Cycloptichorn wrote:Whereas your primary goal is...? To act like a condescending jerk as much as possible, while avoiding the substance of your opponent's argument?
As much as I disagree with Ican at least he has the decency to actually respond to his opponent's points, rather then just denigrate their entire argument, provide no evidence why it is incorrect, and smugly restate the validity of one's own argument. You do this continually.
Cycloptichorn
What you don't like about my posts, Cyclops, is that I am often highly critical of your posts. I may be condescending (actually, no "may" about it, I often AM condescending), but I do not personally denigrate you, or call your thinking "witless," "clueless," or "brainless," nor do I call your posts "horsey-poop," or call you "stupid" or your brain "calcified."
I call you a "peacenik," and a "leftist," and believe you have a "Euroweenie" mentality, but those are all just terms of endearment.