Anon-Voter wrote:Dys,
Actually, CJ had to move back in with Mom ... he needed her to help change since he developed that irritating little incontinence problem !!
Anon
Thanks for keeping me on the current page.
Loser.
I hear it snowed in hell yesterday.
Not really!
However it did snow on the low summit from SF to Sausalito on 101 last night, prompting a 28 car pileup. Had 101 North shut down from 2:30AM to around 2:00PM. Sat afternoon. Does that count??
Sorry to hear about your incontenance problem there CJ ... I hope Mom can help with that diaper rash!! It seems to be making you cranky
Anon
Too bad you weren't taking a road trip.
Nah, I just take my helicopter.
Anon
Cool. Watching rotors is like watching NASCAR.
Okay kiddies, grab your pistols.
An air gun without the bb's.
cicerone imposter wrote:Okay kiddies, grab your pistols.
Hey CI, Did you hear about our monster smack-up on 101 North ??
Anon
Yeah, my wife told me about it. I rarely watch t.v., and she said over 30 cars were involved.
Anon-Voter wrote:[Do you visit Rome often? We should be there by July.
No ... and it's too far for a day-trip
Regarding the comments made about how odd it is to be so concerned about the Dubai company when other ports and other transportation avenues(correct phrasing?) are owned by foreign companies.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060309/ap_on_go_co/airlines_foreign_owners
So, globalization and capitalism is good, and every country should embrace it, unless those pesky foreigners want to invest in the States... Then it becomes an issue of "security, safety and national defense obligations".
I see.
That's what I was trying to explain here since ages ... :wink:
Damn isolationist racist pig Democrats anyway.
old europe wrote:So, globalization and capitalism is good, and every country should embrace it, unless those pesky foreigners want to invest in the States... Then it becomes an issue of "security, safety and national defense obligations".
I see.
Foreign investment in the States is well and good, but scrutiny is warranted when the investment causes the foreign investor to be an integral part of the domestic
infrastructure which raises national security concerns.
cjhsa wrote:Damn isolationist racist pig Democrats anyway.
You forgot "fear-mongering."
Ticomaya wrote:
Foreign investment in the States is well and good, but scrutiny is warranted when the investment causes the foreign investor to be an integral part of the domestic infrastructure which raises national security concerns.
But that an Dubai company is concerned with the security of the US Navy since more than 10 years doesn't raise national security concerns?
Ticomaya wrote:cjhsa wrote:Damn isolationist racist pig Democrats anyway.
You forgot "fear-mongering."
I thought the Republicans still have a majority in each and every chamber?
(Doesn't matter. Bash the Democrats anyway.)
(Not that you need encouragement.)
Walter Hinteler wrote:Ticomaya wrote:
Foreign investment in the States is well and good, but scrutiny is warranted when the investment causes the foreign investor to be an integral part of the domestic infrastructure which raises national security concerns.
But that an Dubai company is concerned with the security of the US Navy since more than 10 years doesn't raise national security concerns?
Says you ... repeatedly ... despite all the blogs to the contrary.
