0
   

I Say We Duke It Out!

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 12:52 am
Merry Andrew wrote:
I'm enjoying the bout, even though I still don't know what round it is. But those damned emoticons are sure making me dizzy. Or is that their secret purpose?


Nah...they are clearly intended to induce a mass chunder.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 01:44 am
Momma Angel wrote:
Intrepid,

Indeed, Mr. Setanta did not call you an idiot. It was RexReed he actually called an idiot.

I submit such is not the case; in that Setanta never has done any such thing, you are projecting, imposing your preference and prediliction over reality. Setanta has been harshly critical of Rex' (and others') style and substance as posted on these boards, but not of the person of the individual who's interactions here have been subject to his approbation and negative assessment. Close to the edge sometimes, mebbe, but not technically over that edge, at least so far as I've noticed with specific reference to Rex. Of course, its always possible I've missed something.

Quote:
Rules of engagement ...

Hereabouts, the Rules of Engagement are not an abstract, they are prominently featured, enforceable, a matter of maintaining one's interactions in compliance or facing possible resultant sanction. Bear in mind, whether casting bait or rising to it, one so engaged regardless of role is participating in trolling, which, apart from being childish, tedious and a general irritant to most uninvolved onlookers, is frowned on some here.

Some folks play rougher than others, but all are expected to play within the rules. If you see a play you question for that, flag it - hit the Report button, let the judges and referees make the call; that's their job.
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 05:02 am
FYI timber, it was indeed the case:

Setanta wrote:
RexRed wrote:
I just put them out there... and fools like you try to argue... Smile

hey, I learned this stuff in the boyscouts hehe


If you think its OK to call me a fool, why don't i just point out that you are a total goddamned idiot, who relies on the horseshit they fed you in boyscouts. The grown ups here don't fall for that horseshit, but it doesn't surprise me that you do.


http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=1435953#1435953
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 06:29 am
Setanta has in the past had one of those schoolgirl gushing thrums over my addressing him as Set and I have seen him have them elsewhere as well.
He has rules for himself and rules for others which is a behaviour pattern consistent with the schoolgirl mental condition as is an intemperate and sentimental love of particular animals and a need to find methods to be both different from the mass of humanity and superior to it at the same time.
His basic problem is that of having only a very limited range of insult which eventually becomes quite similar to the drone of a distant chain saw.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 06:39 am
Ooh, this fight is good! Now they're taking the gloves off! Wow!
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 06:57 am
(covering eyes..



peeking through fingers)
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 07:03 am
FYI, Yitwail, when someone addresses me as a fool, they pretty much deserve what they get.

Spendi is obsessed with schoolgirls--i suspect its a product of his frustrated desire to get into their nickers. It's a playground trick to hope to get my goat by referring to me in terms such as schoolgirl, and is the sort of thing one would expect from a dypsomaniac. I certainly hope Spendi isn't becoming a dypsomaniac, because it is difficult enough to read the twaddle he puts out there as it is.

Duke it out, indeed--this is quite entertaining.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 09:16 am
That partially explains why you're always in a goofy tit-for-tat with someone, oh puffy and bigworded Mr Setanta - because you get some twisted sort of jollies at it. I say only "partially", because it doesn't explain why you always insist on trying to justify your gratuitous nastiness by pretending you have been deeply wronged somehow. If its just the way you get your geriatric kicks, why don't you forego the pretensions of engaging in any kind of reasonable discussion, and concentrate on formulating your next stupid insult? Save everyone time and save your energy.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 09:43 am
spendius wrote:
Setanta has in the past had one of those schoolgirl gushing thrums over my addressing him as Set and I have seen him have them elsewhere as well.
He has rules for himself and rules for others which is a behaviour pattern consistent with the schoolgirl mental condition as is an intemperate and sentimental love of particular animals and a need to find methods to be both different from the mass of humanity and superior to it at the same time.
His basic problem is that of having only a very limited range of insult which eventually becomes quite similar to the drone of a distant chain saw.

Many of us can display daunting levels of sound and fury--but most of that ilk (of which I am an ilkster) require some identifiable provocation before doing so. Set does not. The level of pompous bombast from that quarter is unequalled.

Amen.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 09:54 am
Well said, Lash.

I think hell just froze over, by the way.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 09:56 am
Laughing
...a blizzard in Hades...
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 10:08 am
white 'holiday' down there? much appreciated i'm sure. Smile
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 10:12 am
Somehow, I don't think Satan and his guests appreciate a Christmas celebration, generated by a conciliatory agreement -- anymore than the anti-Jesu contingent here does.
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 10:29 am
i don't know, even Satan might want a break in the routine once in a while; he's been swamped with work for a very long time, hasn't he?
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 10:59 am
To all
The thing Momma Angel hates the most is being ignored. She posts such offensive, holier than thou statements to get attention. Maybe the best punishment is to ignore her. She will hate that.

BBB
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 11:45 am
This is obviously a good example of two people seeing the same thing --yet getting diametrically opposing viewpoints from it.

From what I have seen, she's been very kind, understanding and she's exhibited a Herculean attempt to be pleasant in the face of extreme rudeness and insult.

Maybe you'll give us some examples of her offensive, holier than thou statements aimed at members. I'm sure we can all provide offensive, demeaning statements aimed AT her.

Let's see what you're talking about.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 12:11 pm
I think Momma Angel and Lash have a vindictive streak under all that religious fervor.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 12:12 pm
Can you give an example of my vindictiveness?

And, while you're at it--my "fervor"?
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 12:14 pm
Re: To all
BumbleBeeBoogie wrote:
The thing Momma Angel hates the most is being ignored. She posts such offensive, holier than thou statements to get attention. Maybe the best punishment is to ignore her. She will hate that.

BBB


well your giving her alot of attention by posting this exact post on other topics?
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Dec, 2005 12:15 pm
If you don't have enough examples already, I won't help you.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 05/18/2025 at 04:13:39