0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, TENTH THREAD.

 
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 12:51 pm
dunno about the iraqis, i'm not there. doesn't sound too hip to me...

but i do know that the iraq expedition (or is it experiment) and it's cic have certainly started a civil war in our country... Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 12:58 pm
Quote:
Perhaps it can be rationally argued that according to existing definitions that hating Bush is not insane and not a psychosis.


Yathink?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:04 pm
Setanta wrote:
I don't care what efforts you do or don't make. Your idiotic and baseless arguments speak for themselves. It is unfortunate, however, that casual readers who come here considering this to be a reliable source might be taken in by your willfully deceptive screeds.


Maybe you should start a petition drive. But I don't see anybody else following your strict standards on any regular basis.

And since when are you all concerned about others at this site? I've been under the impression that your primary goal was to denigrate and demean everyone else.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:09 pm
Tico wrote:
I've been under the impression that your primary goal was to denigrate and demean everyone else.


He evidently doesn't read his own stuff.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:09 pm
Whereas your primary goal is...? To act like a condescending jerk as much as possible, while avoiding the substance of your opponent's argument?

As much as I disagree with Ican at least he has the decency to actually respond to his opponent's points, rather then just denigrate their entire argument, provide no evidence why it is incorrect, and smugly restate the validity of one's own argument. You do this continually.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:11 pm
It would appear that Tico would likely fare not better in a popularity contest than would i . . . i must learn to keep better company . . .
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:14 pm
Don't sell your self short Setanta, you have plenty of sychophants here.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:18 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Whereas your primary goal is...? To act like a condescending jerk as much as possible, while avoiding the substance of your opponent's argument?

As much as I disagree with Ican at least he has the decency to actually respond to his opponent's points, rather then just denigrate their entire argument, provide no evidence why it is incorrect, and smugly restate the validity of one's own argument. You do this continually.

Cycloptichorn


What you don't like about my posts, Cyclops, is that I am often highly critical of your posts. I may be condescending (actually, no "may" about it, I often AM condescending), but I do not personally denigrate you, or call your thinking "witless," "clueless," or "brainless," nor do I call your posts "horsey-poop," or call you "stupid" or your brain "calcified."

I call you a "peacenik," and a "leftist," and believe you have a "Euroweenie" mentality, but those are all just terms of endearment.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:21 pm
What is it that causes a war to end?

Either one side defeats the other, or both sides declare an armistice and stop fighting.

I bet the war, civil or gorilla, in Iraq between Terrorist Malignancy and the Iraq government will end when one side defeats the other.

I bet the Iraq government will defeat the Terrorist Malignancy.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:26 pm
I suggest that as gorillas are not native to Iraq, and there doubtless never were sufficent gorillas in zoological gardens there to make a significant population, the contention that gorillas make war upon one another in Iraq, or upon anyone else--is ludicrous at best.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:30 pm
Setanta wrote:
I suggest that as gorillas are not native to Iraq, and there doubtless never were sufficent gorillas in zoological gardens there to make a significant population, the contention that gorillas make war upon one another in Iraq, or upon anyone else--is ludicrous at best.


oh yeah??? so explain "planet of the apes". c'mon! i dare ya ! Laughing
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:33 pm
Setanta wrote:
I suggest that as gorillas are not native to Iraq, and there doubtless never were sufficent gorillas in zoological gardens there to make a significant population, the contention that gorillas make war upon one another in Iraq, or upon anyone else--is ludicrous at best.

Smile OK! So by default we have a war in Iraq between the Iraq government and Terrorist Malignancy. How about calling it malignancy war. There is sure plenty of malignancy in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:35 pm
How about you look up the word "guerilla."


Don't make life unnecessarily confusing for Ican't, DTOM, that's just not sporting . . .
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:35 pm
We have plenty of malignancy in this country - some are identified as "ican."
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:39 pm
Setanta wrote:
How about you look up the word "guerilla."


Most people spell it "guerrilla."
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:40 pm
That may well be, but its a cinch that few people ever spell it gorilla . . .
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:40 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
We have plenty of malignancy in this country - some are identified as "ican."

Laughing But I don't mass murder civilians. Perhaps the malignancy is actually comprised of those who think ican a malignancy.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:51 pm
Malignancy - having an evil influence.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 01:51 pm
Malignancy = ican.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Mar, 2006 02:04 pm
I can't believe you ever complain about anyone making ad hominem attacks C.I., honestly. Do you ever not include one in a post you make?

Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.69 seconds on 01/21/2025 at 02:55:10