hamburger wrote:
... the general ... did not just talk about iraq and the present situation ; he spoke of afghanistan , his responsibility for his soldiers and what the situation might be several years down the road .
to me , he gave a pretty convincing argument why the present action can no longer be sustained.
...
I readily concede that our present military tactics in Iraq and Afghanistan are not effective. Either those tactics have to be changed to more effective tactics or the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan will deteriorate further.
We have four choices:
(1) Change our military tactics to more effective tactics;
(2) Continue the present tactics until we or our enemy tire of the conflict;
(3) Withdraw from each country
before their governents ask us to;
(4) Withdraw from each country
after their governents ask us to.
A. What are the consequences of each choice to the people of Iraq?
B. What are the consequences of each choice to the people of Afghanistan?
C. What are the consequences of each choice to the people of the western nations?
D. What are the consequences of each choice to humanity?
The general answered only questions A and B for choice 2.
I've posted my recomended tactics here for choice (1) several times. Here's a brief summary:
Covert tactics to locate and exterminate the killers of non-combatants;
Overt tactics to seal the borders of both Afghanistan and Iraq, and to protect the non-combatants of each country from the deliberate killers of non-combatants.
The covert tactics should be employed ruthlessly even when those tactics are expected to unavoidably kill non-combatants too. I claim such covert tactics will rapidly reduce the
total rate non-combatants are killed in each country--both by the deliberate killers of non-combatants, and by the covert tactics--than the total rate non-combatants will be killed by our choosing choices 2, 3, or 4.