Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

Anon-Voter wrote:

mysteryman wrote:
anon,
I see you ran crying and got my truth about you deleted.

Thats fine,but remember this next time you dare to say anything hypocritical.
What you wrote is posted,and I will continue to link it to EVERYThing I post.
You are to much of a coward to admit what you said,but we all know you said it.

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=37997&start=6930

I didn't get anything deleted. Your lies just don't cut it around here!! When you're a congenital liar, you a congenital liar. Apparently I'm not the only one that knows it!!

Anon

I quoted you word for word.
If the powers that be here will let me,I will post a link right to the exact page on the other site where you said it,along with bringing other witnesses.
I am ready to prove my case.
Why dont you prove I am lying about what you wrote...IF YOU CAN

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=37997&start=6930

0 Replies

Lash wrote:

Foxfyre wrote:
I'm sure Salon.com didn't carry that information.

Best damn laugh in two days!!

<an example>

Sorry Blatham, but that was pretty damn funny... Laughing

I respect your stamina, but you'd do yourself a favor to stop short of defending fools (to put it in the nicest possible term) like Kennedy.

MM, do me a favor and PM me that link so I can verify it for myself. No offense, but it's too offensive of a post to not verify. Though I can't say I'm terribly surprised. Rolling Eyes

0 Replies

OCCOM BILL wrote:

Lash wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
I'm sure Salon.com didn't carry that information.

Best damn laugh in two days!!

<an example>

Sorry Blatham, but that was pretty damn funny... I respect your stamina, but you'd do yourself a favor to stop short of defending fools (to put it in the nicest possible term) like Kennedy.

MM, do me a favor and PM me that link so I can verify it for myself. No offense, but it's too offensive of a post to not verify. Though I can't say I'm terribly surprised.

You can count on him not including it all!! Ya know what OCCOM, in your case, it doesn't make much difference. I don't care what PNAC fascists think. I saw your great post where you think we should pull another Iraq style PNAC action in Africa. You're just another venal fascist!! You definitely belong in the same company as MM!!

Anon

0 Replies

mysteryman wrote:

Anon-Voter wrote:
mysteryman wrote:
anon,
I see you ran crying and got my truth about you deleted.

Thats fine,but remember this next time you dare to say anything hypocritical.
What you wrote is posted,and I will continue to link it to EVERYThing I post.
You are to much of a coward to admit what you said,but we all know you said it.

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=37997&start=6930

I didn't get anything deleted. Your lies just don't cut it around here!! When you're a congenital liar, you a congenital liar. Apparently I'm not the only one that knows it!!

Anon

I quoted you word for word.
If the powers that be here will let me,I will post a link right to the exact page on the other site where you said it,along with bringing other witnesses.
I am ready to prove my case.
Why dont you prove I am lying about what you wrote...IF YOU CAN

http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=37997&start=6930

You keep quoting the locked thread ... not where I answered you!! You gotta a reason for that?? Bloody liar!!

You definitely are a child of Bush!!

Anon

0 Replies

fox and tico...thanks for the links/info

OCCOM BILL wrote:

Lash wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
I'm sure Salon.com didn't carry that information.

Best damn laugh in two days!!

<an example>

Sorry Blatham, but that was pretty damn funny... I respect your stamina, but you'd do yourself a favor to stop short of defending fools (to put it in the nicest possible term) like Kennedy.

MM, do me a favor and PM me that link so I can verify it for myself. No offense, but it's too offensive of a post to not verify. Though I can't say I'm terribly surprised.

Don't at all mind a good joke at my expense, but fox's thing was completely predictable. At Christmas, a buddy of one of my nephews nailed me with something so bright and unexpected that I was rendered utterly speechless for a good ten seconds.

I appreciate that a lot of you folks on the right really dislike Kennedy. I guess it is his rich-kid upbringing in the rooty-tooty Washington/east coast environment and his Ivy League creds but as Dubya is the same, it's all a bit confusing to me. In any case, I didn't defend him. I said that his (or anyone else's) questioning of Alito for membership in CAP and the subsequent boasting of it was completely valid for a SC nominee. And of course it was. You can hold Kennedy guilty of hypocrisy (though there appears to be no racist component to his group whereas with CAP that was a clear element) and that's valid too. But it doesn't have relevance to the Alito issue except as a PR tact to divert attention.

0 Replies

I don't mind Kennedy's portfolio.

I just mind Chappaquiddik (sp)--not so much that it happened, but his rich boy/ dad takes care of these things / hey she'll have to drown to save my ass reponse, and his over the top persona of the past five or six years.

0 Replies

Lash wrote:

I don't mind Kennedy's portfolio.

I just mind Chappaquiddik (sp)--not so much that it happened, but his rich boy/ dad takes care of these things / hey she'll have to drown to save my ass reponse, and his over the top persona of the past five or six years.

Yup. That incident represents just about everything I despise regarding the unique advantages of the very wealthy, particularly when politically connected.

0 Replies

As I walked out in the streets of Laredo, as I walked out in Laredo one day.

I spied a young cowboy dressed in white linen. Dressed in white linen and cold as the clay.

I can see by your outfit that you are a cowboy. You can see by my outfit I'm a cowboy, too.

You can see by our outfits that we are both cowboys. Get yourself an outfit and be a cowboy, too!

0 Replies

Goll dang it. I'd feel plum priviledge to be yer sidekick, LimpAlong.

0 Replies

In reading up on the Concerned Alumni of Princeton, its basis was not wanting Princeton to go coed and, rather than opposing minorities, it objected to affirmative action that lowered standards for admission of minorities.

Both of these initiatives can of course be debated as to right or wrong, but to extrapolate them into being anti-female or anti-minority I think is a stretch.

Likewise I have no problem whatsoever with Kennedy belonging to an all male club as I have no problem with all male or all female social organizations. But to avail himself with one and even lie about his current membership while excoriating a Supreme Court nominee for an affiliation decades ago is hypocritical

I do have a huge problem with what Kennedy did in the MJK case, and his hypocrisy over this club thing and in various other issues such as his condemnation of Republican tax policy and demands for elimination of tax shelters on the basis that they are immoral and favor the rich. The rich must be required to pay their fair share he says. Meanwhile, he and his family shelter millions in various tax free vehicles that he doesn't want meddled with and they shelter much of their income in other places like Fiji.

On racial justice he slams the GOP or whatever Republican is president while his own business dealings are somewhat questionable on that score. He demands environmental cleanup while blocking any such initiatives on his Cape Cod properties. And he advocates alternate energy but moved to block putting up a wind farm on Nantucket where it could be seen from his property.

None of this is illegal and some of it is even legitimate. But where Kennedy is concerned, it has always been "do as I say and not do as I do" and he does not mind stretching the truth a great deal in the process.

And this is why I don't like Kennedy.

0 Replies

Apparently, there has just been another incident at the Blaine border crossing (the main crossing between Vancouver and Seattle) where Canadian border agents abandoned their posts at an alert that armed and dangerous Americans were fast approaching. That's the third such incident in the last month.

Now, this raises several interesting issues.

First, should we replace our present border staff with hockey players?

Second, do we take advantage of our growing Chinese population to help with expertise on construction of a barrier to keep the barbarians out?

Third, do we form up a Arizona/Texas style vigillante group and buy them all Ford Broncos and T-shirts ("NothingFlatMen")

0 Replies

blatham wrote:

Lash wrote:
I don't mind Kennedy's portfolio.

I just mind Chappaquiddik (sp)--not so much that it happened, but his rich boy/ dad takes care of these things / hey she'll have to drown to save my ass reponse, and his over the top persona of the past five or six years.

Yup. That incident represents just about everything I despise regarding the unique advantages of the very wealthy, particularly when politically connected.

He might have saved her, or been forthcoming with the truth, thus dispelling the inhuman nature of his actions, and leaving me with little more than recent rhetorical theatrics to despise him for.

0 Replies

Again, attorneys advising their clients to keep quite is par for the course. It was reprehensible but dragging it up everytime someone wants to disagree with Ted's tactics do not dispel his arguments. That is an attorney's trick. If one wants to be associated with the riff-raff of humanity in Washington, this is a good start.

0 Replies

It was glaring evidence of his character--the lengths he would go to save his hide.

Saving her would have, at worst, given his wife a good case to clean his clock in a divorce. The reckless vehicular homicide--or whatever the charge would have been there, would have been easy to buy off. So, he let that girl drown for money.

0 Replies

Lash wrote:

It was glaring evidence of his character--the lengths he would go to save his hide.

Saving her would have, at worst, given his wife a good case to clean his clock in a divorce. The reckless vehicular homicide--or whatever the charge would have been there, would have been easy to buy off. So, he let that girl drown for money.

How long does it take to drown Lash?

Anon

0 Replies

There was a farmhouse visible from the place where the car went off the road and the people were home. I can't remember if any other cars went by that could have been flagged down. But the reports are clear that there was a bubble of air available to Mary Jo for some time after the car submerged, and had Kennedy not left the scene of the accident but had summoned help, it is very possible that Mary Jo could have been saved.

0 Replies

I imagine that Ted was drunk. I also don't really give a ratsass. The rich, be they Bush or Kennedy, don't live by the same laws the rest of us do.

0 Replies

Foxfyre wrote:

There was a farmhouse visible from the place where the car went off the road and the people were home. I can't remember if any other cars went by that could have been flagged down. But the reports are clear that there was a bubble of air available to Mary Jo for some time after the car submerged, and had Kennedy not left the scene of the accident but had summoned help, it is very possible that Mary Jo could have been saved.

Got a link about that "bubble of air"

Anon

0 Replies

Lightwizard wrote:

Again, attorneys advising their clients to keep quite is par for the course. It was reprehensible but dragging it up everytime someone wants to disagree with Ted's tactics do not dispel his arguments. That is an attorney's trick. If one wants to be associated with the riff-raff of humanity in Washington, this is a good start.

Not attorney advised Teddy to let Mary Jo drown. That was of his own accord, and is a good reason he is part of the "riff-raff of humanity in Washington."

0 Replies

Being part of the"riff-raff of humanity in Washington." puts him on the shoulders of Bush/Cheney.

0 Replies

Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know