0
   

THE US, THE UN AND IRAQ, TENTH THREAD.

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 02:35 pm
If Bush's rhetoric is irrelevant, what's yours?
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 02:54 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Is that anything like the Jews stealing the property of Palestinians?

While I have not encountered any evidence of Jews stealing property in Palestine, I bet that there were/are some Jews stealing property from some Arabs in Palestine. I also bet there were/are some Arabs stealing property from some Jews in Palestine. I know such thefts when detected in Israel are punished in Israel. I do not know whether such thefts when detected in Arab Palestine are punished in Arab Palestine. Also, I know that Israel contains both property owning Arabs and property owning Jews. While I know Arab Palestine contains property owning Arabs, I don't know whether Arab Palestine contains any property owning Jews.

While some liberals are Arabs and some liberals are Jews, none of the foregoing has anything to do with the fact that:
ican711nm wrote:
The modern liberal is engaged in man's oldest exercise in moral philosophy: that is the search for a superior moral justification for stealing.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 02:55 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
If Bush's rhetoric is irrelevant, what's yours?

Same as yours!
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 02:57 pm
ican wrote: I also bet there were/are some Arabs stealing property from some Jews in Palestine.

Prove it.

True; our rhetoric is worth absolutely nothing in the world of Bushco.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 03:06 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ican wrote: I also bet there were/are some Arabs stealing property from some Jews in Palestine.

Prove it.

True; our rhetoric is worth absolutely nothing in the world of Bushco.


When I say I bet, I mean to imply that I cannot provide evidence to support my guess.

When I said the same as yours, I was thinking your rhetoric and my rhetoric are equally relevant. But just because they are equally relevant doesn't mean they are equally valid.
0 Replies
 
xingu
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 08:02 pm
I wonder what American can be proud of this mess we have created, of all these lives we have destroyed.

Quote:
Survey indicates Iraqis in despair

Citizens in Iraq and in the US hope to see an end to the presence of American troops in Iraq

More than 90 per cent of Iraqis believe the country is worse off now than before the war in 2003, according to new research obtained by Al Jazeera.

A survey of 2,000 people by the Iraq Centre for Research and Strategic Studies found that 95 per cent of respondents believe the security situation has deteriorated since the arrival of US forces.

The findings follow a poll by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal that found that less than one in four Americans approves of George Bush's administration's handling of the conflict in Iraq.

It also comes as armed men attacked the convoy of Iraq's vice-president and as up to 30 Iraqis were kidnapped in Baghdad on Thursday.
NBC reported that only 23 per cent of respondents backed the president's strategy, representing an 11-point drop since the last NBC poll in October.

Nearly seven in 10 respondents said they felt less confident the war would come to a successful conclusion, NBC said. Fifty three per cent said the US did not have an obligation to killed or wounded American soldiers to remain in Iraq.

'Very poor' government
Bush has said he is considering options for changing US policy in Iraq following the results of the bi-partisan Iraq Study Group report, but has said he will not be rushed into any decision.

"Bush and Blair, with their key aides, should be sent to trial for treason and crimes against humanity and maybe corruption."
Van Zwam, Dendermonde, Belgium

Nearly 66 per cent of respondents to the Iraqi survey thought violence would decrease if US forces were to leave.

Thirty-eight per cent were also "unconfident" that Nuri al-Maliki, the Iraqi prime minister, would be able to improve the situation in Iraq and nearly 90 per cent described the government's implementation of its commitments and promises as very poor.

Of the respondents, 36.5 per cent said they felt the official security forces were unable to keep control in the country.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:03 pm
xingu wrote:
I wonder what American can be proud of this mess we have created, of all these lives we have destroyed.
...
Quote:
Survey indicates Iraqis in despair
...

Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
...
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad
Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad Yes, Iraq is a mess! Crying or Very sad

No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
...
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess. Crying or Very sad
No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad No American is proud of this mess! Crying or Very sad

Idea Now, is that enough pissin' and moanin' for you about Iraq? If so, then perhaps you can now muster the will to start thinking and discussing about how we ought to fix the mess in Iraq. Idea

For the sake of the Iraqis people and the rest of humanity we must fix the mess in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:08 pm
Get out and stay out. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e3ea2fd7a6&o=1
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:36 pm
This article pretty much limits Bush's plan for success in Iraq. Without sufficient foot soldiers, the options are pretty much limited to bait and swtich games that only exposes our military to more death and mayhem without any rest (R&R).

Army moves to reduce strain on troops By LOLITA C. BALDOR, Associated Press Writer
53 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - The Army's top general warned on Thursday that his force "will break" without thousands more active duty troops and greater use of the reserves. He issued the warning as President Bush considers new strategies for Iraq.

As part of the effort to relieve the strain on the force, the Army is developing plans to accelerate the creation of two new combat brigades, The Associated Press has learned.

According to defense officials, the plan may require shifting equipment and personnel from other military units so the two new brigades could be formed next year and be ready to be sent the war zone in 2008. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the plans are not final.

Noting the strain put on the force by operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere, Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker said he wants to increase his half-million-member Army beyond the 30,000 troops already authorized in recent years.

Though he didn't give an exact number, he said it would take significant time, saying 6,000 to 7,000 soldiers could be added per year. Schoomaker has said it costs roughly $1.2 billion to increase the Army by 10,000 soldiers.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:37 pm
blueflame1 wrote:
Get out and stay out.
...

That's not a solution to the problem. That's merely running away from the problem.

That might work for some problems--the ones that don't have to be solved--but not the Iraq problem--it has to be solved. Or else that problem will run after us and grow with each stride in the size of its mess for Iraqis and the rest of humanity.
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Thu 14 Dec, 2006 09:43 pm
ican, you're one of the few who believe the Village Idiot in Chief can solve anything. The man dont even know how to chew a pretzel. Maybe if Bushie bombs Iran people will forget about Iraq? Funny but Americans aint buying that saving humanity bit coming from supporters of mass murder. America voted with Murtha.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 07:46 am
http://www.perlentaucher.de/cdata/K4/T2/A2888/muhammed_jens_julius_hansen_jyllands_posten_cartoons0.jpg
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 07:50 am
General Shoomaker said
Quote:
Though he didn't give an exact number, he said it would take significant time, saying 6,000 to 7,000 soldiers could be added per year. Schoomaker has said it costs roughly $1.2 billion to increase the Army by 10,000 soldiers.


I think they can find the 1.2 billion dollars a lot easier than the can to find recruits willing to enlist and fight in Bush's war.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 11:58 am
blueflame1 wrote:
ican, you're one of the few who believe the Village Idiot in Chief can solve anything. The man dont even know how to chew a pretzel. Maybe if Bushie bombs Iran people will forget about Iraq? Funny but Americans aint buying that saving humanity bit coming from supporters of mass murder. America voted with Murtha.

America voted for a Congress whose majority does not advocate immediate witdrawal. In fact, a majority of Congress does not advocate premature withdrawal; that is, withdrawing before the Iraq governent is capable of protecting the Iraqi people. What they do advocate is changing our strategy in Iraq to a more effective strategy perhaps including deadlines.

But I admit that what the Congressional majority or even a majority of Americans think is the actual risk to Iraqis and the rest of humanity of premature withdrawal, is not necessarily a correct assessment of that risk. After all, the Congress has a lower approval rating by the Americans who elected it than does Bush.

So what is the risk of premature withdrawal to Iraqis and the rest of humanity?

Based on al-Qaeda, Baathists, Hezbollah, Hamas, and al Fatah executed terrorist incidents since May 1996, when al-Qaeda moved from Sudan to Afghanistan, that risk is substantial.

TERRORIST INCIDENTS
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 12:09 pm
au1929 wrote:
General Shoomaker said
Quote:
Though he didn't give an exact number, he said it would take significant time, saying 6,000 to 7,000 soldiers could be added per year. Schoomaker has said it costs roughly $1.2 billion to increase the Army by 10,000 soldiers.


I think they can find the 1.2 billion dollars a lot easier than the can to find recruits willing to enlist and fight in Bush's war.

My hope is that the alleged temporary addition of up to 7,000 soldiers is a cover for bringing in more of the special forces the USA already has in reserve to substitute for regular forces. Special forces are essential for another successful implementation of a covert search and destroy stategy.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 12:11 pm
'another' covert s-d strategy?

Wouldn't you say that during WW2, we had overt s-d strategies?

Also, earlier you mentioned the point that some of the central american struggles were won using your tactics; of course, what you are referring to is the practice of using death squads to remove support for insurgents amongst the populace. Is that what you want for Iraq as well?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blueflame1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 12:23 pm
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 12:37 pm
ican continues his grasp at straws by ignoring how the Americans voted or the latest polls that show they want our soldiers to come home - sooner than later.
0 Replies
 
ican711nm
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 12:39 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
'another' covert s-d strategy?

Wouldn't you say that during WW2, we had overt s-d strategies?

Yes! We had both covert and overt search and destroy strategies in WWII (e.g., such covert strategies were executed by commandos, seals, sabotage and spy teams; such overt strategies were executed by air, sea, and ground forces).

Also, earlier you mentioned the point that some of the central american struggles were won using your tactics; of course, what you are referring to is the practice of using death squads to remove support for insurgents amongst the populace. Is that what you want for Iraq as well?

You almost have it right. I am referring to the practice of using [special forces] to [kill deliberate killers of non-killers] amongst the populace in Central America.

And Yes, that is what I want for Iraq as well.


Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Fri 15 Dec, 2006 01:18 pm
Quote:

You almost have it right. I am referring to the practice of using [special forces] to [kill deliberate killers of non-killers] amongst the populace in Central America.


Well, you are aware that that isn't what happened in central america when we intervened?

The 'special forces' we trained massacred entire villages in order to put down rebellion; is that what you propose?

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 01/15/2025 at 09:45:06