Who Would Vote For bush Again?

snood wrote:

Just to try to steer up put of the gutter - can we get a quick tally on who those stalwart true believers are, who would still 'pull the lever' for dubya?

Who's he running against?

Ticomaya wrote:

snood wrote:

Just to try to steer up put of the gutter - can we get a quick tally on who those stalwart true believers are, who would still 'pull the lever' for dubya?

Who's he running against?

See, Tico - this whole thread is a hypothetical question, submitted to sort of test the waters for the level of devotion still extant among those who voted for Bush before. It is useful for those of us who see some of the right as willfully blind syncophants, to ask if they would(and we know Bush is not able to run again) still vote for him is they could.

Now, even you can understand that, can't you? I could use smaller words...

You had to be seriously asking, because I just know that wasn't supposed to be funny...nobody's that frikkin stupid.

Just to try to steer up put of the gutter - can we get a quick tally on who those stalwart true believers are, who would still 'pull the lever' for dubya?

In this case, it doesn't matter who the opponent is; Bush is destructive to our country and the world. Anybody would be an improvement.

cicerone imposter wrote:

In this case, it doesn't matter who the opponent is; Bush is destructive to our country and the world. Anybody would be an improvement.

That's part of the problem in this country when people sell themselves to parties. All objectivity is lost.

snood wrote:

Just to try to steer up put of the gutter - can we get a quick tally on who those stalwart true believers are, who would still 'pull the lever' for dubya?

What's he running for?

woiyo wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

In this case, it doesn't matter who the opponent is; Bush is destructive to our country and the world. Anybody would be an improvement.

That's part of the problem in this country when people sell themselves to parties. All objectivity is lost.

I see no party affiliation there woiyo. Merely a rejection of bushco. Many people sincerly believe, objectively, that anything would be an improvement over bush. He brought this on himself by the words, deeds and results of his presidency.

anyone in the [/B]correct arena for christ's sake woiyo I should think that would be implied in my statement but if you want to split hairs go ahead.... too bad no one split any hairs about the f*cking useless war we went into for no good reason....

Tico..."Both times I voted for Bush it was in the context of an election where I knew whom he was running against. I don't just vote down the party line. It's a question of which of the candidates is the better choice for the position. So if you aren't going to tell me who the opponent is, I've no basis to be able to give you an answer to your hypothetical.

Are you telling me you could respond to such a question not knowing who he was running against?"

McGeeeeee....

Bush vs Micheal Moore - Bush Wins
Bush vs John McCain - McCain Wins
Bush vs Setanta - Bush Wins
Bush vs Hillary - Bush Wins
Bush vs Blair - Blair wins
Bush vs Gore - Bush Wins
Bush vs Giuliani - Giuliani wins

Nor is it a pre-requisite for brains to be a neoconservative. You just have to be a "yes" man/woman.