50
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 10:23 am
Quote:
ANALYSIS
N.M. Voters Friendlier to Migrants, Poll Says
63% Support Right ToWork in U.S.
http://i9.tinypic.com/404izac.jpg

source: Albuquerque Journal, 14.11.2006, pages D1 & D3
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 03:34 pm
The thing is, though, that in New Mexico immigration was kept way below the radar in the election and it was rarely mentioned or featured in any way. I would guess not one out of ten voters had a clue of the stance on immigration of their preferred candidate. And, I think that was intentional.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 03:42 pm
Right, as quoted:
Quote:
Albuquerque pollster Brian Sanderoff, who wasn't involved with the exit poll, said the views of New Mexico voters reflect the state's demographics and its history, with centuries-old Spanish influences.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 04:04 pm
Foxfyre wants to believe that she holds the "official American" view.

She refuses to accept the fact that the majority of Americans disagree with her on immigration.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 04:18 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Foxfyre wants to believe that she holds the "official American" view.

She refuses to accept the fact that the majority of Americans disagree with her on immigration.


So noted as ebrown's opinion however bad is his apparent ability to read what has actually been said.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 04:28 pm
You "think that was intentional".

An opposite opinion to Albuquerque pollster Brian Sanderoff, who said "the views of New Mexico voters reflect the state's demographics and its history, with centuries-old Spanish influences".
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Nov, 2006 04:31 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
You "think that was intentional".

An opposite opinion to Albuquerque pollster Brian Sanderoff, who said "the views of New Mexico voters reflect the state's demographics and its history, with centuries-old Spanish influences".


So what else was he going to say? It's all in how the questions are worded and the context in which they are asked. I don't doubt that New Mexico voters are more accommodating to illegals than are Texas voters as New Mexico is a far more blue state than Texas. That should not be interpreted, however, that all or most New Mexicans think we should just open up the borders and let everybody in who wants to come.

Also for those paying attention, there is more than a little hypocrisy and playing of politics on this issue:

Quote:
In New Mexico, Gov. Richardson has done much the same thing. He now blasts the federal government for not showing "the commitment or the leadership to deal with border issues." He is demanding that officials on the Mexican side bulldoze an abandoned town on the border that serves "as a staging area for illegal drugs and illegal aliens." But Mr. Richardson sang a different tune in late 2003, when he showed up at a rally for the "Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride" and told them, "¡Viva la raza! . . . Thank you for coming to Santa Fe. Know that New Mexico is your home. We will protect you. You have rights here." Jaime Becerril, one of the organizers of the freedom ride, told the Santa Fe New Mexican that the participants favored a new amnesty program. He called immigration "a byproduct of colonialism and capitalism."

http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007108
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2006 06:32 pm
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 09:45 am
If this isn't amnesty what is it??

By Charles Hurt
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
December 4, 2006



Congress will approve an immigration bill that will grant citizenship rights to most of the 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens in the U.S. after Democrats take control next month, predict both sides on Capitol Hill.
While Republicans have been largely splintered on the issue of immigration reform, Democrats have been fairly unified behind the principle that the illegals currently in the country should get citizenship rights without having to first leave the country.
"Years of dawdling have worsened our border security and made it harder to fix this broken system," said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Democrat who will lead the Judiciary Committee next year. "We should not let partisan politics and intolerance continue to delay and derail effective reform."
Democrats in both chambers say they will start with some form of legislation first drafted by Sens. John McCain, Arizona Republican, and Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, which was the basis for the bill that was approved earlier this year by the Senate.
"This past May, the Senate Judiciary Committee reported and then the Senate passed bipartisan versions of comprehensive immigration reform to bring people out of the shadows while strengthening our borders," Mr. Leahy said. "I look forward to building on that work next year and making progress on a bipartisan effort that improves security, supports our economy and respects the dignity of all people."
House Republicans and many outside Congress derided that bill as "amnesty" for allowing illegals to remain in the U.S. and eventually become citizens. Democrats say it's not amnesty because aliens must pay a fine and wait years before becoming citizens.
"The Senate bill is pure amnesty," said Rep. Jack Kingston, Georgia Republican. "Dress it up any way you want, it's still amnesty. It lets people pay their way out of sneaking into the country illegally."
With President Bush as an ally in the White House, he worries, Democrats will proceed next year with legislation to ultimately make citizens out of most of the illegals now in the country. And Republicans, still reeling from deep losses in the November elections, will give up the fight.
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, California Republican, said he expects an immigration-reform bill that doesn't deport illegal aliens to be the only significant legislation to come out of the new Democratic Congress and win Mr. Bush's approval.
"The only real legislation that can be expected from Congress is amnesty," he said. "If they come up with a plan and the president is behind it, it will pick up a lot of our own members."
Republicans also expressed little confidence that their leadership team is committed to blocking amnesty.
The group Americans for Better Immigration, which supports tougher immigration policies, has given Republican leaders mixed grades on the issue. But on the issue of amnesty, the grades have been much worse



http://www.washtimes.com/national/20061204-122448-1240r.htm
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 02:30 pm
I think if they pass anything close to the McCain/Kenndy bill, we'll see the current problems in no way solved and we will double them many times over in the next ten years.

I wonder how the Democrats, champions of the poor, justify letting the more affluent illegals BUY their citizenship? For that matter, how can any sensible person think a person willing to break the law to be here would be honest about how long they had been here? How can anybody reasonably think that is the way to go with this?
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 02:45 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Quote:
ANALYSIS
N.M. Voters Friendlier to Migrants, Poll Says
63% Support Right ToWork in U.S.


BY BARRY MASSEY
The Associated Press


And so, we're not visibly seeing the effects of illegal immigration as dramatically as the big cities in California and Arizona. So, for all of these reasons, the politicians aren't making it a polarizing issue," Sanderoff says.

source: Albuquerque Journal, 14.11.2006, pages D1 & D3


Walter, it's entire possible that in our stroll (Shopping Trip, if you must) through Old Town you didn't see a single Mexican, especially around the church. Hope you're not disappointed.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 03:05 pm
roger wrote:
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Quote:
ANALYSIS
N.M. Voters Friendlier to Migrants, Poll Says
63% Support Right ToWork in U.S.


BY BARRY MASSEY
The Associated Press


And so, we're not visibly seeing the effects of illegal immigration as dramatically as the big cities in California and Arizona. So, for all of these reasons, the politicians aren't making it a polarizing issue," Sanderoff says.

source: Albuquerque Journal, 14.11.2006, pages D1 & D3


Walter, it's entire possible that in our stroll (Shopping Trip, if you must) through Old Town you didn't see a single Mexican, especially around the church. Hope you're not disappointed.


Very true. Among the Hispanics in my family are naturalized citizens (or children of same) who immigrated from Mexico, one Puerto Rican, and most go back to the Spanish Conquistadors and their ancesters were grandfathered in as the Southwestern territories were admitted as states of the Union.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 05:58 pm
I was stationed in New Mexico for the better part of two years back in the late fifties, and don't remember seeing anything resembling anti-immigrant sentiments. Glad to hear it still holds true today.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 06:37 pm
The problem is not immigrants and I hope there aren't anti-immigrant sentiments anywhere. Certainly I have not witnessed any in New Mexico.

I hope there are anti-ILLEGAL-immigrant sentiments everywhere, however.

Some don't seem to be able to make a clear distinction between the two, however. It is particularly frustrating when the media doesn't make a distinction in its headlines.
0 Replies
 
LittleBitty
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 10:19 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
The problem is not immigrants and I hope there aren't anti-immigrant sentiments anywhere. Certainly I have not witnessed any in New Mexico.

I hope there are anti-ILLEGAL-immigrant sentiments everywhere, however.

Some don't seem to be able to make a clear distinction between the two, however. It is particularly frustrating when the media doesn't make a distinction in its headlines.


Quote:
You Don't Speak for Me formed when Col. Al Rodriguez became fed up watching media coverage of the mass protests of April. "Their leaders were saying it was a march for immigrant rights and a Latino/Hispanic movement," says Rodriguez. "I thought to myself, 'Hey, those are illegal aliens, not immigrants!'" Col. Rodriguez began speaking out to others saying, "I'm of Hispanic ancestry and those people are acting like they speak for me. Well, you don't speak for me!"


How much weight will be given to the views of these legal immigrants? Surely this removes any claim of racism.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 10:56 pm
LittleBitty wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
The problem is not immigrants and I hope there aren't anti-immigrant sentiments anywhere. Certainly I have not witnessed any in New Mexico.

I hope there are anti-ILLEGAL-immigrant sentiments everywhere, however.

Some don't seem to be able to make a clear distinction between the two, however. It is particularly frustrating when the media doesn't make a distinction in its headlines.


Quote:
You Don't Speak for Me formed when Col. Al Rodriguez became fed up watching media coverage of the mass protests of April. "Their leaders were saying it was a march for immigrant rights and a Latino/Hispanic movement," says Rodriguez. "I thought to myself, 'Hey, those are illegal aliens, not immigrants!'" Col. Rodriguez began speaking out to others saying, "I'm of Hispanic ancestry and those people are acting like they speak for me. Well, you don't speak for me!"


How much weight will be given to the views of these legal immigrants? Surely this removes any claim of racism.


I don't know LittleBitty. I hope, however, that all most Americans, including legal immigrants, do see themselves as Americans first and that their own ethnic or national heritage is here to blend with the whole instead of being something separate from the whole. Unfortunately, those who do not think it important to control our borders and who will be here do not give them any credit at all. Some people I think don't think immigrants see themselves as Americans at all.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 11:28 pm
Foxfyre,

I (as an American who was born and bred here) love my country at least as much as you do.

I feel strongly that immigrants who are here must be treated with compassion and understanding. I believe this because I believe that diversity and respect and understanding are the among very values that make America great.

I understand that you and I are on opposite sides of this issue. I am willing to accept that you are as American as I am even though you don't share these core values with us.

There are many Americans who support a compassionate immigration policy that includes a path to citizenship.

I hope you don't intend to claim that just because someone disagrees with you about immigration (legal or illegal), it means they don't love their country.

That just isn't so.
0 Replies
 
LittleBitty
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 11:38 pm
ebrown_p wrote:
Foxfyre,

I (as an American who was born and bred here) love my country at least as much as you do.

I feel strongly that immigrants who are here must be treated with compassion and understanding. I believe this because I believe that diversity and respect and understanding are the among very values that make America great.

I understand that you and I are on opposite sides of this issue. I am willing to accept that you are as American as I am even though you don't share these core values with us.

There are many Americans who support a compassionate immigration policy that includes a path to citizenship.

I hope you don't intend to claim that just because someone disagrees with you about immigration (legal or illegal), it means they don't love their country.

That just isn't so.


ebrown_p, I'd love to hear your views on the organization "Don't Speak for Me". I know we disagree on this subject but I'm interested in what you have to say just the same.
0 Replies
 
ebrown p
 
  1  
Reply Mon 4 Dec, 2006 11:46 pm
I respect their right to a voice. I disagree with their position.

Theirs is also a minority position-- 70% of Americans of Hispanic descent want a solution that includes a path to citizenship for people here illegally, and many American citizens of Hispanic descent want more than this (meaning a complete amnesty).

But in any population you are going to find some people with a dissenting opinion and they have as much a right to add their voice into the debate as anyone.

I am an American of exclusively Northern European descent. I want a path to citizenship for people who have have lives and friends and communities and families here now.

I assume that the voice of people like me is just as impressive, and I am pretty sure there is a lot more of us by both number and percentage.
0 Replies
 
LittleBitty
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Dec, 2006 12:05 am
ebrown_p wrote:
I respect their right to a voice. I disagree with their position.

Theirs is also a minority position-- 70% of Americans of Hispanic descent want a solution that includes a path to citizenship for people here illegally, and many American citizens of Hispanic descent want more than this (meaning a complete amnesty).

But in any population you are going to find some people with a dissenting opinion and they have as much a right to add their voice into the debate as anyone.

I am an American of exclusively Northern European descent. I want a path to citizenship for people who have have lives and friends and communities and families here now.

I assume that the voice of people like me is just as impressive, and I am pretty sure there is a lot more of us by both number and percentage.


I wonder what that percentage would be in the border states and if there is a difference based on one's proximity to the border. I'm also curious as to why this receives more attention and perhaps more compassion than other countries wishing to enter the U.S.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 08/07/2025 at 04:28:20