3
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

 
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:24 am
Kum ba yah ...
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:27 am
Lash wrote:
We have a clean slate. Looking forward to seeing what develops.

Spoke too soon. Back to the Democrat thread... Very Happy
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:30 am
Have y'all been arguing? Here, let me get my paddle.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:34 am
Bernie's being good, Lola ... but please paddle him anyway. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:39 am
I will.....but for the naughty ones, after I finish with Bernie for his goodness, get in line. This paddle is hot!
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:53 am
Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
By all means. No sense suffering the anxiety of cognitive dissonance, tico. Keep that little noggin happy.


Nonsense, blatham. We've covered this ground before.

You've been asked nicely, but you choose to be obtrusive.


Wow! Does that mean you've been arguing about this since page 283 of Thread I?
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:55 am
Anyway, Tico,,,,,Bernie? Being good? sure....
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:58 am
Lola wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
By all means. No sense suffering the anxiety of cognitive dissonance, tico. Keep that little noggin happy.


Nonsense, blatham. We've covered this ground before.

You've been asked nicely, but you choose to be obtrusive.


Wow! Does that mean you've been arguing about this since page 283 of Thread I?


Intermittently. You weren't aware of his stubborn side? Shocked
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 10:58 am
Lola wrote:
Anyway, Tico,,,,,Bernie? Being good? sure....


Relatively speaking, of course.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 11:11 am
Ticomaya wrote:
Lola wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
blatham wrote:
By all means. No sense suffering the anxiety of cognitive dissonance, tico. Keep that little noggin happy.


Nonsense, blatham. We've covered this ground before.

You've been asked nicely, but you choose to be obtrusive.


Wow! Does that mean you've been arguing about this since page 283 of Thread I?


Intermittently. You weren't aware of his stubborn side? Shocked
Laughing Hilarious But you all stop this fighting and get on with talking about the aftermath.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:05 pm
You guys are right. You need a thread where you can celebrate the successes of the Bush Administration without being invaded by us. I will leave you to your celebration. I will not post again in your thread.

Anon
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:06 pm
I know it's President's Day, but it's starting to feel like Christmas.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:14 pm
Now, I'm almost ready to break out in Kumbaya.

<hits self hard in stomach>
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:15 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
I know it's President's Day, but it's starting to feel like Christmas.


You're welcome Tico! I suggest everyone else respect your privacy as well!

Anon
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:42 pm
Hey, I'm missing some ecstasy. Anon....
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:48 pm
Back to that port problem that cropped up last week. Those five ports are currently owned by the British who now presume to sell them to the Arab group who are listed as our allies.

How can we best dodge this bullet without being accused of racism and all sorts of other uglies?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:34 pm
I didn't follow this closely, but hasn't the purchase of the UK ports and ferries operator been approved by both its shareholders and by all the relevant regulatory authorities?

Or are you talking about something else than P&O ?

(No global business as usual?)
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:43 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
Back to that port problem that cropped up last week. Those five ports are currently owned by the British who now presume to sell them to the Arab group who are listed as our allies.

How can we best dodge this bullet without being accused of racism and all sorts of other uglies?


Right on.

So, what do we know about the Emirates? The CIA World Factbook has this to say about the UAE:

Quote:
Background:

The Trucial States of the Persian Gulf coast granted the UK control of their defense and foreign affairs in 19th century treaties. In 1971, six of these states - Abu Zaby, 'Ajman, Al Fujayrah, Ash Shariqah, Dubayy, and Umm al Qaywayn - merged to form the United Arab Emirates (UAE). They were joined in 1972 by Ra's al Khaymah. The UAE's per capita GDP is on par with those of leading West European nations. Its generosity with oil revenues and its moderate foreign policy stance have allowed the UAE to play a vital role in the affairs of the region.


and, about the economy:

Quote:
The UAE has an open economy with a high per capita income and a sizable annual trade surplus. Its wealth is based on oil and gas output (about 30% of GDP), and the fortunes of the economy fluctuate with the prices of those commodities. Since the discovery of oil in the UAE more than 30 years ago, the UAE has undergone a profound transformation from an impoverished region of small desert principalities to a modern state with a high standard of living. At present levels of production, oil and gas reserves should last for more than 100 years. The government has increased spending on job creation and infrastructure expansion and is opening up its utilities to greater private sector involvement. Higher oil revenue, strong liquidity, and cheap credit in 2005 led to a surge in asset prices (shares and real estate) and consumer inflation. Any sharp correction to the UAE's equity markets could damage investor and consumer sentiment and affect bank asset quality. In April 2004, the UAE signed a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) with Washington and in November 2004 agreed to undertake negotiations toward a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the US.



I find the last sentence very interesting. So the USA and the UAE have signed a TIFA are negotiating a Free Trade Agreement. I suppose that would allow American companies to invest in the UAE. Furthermore, in 2004, the USA were the UAE's seventh most-important imports-partner, accounting for 6 percent of the imports or US$ 3.6 billion.

<hoping the post was on-topic enough not to be considered spam>
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:45 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I didn't follow this closely, but hasn't the purchase of the UK ports and ferries operator been approved by both its shareholders and by all the relevant regulatory authorities?

Or are you talking about something else than P&O ?

(No global business as usual?)



Well... yes, I thought Foxy was talking about the P&O takeover...

Or did I miss something??
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:46 pm
old europe wrote:

<hoping the post was on-topic enough not to be considered spam>


Oops Embarrassed sorry. Didn't notice that (my only weak excuse: I wasn't online for a week).

My question was thought to be serious, but you certainly can disregard it.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/14/2025 at 06:18:22