@parados,
parados wrote:
Quote:Survival of the fittest in Darwinism has intrinsically adjacent the notion of self preservation...the first form of property you do really have in conjunction with Identity (who you are to your own eyes)
Yes Humpty Dumpty. I realize words mean whatever you want them to mean. It doesn't make your argument rational or sound however. It only means you change meanings as you want to.
Quote:Fights for Territorial possession, a common trade[sic] among animals, are not that much different from fights between countries.
Actually, it's quite a bit different.
If we were animals I could kill you and live in your house and not have any worries other than someone stronger coming along.
As a person living under law, I have relinquished my rights to kill you just because I am stronger. I have agreed to a social contract that property is owned by you not because you are the strongest but because doing so protects my property. While you could argue that the social contract allows humans to survive, it has little to do with evolution on a macro scale.
Quote:and even in a more abstract sense fights between prevailing ideas...is always a question of territory, be it physical or intellectual ! Thus also a question of which ideals/concepts will prevail/dominate in a Darwinian sense...
There is no "Darwinian" sense when it comes to abstract ideas. Ideas don't survive based on being the most fit nor do unfit ideas die off. They just get recycled and pushed under a different guise.
Quote:Last but not least, to say that this "factual fact" as absolutely nothing to do with the specificity of US law given it is a Universal structural analysis on the very Nature of LAW itself and how it comes to be.
Except your "factual fact" is nothing more than your opinion. An opinion that has been disputed by many philosophers over the last many centuries.
Dumb away your "Humpty" you foolish ignorant ass...that won´t save you from getting kicked all the way down to your tree...
1 - Amazing that your basic perception and conception of strength is actually limited to physical strength ? Oh boy, you are a laugh !
let me just teach you that in order to kill me you need not "kill" me physically...if you as others, are more successful than I am, and in consequence of my inadaptation I am marginalized to the fringes of Society, given the right time my genes won´t survive.
LAW just
stablish the boundaries in which we are to compete, does n´t erase them...
2 - Its notorious that you don´t have a clue on how Neo-Darwinists explain
Social behaviour in terms of protecting their genes through
cooperation...do some reading fool !...( You may start with Ants or Bees...)
3 - Its obviously True that many ideas are recycled and don´t immediately disappear, just as it is also true that in the evolution of species, many design concepts were recreated time and again...this does n´t mean that species don´rt die despite of many core concepts passing on in a parallel process...you must distinguish different layers of analyse when it comes to compare
evolution of species with evolution of sensory organs...equally, Ideas can be recreated but not exactly in the same terms they were brought up in the past...guess what that´s evolution again !
Finally to say that you are no more then a ignorant moron who does n´t have a clue on almost anything, just trying to make a linear castle of concepts build on air for the sake of saving is ass in public...You have failed !
I could very easily point you a dozen links that relate Evolution to almost everything in our world, but for the purpose of lecturing you, I can just stick with
Herbert Spencer the actual "inventor" of the concept of Evolution (not Darwin)
Get lost !
