that:

* They were arrested at least a total of 459,614 times, averaging about
8 arrests per illegal alien. Nearly all had more than 1 arrest. Thirty-
eight percent (about 21,000) had between 2 and 5 arrests, 32 percent
(about 18,000) had between 6 and 10 arrests, and 26 percent (about
15,000) had 11 or more arrests. Most of the arrests occurred after
1990.

* They were arrested for a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses,
averaging about 13 offenses per illegal alien. One arrest incident may
include multiple offenses, a fact that explains why there are nearly
one and half times more offenses than arrests.[Footnote 6] Almost all
of these illegal aliens were arrested for more than 1 offense. Slightly
more than half of the 55,322 illegal aliens had between 2 and 10
offenses. About 45 percent of all offenses were drug or immigration
offenses. About 15 percent were property-related offenses such as
burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and property damage.
About 12 percent were for violent offenses such as murder, robbery,
assault, and sex-related crimes. The balance was for such other
offenses as traffic violations, including driving under the influence;
fraud--including forgery and counterfeiting; weapons violations; and
obstruction of justice.

* Eighty percent of all arrests occurred in three states--California,
Texas, and Arizona. Specifically, about 58 percent of all arrests
occurred in California, 14 percent in Texas, and 8 percent in Arizona.


New Mexico isn't burdened with as many criminal illegal aliens as the other 3 states, but even so Gov. Richardson declared a state of emergency in 2005:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/12/newmexico/
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:48 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
Why do you care?


Well, you said that if one had a problem with the number, one should take it up with Madrid.

I hardly can quote as source "Foxfyre on A2K", I suppose.


For all I know she had the number as wrong as you, ebrown and others think everybody else has the numbers wrong. I honestly don't care enough to look for it.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 03:58 pm
High Seas wrote:
The most accurate statistics on criminal illegal aliens are compiled by the GAO (General Accounting Office), not talk radio (!)

http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05646r.html

Quote:
Results:

The briefing slides in enclosure I address each of our three questions.
In summary, for our study population of 55,322 illegal aliens, we found
that:

* They were arrested at least a total of 459,614 times, averaging about
8 arrests per illegal alien. Nearly all had more than 1 arrest. Thirty-
eight percent (about 21,000) had between 2 and 5 arrests, 32 percent
(about 18,000) had between 6 and 10 arrests, and 26 percent (about
15,000) had 11 or more arrests. Most of the arrests occurred after
1990.

* They were arrested for a total of about 700,000 criminal offenses,
averaging about 13 offenses per illegal alien. One arrest incident may
include multiple offenses, a fact that explains why there are nearly
one and half times more offenses than arrests.[Footnote 6] Almost all
of these illegal aliens were arrested for more than 1 offense. Slightly
more than half of the 55,322 illegal aliens had between 2 and 10
offenses. About 45 percent of all offenses were drug or immigration
offenses. About 15 percent were property-related offenses such as
burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and property damage.
About 12 percent were for violent offenses such as murder, robbery,
assault, and sex-related crimes. The balance was for such other
offenses as traffic violations, including driving under the influence;
fraud--including forgery and counterfeiting; weapons violations; and
obstruction of justice.

* Eighty percent of all arrests occurred in three states--California,
Texas, and Arizona. Specifically, about 58 percent of all arrests
occurred in California, 14 percent in Texas, and 8 percent in Arizona.


New Mexico isn't burdened with as many criminal illegal aliens as the other 3 states, but even so Gov. Richardson declared a state of emergency in 2005:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/08/12/newmexico/


Yeah I posted that site earlier HS, but the problem is that it isn't a complete study but only tracks a portion of the illegals. I think. Is there more information someplace else?
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 04:03 pm
These attempts to defame illegal immigrants are almost ridiculous (if they didn't involve defaming real people).

The GAO numbers are very reliable if you don't cut and paste to leave out the important point of the study.

Quote:

To obtain information to answer these objectives, we identified a
population of 55,322 aliens that the U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) in the Department of Homeland Security determined,
based upon information in its immigration databases, had entered the
country illegally and were still illegally in the country at the time
of their incarceration in federal or state prison or local jail during
fiscal year 2003.



This was a study of 55,322 people who had been in prison!

Saying that a high percentage of immigrants who had been to prison were found to have commited a crime sounds fantasically horrific....

... but it doesn't mean very much to the general point that most illegal immigrants, particularly those who since they haven't been in prison aren't part of this particular study, are hardworking decent people who don't commit any crime worse than crossing a border.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 05:03 pm
There are some peeps who don't mind making posts/statements which further their agenda which include data that is not only questionable but absolutely wrong and then take the postion that they are only passing on information they heard somewhere and are not responsible for truth.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 07:03 pm
ebrown,
Since you dont seem to mind when our immigration laws are broken,what other laws would it be ok to break?

As long as I dont hurt anyone,can I rob a bank?
After all,its just a silly law.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 07:18 pm
old europe wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
a disproportionate percentage of the rapes, murders, drunk drivers, burglaries, drug trafficking, jail and prison populations in New Mexico and other border states involve people who are here illegally.


Yes, I've heard that claim made quite frequently. Do you have any actual numbers on that - especially about New Mexico? It's possible that this has been mentioned or posted earlier on this thread, but I hope you wouldn't mind to post these numbers again. It would help to have a more productive discussion on the topic, I think.


Okay, just checking in to see if anybody has found anything on New Mexico. Apparently not. Hm.

I found ebrown's link to be quite interesting and thought I might as well repost the data from the U.S. Department of Justice...

Code: Noncitizens held in prison Percent of all inmates
6/30/05 6/30/04

Federal 35,285 34,442 19.3%
California 16,613 17,890 10.1
Texas 9,346 9,048 6.0
New York* 7,444 8,027 11.8
Florida 4,772 4,834 5.6
Arizona 4,179 3,924 12.7
Nevada 1,402 1,242 12.6
North Carolina 1,182 868 3.2
Illinois 1,065 782 4.2
Colorado* 1,029 1,022 5.1

*Report foreign-born inmates rather than noncitizens.


There was a bit more in that report:

• State and Federal correctional authorities held 91,117 noncitizens (6.4% of all prisoners), down from 91,815 at midyear 2004.
• At midyear 2005, 61% of noncitizen prisoners held in State facilities; 39% in Federal facilities.
• California, Texas, New York, Florida, and Arizona held over 75% of all
noncitizens confined in State prisons.

However, that does neither confirm nor refute the claim Foxfyre made about New Mexico...
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 07:21 pm
dyslexia wrote:
There are some peeps who don't mind making posts/statements which further their agenda which include data that is not only questionable but absolutely wrong and then take the postion that they are only passing on information they heard somewhere and are not responsible for truth.


Astonishing how often that happens with some posters, isn't it?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 07:25 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
dyslexia wrote:
There are some peeps who don't mind making posts/statements which further their agenda which include data that is not only questionable but absolutely wrong and then take the postion that they are only passing on information they heard somewhere and are not responsible for truth.


Astonishing how often that happens with some posters, isn't it?

Cycloptichorn

Not really, FF has a history of such.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 07:33 pm
We should thank those poor folks who would prefer to stay home but cannot because of corrupt Latin governmental and economic policies (supported and encouraged by the U.S.). They come here and work (not steal) for wages that amount to gross exploitation, and this serves to keep inflation down in the U.S. and benefits the household budgets of Americans.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 08:08 pm
old europe wrote:
old europe wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
a disproportionate percentage of the rapes, murders, drunk drivers, burglaries, drug trafficking, jail and prison populations in New Mexico and other border states involve people who are here illegally.


Yes, I've heard that claim made quite frequently. Do you have any actual numbers on that - especially about New Mexico? It's possible that this has been mentioned or posted earlier on this thread, but I hope you wouldn't mind to post these numbers again. It would help to have a more productive discussion on the topic, I think.


Okay, just checking in to see if anybody has found anything on New Mexico. Apparently not. Hm.

I found ebrown's link to be quite interesting and thought I might as well repost the data from the U.S. Department of Justice...

Code: Noncitizens held in prison Percent of all inmates
6/30/05 6/30/04

Federal 35,285 34,442 19.3%
California 16,613 17,890 10.1
Texas 9,346 9,048 6.0
New York* 7,444 8,027 11.8
Florida 4,772 4,834 5.6
Arizona 4,179 3,924 12.7
Nevada 1,402 1,242 12.6
North Carolina 1,182 868 3.2
Illinois 1,065 782 4.2
Colorado* 1,029 1,022 5.1

*Report foreign-born inmates rather than noncitizens.


There was a bit more in that report:

• State and Federal correctional authorities held 91,117 noncitizens (6.4% of all prisoners), down from 91,815 at midyear 2004.
• At midyear 2005, 61% of noncitizen prisoners held in State facilities; 39% in Federal facilities.
• California, Texas, New York, Florida, and Arizona held over 75% of all
noncitizens confined in State prisons.

However, that does neither confirm nor refute the claim Foxfyre made about New Mexico...


No, it doesn't and I've conceded that there is conflicting data being put out there. For all I know Patsy Madrid was talking about Albuquerque or some other place with her comment because I just noted it in passing. And because our governor is ambivalent on this issue--professes outrage at all the drug smuggling going on but not supportive of a wall, etc.--it is unlikely that the information will be posted on a government website. My experience is what it is, but admittedly it is a very small sampling of the whole picture.

So I'm waiting to see if I should adjust my own perceptions of this issue.

Meanwhile I ran across this information on a lawsuit spearheaded by Barbara Boxer, nobody's idea of a Rightwingnut, who helped California file suit against the federal government to offset their excess costs in dealing with the illegals in their state.
http://www.gao.gov/archive/1995/he95022.pdf
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 08:13 pm
It seems to me that Foxfyre may be mistaken about what Patricia Madrid said...

Things said during a campaign about a controversial issue are usually readily available. The fact that this alleged quote is nowhere to be found is interesting.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 3 Jan, 2007 08:50 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
It seems to me that Foxfyre may be mistaken about what Patricia Madrid said...

Things said during a campaign about a controversial issue are usually readily available. The fact that this alleged quote is nowhere to be found is interesting.


This happened long after campaign. This was a radio program just this week - one of those 'sum up' review of the year things. And yes, I could easily be mistaken about the context in which she said it and the conclusion I drew from it--I wasn't hanging onto every word--but I'm pretty sure I heard her say it.

At any rate, the link you posted will have me backing off from any more assumptions on penal statistics until I have more information.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 4 Jan, 2007 02:15 am
Foxfyre mentioned this topic already some time ago:

Quote:
As the White House and Congress prepare to overhaul the nation's immigration laws, U.S. officials have concluded that they lack the technology and resources to handle the millions of applications for legal residency that could result from the changes and that several efforts to modernize computers have gone astray.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/03/AR2007010301618.html
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 08/09/2025 at 08:02:06