3
   

Bush supporters' aftermath thread II

 
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 08:36 am
xingu wrote:
What a pathetic man.

Quote:
<snip>


Why are you posting that on this thread?

Why don't you start you own thread called, "Bush ... What a Pathetic Man"? I'm sure you'd have lots of friends join you there.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 10:54 am
Ticomaya wrote:
xingu wrote:
What a pathetic man.

Quote:
<snip>


Why are you posting that on this thread?

Why don't you start you own thread called, "Bush ... What a Pathetic Man"? I'm sure you'd have lots of friends join you there.


Why don't you get off this whining little crusade of yours? Do we not seen you on every thread possible? Such a hypocrite!

[not that's there's anything wrong with you attending any ole thread you want]

If it ain't obvious to you, Tico, then you're even more of a lost cause than many think. This pathetic nature has caused virtually all of the aftermath, which sure as hell hasn't been pretty.

Everything that this crew has been involved in has been one monumental failure after another. What better place to discuss the aftermath and the causes for it.

Xingu has hit on one very important cause. Way too small a man for too big a job.

What is truly pathetic is your blind devotion to the lies, the dishonesty, the dismal lack of success of any of the campaign promises.

Delusion run rampant!
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 10:55 am
Ticomaya wrote:
xingu wrote:
What a pathetic man.

Quote:
<snip>


Why are you posting that on this thread?

Why don't you start you own thread called, "Bush ... What a Pathetic Man"? I'm sure you'd have lots of friends join you there.


I wanted to share it with you Tico. I know how much you appreciate good english and sharp intelligence.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 11:32 am
Foxfyre wrote:
blatham wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Baker doesn't seem to be advocating a better way to win. He seems to be advocating a face-saving way of getting out.


Cut and run? I highly doubt that.


Live by simpleton slogans. Die by simpleton slogans.


Said the pot to the kettle.


Do you understand the term "slogan"?

"Cut and run" is a slogan. "Stay the course" is a slogan. They are both, in this case, products of the RNC public relations operations.

Do you suppose you might provide even a single instance where I've used such a PR slogan?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 11:43 am
blatham wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
blatham wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Baker doesn't seem to be advocating a better way to win. He seems to be advocating a face-saving way of getting out.


Cut and run? I highly doubt that.


Live by simpleton slogans. Die by simpleton slogans.


Said the pot to the kettle.


Do you understand the term "slogan"?

"Cut and run" is a slogan. "Stay the course" is a slogan. They are both, in this case, products of the RNC public relations operations.

Do you suppose you might provide even a single instance where I've used such a PR slogan?


No, but I see no difference between those utilized by a political party to make a point and those you make up to make a point.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 11:52 am
Quote:


http://atrios.blogspot.com/2006_10_08_atrios_archive.html#116043519597290227

Tucker to Evangelicals: Chumps


Here's what Tucker Carlson had to say on this weekend's Chris Matthews Show:


CARLSON: It goes deeper than that though. The deep truth is that the elites in the Republican Party have pure contempt for the evangelicals who put their party in power. Everybody in...

MATTHEWS: How do you know that? How do you know that?

CARLSON: Because I know them. Because I grew up with them. Because I live with them. They live on my street. Because I live in Washington, and I know that everybody in our world has contempt for the evangelicals. And the evangelicals know that, and they're beginning to learn that their own leaders sort of look askance at them and don't share their values.

MATTHEWS: So this gay marriage issue and other issues related to the gay lifestyle are simply tools to get elected?

CARLSON: That's exactly right. It's pandering to the base in the most cynical way, and the base is beginning to figure it out.



How come the local yokels haven't figured out how badly they've been played?

How come that PoS Tucker wasn't honest enough to say this years ago? Talk about major league pandering.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 05:30 pm
Foxfyre wrote:
blatham wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
blatham wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Baker doesn't seem to be advocating a better way to win. He seems to be advocating a face-saving way of getting out.


Cut and run? I highly doubt that.


Live by simpleton slogans. Die by simpleton slogans.


Said the pot to the kettle.


Do you understand the term "slogan"?

"Cut and run" is a slogan. "Stay the course" is a slogan. They are both, in this case, products of the RNC public relations operations.

Do you suppose you might provide even a single instance where I've used such a PR slogan?


No, but I see no difference between those utilized by a political party to make a point and those you make up to make a point.


If you do not, then you misunderstand/misuse the term.

And, though it would be less than a surprise, your valuation of independance of mind (thinking for yourself rather than letting others' simplistic cliches do the task for you) is a tad unambitious.

Quote:
slogan
1. a distinctive cry, phrase, or motto of any party, group, manufacturer, or person; catchword or catch phrase.
2. a war cry or gathering cry, as formerly used among the Scottish clans.
from dictionary.com
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 05:42 pm
remember the maine.
Loose lips sink ships.
A friend in need is a pest.
don't count your bridges til you burn your chickens.
all god's chillun got shoes.
jesus is love.

All words of wisdom no doubt.
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 05:53 pm
Why do the libs insist on showing up here? They cannot help themselves. Like Clinton, it's always about them.

They are all still pissed that Bill's little oral office tryst became public knowledge that they insist on bashing the right at every opportunity, even false ones.

Too bad soldiers aren't really allowed to talk about the war with the media. From what I've heard first and secondhand, the media distortion is out of control.

Hillary and Bill - Do Not Resuscitate.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 07:22 pm
blatham wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
blatham wrote:
Foxfyre wrote:
blatham wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Baker doesn't seem to be advocating a better way to win. He seems to be advocating a face-saving way of getting out.


Cut and run? I highly doubt that.


Live by simpleton slogans. Die by simpleton slogans.


Said the pot to the kettle.


Do you understand the term "slogan"?

"Cut and run" is a slogan. "Stay the course" is a slogan. They are both, in this case, products of the RNC public relations operations.

Do you suppose you might provide even a single instance where I've used such a PR slogan?


No, but I see no difference between those utilized by a political party to make a point and those you make up to make a point.


If you do not, then you misunderstand/misuse the term.

And, though it would be less than a surprise, your valuation of independance of mind (thinking for yourself rather than letting others' simplistic cliches do the task for you) is a tad unambitious.

Quote:
slogan
1. a distinctive cry, phrase, or motto of any party, group, manufacturer, or person; catchword or catch phrase.
2. a war cry or gathering cry, as formerly used among the Scottish clans.
from dictionary.com


Oh I see. Well I'll admit a well-placed and accurate cliche is rather appealing and saves a lot of words when the alternative is the self-proclaimed far superior expoundings of self-important critics.

I'd still rather be cliched than a popinjay. Smile
0 Replies
 
SierraSong
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Oct, 2006 08:43 pm
blatham wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Baker doesn't seem to be advocating a better way to win. He seems to be advocating a face-saving way of getting out.


Cut and run? I highly doubt that.


Live by simpleton slogans. Die by simpleton slogans.


Right.

Baker told Texas Monthly Magazine recently ...

Quote:
"...the worst thing in the world we could do would be to pick up our marbles and go home,"


Like that better?
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Oct, 2006 01:22 pm
SierraSong wrote:
blatham wrote:
SierraSong wrote:
Thomas wrote:
Baker doesn't seem to be advocating a better way to win. He seems to be advocating a face-saving way of getting out.


Cut and run? I highly doubt that.


Live by simpleton slogans. Die by simpleton slogans.


Right.

Baker told Texas Monthly Magazine recently ...

Quote:
"...the worst thing in the world we could do would be to pick up our marbles and go home,"


Like that better?


Baker's statement in the Times piece mentioned earlier...
Quote:


So, no, your new simplistic cliche is no improvement.
0 Replies
 
pachelbel
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Oct, 2006 09:25 pm
Iraq for sale?
Robert Greenwald's latest film, "Iraq for Sale: The War Profiteers," has just been released, triggering a mix of praise, outrage and grave concern among concerned Americans across all political and cultural boundaries.


"Iraq for Sale" is a tale of unspeakable greed and fraud, misery and betrayal, and brazen waste of public tax dollars for private enrichment. The film reveals in compelling detail the depth of control corporate war profiteers exert over our elected representatives and the danger these alliances have created for soldiers and innocent civilians.

This is a story you won't hear or read in America's mainstream, corporate-sponsored media.

"Iraq for Sale" . . .

Contains interviews with soldiers, former private contractor workers, widows and children whose lives have been devastated as a result of profiteering in the reconstruction of Iraq.


Exposes the price gouging and exorbitant compensation levels of not just Halliburton and its subsidiary, KBR, but also companies like CACI International and Blackwater Security Consulting.


Reveals the longtime personal connections between executives of these corporations and members of the current administration.


Details the stories of truck drivers promised they would be kept out of harm's way, only to be forced to drive into battle zones unprotected.


Takes viewers inside the story of Halliburton's contract for millions of dollars to purify water -- and how our troops still do not have clean water for things as basic as brushing their teeth or making coffee.
In the true spirit of grassroots support, "Iraq for Sale" was funded entirely outside corporate America. More than 3,000 people donated $367,892 to help Greenwald and Brave New Films produce and distribute this documentary.

"Iraq for Sale" is available now on DVD for only $12.95.

This is a film every American should see.

Sincerely,

Craig Brown
for CommonDreams.org
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 06:28 am
Hmmm. Where does one find the greatest collection of anti-American news distortion, rants, screeds, and dishonesty? Salon? Daily Kos? Or Common Dreams? It is a puzzlement. That arises out of my personal perception of course.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 08:13 am
Foxfyre wrote:
Hmmm. Where does one find the greatest collection of anti-American news distortion, rants, screeds, and dishonesty?


I dunno, but unfortunately it seems you can find a lot of it right here on this thread.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 08:22 am
Ticomaya wrote:
I dunno, but unfortunately it seems you can find a lot of it right here on this thread.

<yawn>
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 08:40 am
Thomas wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
I dunno, but unfortunately it seems you can find a lot of it right here on this thread.

<yawn>


Is it past your bed time, Thomas?
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 10:20 am
They've played you wingnuts like a fiddle, Tico. And still you stroke one another's fragile egos, none of you able to face up to the truth.

Read or watch it all, Tico. I hope your old religious underwear can handle it. Better change to a Depends.

Quote:


Video and full transcript available at,

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/10/11/olbermann-exclusive-dissecting-new-book-tempting-faith/#more-10956
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 03:23 pm
Well, they gave one to Arafat, so why not?

CINDY SHEEHAN SAYS SHE'S A FINALIST FOR THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE
SOURCE
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 12 Oct, 2006 04:16 pm
Perhaps in that beautiful future, there will be a Wolfowitz Warmaker Prize. I'll nominate you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/09/2025 at 12:34:12