0
   

A first(?) thread on 2008: McCain,Giuliani & the Republicans

 
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 09:20 am
Romney was very slick last night, giving the best performance.

Here is a piece on his interesting selection of a favorite book. I guess he will get the Scientology vote.

http://www.slate.com/id/2165373?nav=tap3

It was quite interesting that he and about three others said that evolution does not exist.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 09:22 am
I know! It was a show of hands, and a bunch of hands went up, and , and I was like, whaaa...?!
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 09:54 am
I musta been watching a different telly, I saw 3 of the republican canditates raise their hands to affirm they did not believe in evolution (They have been identified as Sen. Sam Brownback, Gov. Mike Huckabee, and Rep. Tom Tancredo.)
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 11:19 am
Mea culpa, mea culpa! I was wrong about Romney.

washingtonpost.com's Politics Blog
About This Blog | Meet Chris Cillizza | RSS Feed (What's RSS?)
Evolution and the Hand of God
Fix editors Eric Pianin and Jason Manning write:


Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee was one of three GOP presidential candidates who said he doesn't believe in evolution. (AFP/Getty Images)Last night's GOP debate included some questions on hot-button issues important to social conservatives. The candidates were asked whether Congress made a mistake intervening in the Terri Schiavo case (Giuliani, Romney, and McCain each gave a version of "yes" it was a mistake) and whether they supported stem cell research (Romney hedged, McCain and Giuliani said "yes").

They were also asked for their thoughts on abortion and Roe v. Wade. Answers to the abortion questions varied, but most of the candidates leaned toward a "pro-life" position. Even Giuliani, who has supported abortion rights, said it would be "ok" if the Supreme court overturned Roe.

The responses to those questions showed a clear struggle within the party and among the candidates on how to deal with those issues in ways that do not alienate any particular bloc of voters.

But one of the strangest moments of the night came when the candidates were asked about evolution. The question was put directly to McCain, who answered with a simple "yes" before adding, "I believe in evolution. But I also believe, when I hike the Grand Canyon and see it at sunset, that the hand of God is there also."

Then all of the candidates were asked to indicate which of them DO NOT believe in evolution. Huckabee, Brownback and Tancredo each raised a hand. But that was it -- the debate moved on -- no follow up question and no chance for the candidates to qualify their answers or not.

In retrospect, it seems astounding that three candidates, 30 percent of the Republican presidential field, said flat out they do not believe in evolution, without any further queries or explanation on the subject.

What do you think? The comments section is open...
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 05:36 pm
From a blog by journalist John Ridley...

Yesterday I was at the Republican debate at the Reagan library in Simi Valley. I couldn't help but have a sense of my own blackness just on the drive up there. Fifteen years ago the city was still in turmoil after a Simi Valley jury acquitted four white cops in the beating of Rodney King. In politics, of course, image is everything. While the GOP clearly wanted to send a message to their base by invoking the memory of Reagan, I couldn't help but think about the subtext projected by the choice of the location to all people of color. And let's not forget, when Reagan launched his 1980 presidential bid he did so in Philadelphia, Mississippi. A place previously famous as the location where three Civil Rights activists were murdered in the 1960s.

I'm pretty sure I was the only one up at the library that made these connections.

And at the library...

I will say this; it is really a beautiful spot. And I will say there was not a single individual there who was not perfectly pleasant or extremely helpful to me.

But...

At the debate, among the candidates, the attendees, even among the press, I was it. I was the black guy. When you are a stone's throw from Los Angeles proper and you can count the people of color you see on four fingers, you can't help but really feel your blackness. Where's the diversity? Where's the future of the GOP? California -- and the party can't begin to integrate the perspectives of blacks and Asians and Hispanics? I was honestly shocked to see that, from the jump, the GOP seemed more interested in reflecting it's POV on the nation rather than absorbing fresh ideas. This was personified by the candidates on stage. While the Dems were able to showcase talent that looked like America, the Republicans hit us up with near carbon copies of a ROWGs gallery -- for those who don't read me regularly, that's Rich Old White Guys.

And I want to be clear about something. I'm not anti-Republican and I don't have it in for white guys. If he were in the race and the election was tomorrow, I'd probably vote for Hagel over Obama (and a Hagel Obama Unity ticket would cause me to quit my job -- such as it is -- and start stumping).

I think I was thrown a bit yesterday because I had expected to feel the same -- shockingly black -- when I attended my first Republican convention in New York in '04. But the convention was far more diverse up and down the line than what I saw yesterday. But the convention was also far larger in terms of attendees, and the diversity was chiefly among the rank and file. Yesterday was about the top tier of the party. Where's the perspective up there? And how does the GOP plan on staying relevant when by construction its leadership is out of touch with America?

That's something of a rhetorical question, as we can see the answer in play with the current administration.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-ridley/yesterday-i-was-black-guy_b_47652.html
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 06:06 pm
They just "buy" black votes; all else doesn't matter.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 06:22 pm
Advocate wrote:
washingtonpost.com's Politics Blog
About This Blog | Meet Chris Cillizza | RSS Feed (What's RSS?)
Evolution and the Hand of God

The Fix also has a list of GOP Debate: Winners and Losers. In addition to a debate wrap-up from directly after the debate.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 06:27 pm
More on the question of "Who Won the Republican Debate?": TNR collected the conclusions of ten bloggers from across the political spectrum.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 07:22 pm
nimh wrote:
More on the question of "Who Won the Republican Debate?": TNR collected the conclusions of ten bloggers from across the political spectrum.


That requires registration... any chance of copying and pasting, or just summarizing?

(Nice to see you!)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 May, 2007 08:56 pm
sozobe wrote:
nimh wrote:
More on the question of "Who Won the Republican Debate?": TNR collected the conclusions of ten bloggers from across the political spectrum.

That requires registration... any chance of copying and pasting, or just summarizing?

(Nice to see you!)


Hi! Sorry, havent been too much on A2K this week, and as far as I've done politics I've focused on the French presidential elections and, last night/today, the elections for the Scottish and Welsh parliaments and English local councils.

But here's the TNR piece (bit ho-hum, but interesting horse-race stuff anyway). The original version has links to each of the cites..:

Quote:
Conventional-Wisdom Roundup.
Who Won the Republican Debate?


Only at TNR Online | Post date 05.04.07

Last night, the ten declared Republican presidential candidates gathered at the Ronald Reagan library in Simi Valley, California for their first debate. With the Republican nomination even more wide-open than the Democratic one, it was a chance for the front-runners to shine and for those on the wings to grab a bit of the spotlight. Who won the first round? We've collected the conclusions of ten bloggers from across the political spectrum:

Andrew Sullivan, The Daily Dish: John McCain

McCain's strong criticism of a "badly mismanaged" war gave him the edge in my book. McCain was easily the strongest on spending. ... He also forthrightly supported evolution which puts him in the ranks of sane Republicans. ... I have to say I found Romney smarmy beyond even my expectations. The man will obviously say and do anything to get power or please a crowd. ... Giuliani is simply not a very impressive speaker or debater...

Erick Erickson, Redstate: John McCain/Fred Thompson

"John McCain won. Let's not dance around this. Mitt Romney shined, he stood out, he did well. Rudy Giuliani imploded. Rudy totally and utterly self-destructed tonight. He had many chances to get in good with the core base of Republican voters and ignored every moment. ... But McCain cuisine reigned supreme. He served up a dish of anger, a willingness to criticize, and a desire to fight--hard. ... But let's be honest. Who really won? Fred Thompson. None of the men on that stage really stood out tonight. Tancredo, Ron Paul, Tommy Thompson, and Jim Gilmore just made you wonder why on earth they were there."

Ann Althouse, Althouse: Mitt Romney

I thought McCain was fine. You could see he was trying very hard and seemed to have a lot of memorized lines. He had a forced tough-guy style of speaking. But I thought it was clear that Romney was the one who excelled. Was I a sucker for "smarmy"?

Roger L. Simon, Roger L. Simon: Fred Thompson

Who is winning the Republican Debate (near end)? Fred Thompson. By a lot. Much as I admire Giuliani and agree with most of his policies, this whole debate was dull dull dull. The wise man stayed out.

Joe Klein, Swampland: Mitt Romney

Here's my gimmick: I listened to the debate on radio. ... Second Impression: Mitt Romney is Reagan Reincarnate. People forget how damn smooth Reagan was, that caramel voice, that you-can't-ever-ruffle-me demeanor. Romney had that on the radio ... especially the aw-shucks ease of answer.

Mickey Kaus, Slate: John McCain/Ron Paul/Duncan Hunter

Judging just on affect, Blink-like, I thought McCain, Ron Paul, and Hunter did well. Giuliani a bit less well. Romney appears stiff and phony compared to the other front-runners. He made me want to go re-read Catcher in the Rye. Tancredo and Huckabee failed to make much of an impact at all. Brownback seemed to be talking about 50% of the time, but I can't remember a thing he said.

Kevin Drum, Political Animal: Not Mitt Romney

However, especially given my pro-Romney post of a couple of days ago, where I picked him as the likely GOP nominee, I have to say that he was the one candidate who most made me want to leave the room screaming. I guess now I understand the instinctive revulsion some people feel toward Hillary Clinton's speaking style. To me, Romney looked like the perfect Stepford candidate, pulled out of a mold somewhere and propped up on a stage where he'd stand there looking good and spouting endless pieties designed to say as little as possible and offend the fewest possible viewers. I half expected someone to come up at the end, remove his battery pack, and carry him off the stage. Brrr.

Taylor Marsh, Taylor Marsh: The Antidote To Right-Wing Talk: Ron Paul

Only one person looks and sounds like someone even remotely related to Goldwater conservatism, from which the conservative movement was born: Ron Paul. That gives you an idea of how dead the Republican Party is today, because Paul hasn't a chance. Ron Paul is the only one who acknowledged that the foreign policy that got us into Iraq is antithetical to the foreign policy history of America. The rest of the guys on this stage proved one thing: they're all a bunch of Bushies.

Ed Morrissey, Captain's Quarters: Mitt Romney

Mitt Romney won this debate. He looked relaxed, answered clearly, showed real warmth and a sense of humor, and actually answered the questions asked of him--even the stupid ones, to which I'll return shortly. After Romney, one has to think that Jim Gilmore and Mike Huckabee may have made some strides in breaking out of the third tier. They also showed that they could connect emotionally to the audience and give clear, thoughtful answers.

Paul Mirengoff, Power Line: John McCain

Frankly, I think John McCain had the best night. He seemed a bit nervous at first, but soon found his stride. He managed more ably than his chief rivals, McCain and Romney, to give answers that will appeal to a reasonably full spectrum of Republican voters without seeming to pander to anyone.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 May, 2007 01:59 pm
All the candidates, except for one, engaged in a sickening suck-up to Reagan's memory. It is too bad they can't be honest about his many failures, starting with his supply-side economics, which brought us the first of the huge deficits from a succession of Rep presidents. He was controlled by his billionaire buddies, whom he rewarded handsomely through tax and other favors. He took direction from an astrologist and his idiot wife. He participated in what was in essence a coup through his actions with respect to Nicaragua. Etc., etc.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 May, 2007 07:49 pm
from Newsmax (home of conservatives, not Republicans)

Quote:
Giuliani Gave Six Times to Planned Parenthood
Tuesday, May 8, 2007 12:28 a.m. EDT

Quote:
Presidential hopeful Rudolph Giuliani's effort to distance himself from his past support of abortion rights has taken a blow with the revelation that he contributed money to Planned Parenthood - the top provider of abortions in the United States.

According to Federal records obtained by The Politico, Giuliani and his then-wife Donna Hanover gave donations to national, state and city chapters of the organization at least six times in 1993, 1994, 1998 and 1999, with the contributions totaling $900.

"Giuliani's contributions could echo throughout the 2008 GOP nomination battle, as he seeks to lessen the political impact of his support for abortions rights - an unpopular position among social conservatives," Politico notes.

Campaigning last month in South Carolina, Giuliani declared: "I'm against abortion. I hate it. I wish there never was an abortion and I would counsel a woman to have an adoption instead of an abortion."

More recently, he said at the first Republican presidential debate that "it'd be O.K." if Roe v. Wade were overturned, although he also said he wouldn't have a problem if the Court let the decision stand.


Quote:
Asked to reconcile Giuliani's opposition to abortion with his contributions to Planned Parenthood, spokeswoman Maria Comella told Politico: "Mayor Giuliani has been consistent in his position - he is personally opposed to abortion, but at the same time he understands it is a personal and emotional decision that should ultimately be left up to the woman."

But Clemson University political science professor Dave Woodard, a Republican, said contributing money to Planned Parenthood would put Giuliani "in a very precarious position, at least in the South Carolina Republican Party.



Quote:
"An overt act of giving money shows support for a position. That can't be a mistake or misinterpretation."

In 2005, the last year for which figures are available, Planned Parenthood performed 264,943 abortions.

© NewsMax 2007. All rights reserved.


he's got the flip
he's got the flop
it's all good
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 May, 2007 09:04 pm
The online Right-wing community is turning on Guiliani hard.

Naturally, this was a predictable outcome

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 May, 2007 03:48 pm
Talking about Giuliani - this on a note of levity:

On YouTube: Animated Ferrets vs Rudy Giuliani

And then there was this comment about it on the TNR blog: Smile

Quote:
The ferret people wanted us to think

posted by williamyard on 2007-05-11 19:24:42

that the Dude was attacked with a "marmot" in the bathtub scene in "The Big Lebowski"--remember the Dude saying, "Nice marmot!"

As the movie showed, however, ferrets are, first and foremost, nonstop predators.

Now, New Yorkers are if nothing else the most creative weapons-users on the planet. Since 2003 alone, New Yorkers have killed each other using dildoes, bait, nitrous oxide, Lladro statues (three times in separate incidents, all in Queens), thongs, meat (mortadella in the Battery, a rib-eye in the Upper 80s), urine, and trash compacters.

Members of the animal kingdom thus employed include parakeets (asphyxiation), leeches (hemorrhage), bees (anaphylaxis--twice, once on Staten Island and once in the Village), green anaconda (internal hemorrhage), bullfrog (asphyxiation), and tapir, tortoise, and tuna (blows to the head--all, coincidentally, in Brooklyn).

We laugh at the Dude's jolly bathing predicament; meanwhile, those two deaths by ferret attacks in Jersey in 2002 and a third upstate last year have been hushed up to the point that one can find them only with great time and effort on LexisNexis (don't even waste your time on Google).

And now they want to legalize the damn things.

What's sad about this, of course, is that finally someone as obviously sane as Rudy Giuliani comes along, and he's greeted not with outstretched arms but with distortion, ridicule, and outright lies.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 10:40 am
I gather that a lot of Reps are looking to Fred Thompson to enter the race, and serve as a reincarnated Reagan. What is it with the Reps' love of old hambone actors?

Thompson didn't distinguish himself as a senator, and has not shown any particular propensity as a leader. Why is there this affection for him?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Sun 13 May, 2007 04:16 pm
They're longing for a knight on a white horse to save them all, and none of the current contenders look the part..
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 04:03 pm
On an odder note (still) ... here's a side to the guy you'd never suspected:

Giuliani the Masochist

Quote:
New York's fun profile of the tirelessly classy Judith Giuliani has this anecdote, in which Rudy comes across a bit like Ben Stiller trying to impress a woman at any cost:

    Before they were married, he indulged her desire to dine regularly at Le Cirque even though the heavy cuisine tended to make him queasy. "It was almost required daily, going to Le Cirque for dinner, and Rudy used to throw up afterward, because the food was so rich," says a witness. "But she wanted to go, because it was the place to be seen, and the treatment by Sirio [Maccioni, the owner] was incredible."
If you're already feeling sorry for the former mayor, don't forget that this was during the period in which he was battling prostate cancer! But hey, Le Cirque is a place to be seen.

Source
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 04:20 pm
Newt said today that he expects to make a decision on whether or not to run by September. It is probably a good strategy. While the other hopefuls have to spend their money flitting about and doing debates (another one tomorrow) and having to respond to everyday events, he can largely lay low. The sucking sound you hear is money coming out of the campaign donations to some of the other candidates.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 04:36 pm
Gingrich Says There Is a 'Great Possibility' He Will Run for President

I cant wait. It'll put the cherry on the already somewhat "out there" quality of the Republican primaries.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Mon 14 May, 2007 04:37 pm
Oh sorry, hadnt seen rjb's post there.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

My Fellow Prisoners... - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Afred E. Smith Dinner - Discussion by cjhsa
mccain begs off - Discussion by dyslexia
If Biden And Obama Aren't Qualified - Discussion by Bi-Polar Bear
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
McCain lies - Discussion by nimh
The Case Against John McCain - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/16/2025 at 06:26:35