Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

ok, Laura got upset with her boyfriend and offed him at an intersection.

Ted was drunk, drove off a bridge, and probably forgot there was a passenger in the car!

Can we please stop the stupid argument cause nobody from the forum was even there!

anon,
My "right wing proof" as you call it is neither rightwing or proof.
It is simply a site that has posted the police report,along with the photo's of the accident scene.

Are you saying that the police that investigated are "right wing" also?

Anon, if its any consolation, me and a few other people here at the forum read your postings at the seattle site.

Nothing i saw or read could be construed as 'lieing' or whatever some moderators thought. Who cares.

Stradee wrote:

Anon, if its any consolation, me and a few other people here at the forum read your postings at the seattle site.

Nothing i saw or read could be construed as 'lieing' or whatever some moderators thought. Who cares.

I never claimed he lied about what he said.
I wanted to know if he still laughs when American soldiers die,or if he still thinks its funny that Pat Tillman was killed.

As you can see,he still does.
At least he finally admitted it.That was all I wanted to know.

I do find it interesting however,that he finally admits to saying it,after he finds out that EVERYONE will be able to see that he wrote it and that I was telling the truth about what he said.

February 10, 2006, 9:18 a.m.
One Sorry Mess of a Party
The Democrats' downward spiral.

6th sense, you hang around the rap threads and you're a Republican?

I had no idea such creatures existed.

Strange. Paul Pillar presents a very different view in his book. I think the writer of the piece may be representing either his words or his intentions.



Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy
In this critical study, Paul R. Pillar insists that we still have more to fear from conventional methods of terror like hijackings than from exotic forms like biological and chemical strikes. In addition, Pillar, a career CIA officer, identifies the necessary elements of counterterrorist policy, examines why the United States is a prime terrorist target, and reveals why the counterterrorist policies that seem strongest are not always the most effective.

Foxfyre wrote:

Strange. Paul Pillar presents a very different view in his book. I think the writer of the piece may be representing either his words or his intentions.



Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy
In this critical study, Paul R. Pillar insists that we still have more to fear from conventional methods of terror like hijackings than from exotic forms like biological and chemical strikes. In addition, Pillar, a career CIA officer, identifies the necessary elements of counterterrorist policy, examines why the United States is a prime terrorist target, and reveals why the counterterrorist policies that seem strongest are not always the most effective.

Interesting site you've linked into there, fox.