1
   

FIFA World Cup 2006 [R]

 
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:38 pm
I thought Trinidad v. Sweden was the most exciting. Even though it was a t..t..t..t..draw.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:40 pm
Btw: Germany never lost an international match in Dortmund.

Today, it will be for the first time. (And it's not raining, 22°, cloudy)
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:41 pm
fbaezer wrote:

Best refereeing: England-Paraguay
I take that was the 'deliberate mistake'?

You have to be joking, that referee was terrible...and not only the amount of grease on his head.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:43 pm
FreeDuck wrote:
Lord Ellpus wrote:
FreeDuck wrote:
I'll have to watch it when I get home. I was hoping that Tunisia could make a good showing for Africa. A tie is certainly better than a loss.


DRAW....the word is DRAW!!


We use both here in the land of flexible English, Mr. Correctipants.


....you know I love you, really. Any woman who loves the beautiful game, is OK by me.

SET PIECE.

The term has been around for ages, and refers to the tactics used by a team when they are taking a corner, a free kick near the opponents goal, or even a throw in.
Teams rehearse some weird and wonderful things in training, and sometimes they come off, sometimes they don't.
The best one that I ever saw was when two strikers stood near the ball, ready to take a free kick.
They both approached the ball at the same time, and appeared to get in each others way, and started an argument with each other about who was going to take the kick.
While this was going on, a third player ran up to the ball and smacked it into the net.
The defensive wall (and the crowd) were totally fooled.

MARVELLOUS! A set piece to savour.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:46 pm
Trinidad Sweden, definitely.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:47 pm
Thanks for that, LordE. I knew what they were referring to, just had never heard the term before. Maybe it's new to us Merricans, or as a coworker once said, us Merkins.
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 12:51 pm
Right....I've got to make sure that the beer is warm enough, and my curry is just about ready. So.....I'll luv and leave you lot until after the game.


COME ON YOOOOOOO POLES!
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 01:58 pm
At least, we are a bit better in the defense than versus Costa Rica.

Did I tell you already that Podolski is actually Polish? :wink:
(Besides his two chances, I haven't seen much of him ... as of a couple others as well.)

Klinsmann will have to talk turkey.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 02:52 pm
Neuville is, btw, a kind of part-time international for: 57 matches, but only very few (if any) over full time.

Okay, England: we are coming. :wink:
0 Replies
 
fbaezer
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 02:53 pm
Was it Gary Linneker who defined football as a game played by 22 players in which Germany always wins?
0 Replies
 
Lord Ellpus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:02 pm
NEWSFLASH........

Quote from Klinsman "Ve may hav beaten ze poles, but ven ve meet ze Englischers, our Vorld cuppen vill poppenzeekorken"
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:14 pm
... and a morose silence greeted the result of the game in Cafe Sark, Budapest ...as it must have in Warsaw, Copenhagen, Amsterdam ...

Bugger.
0 Replies
 
George
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:16 pm
England better not be looking beyond Trinidad-Tobago.
T&T got a huge confidence-builder with their draw against Sweden.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:18 pm
I didnt like this game, btw. Roughness and nothing that sparkled. And Ballack is a ****.

Up till, like, 15 mins before the end, I was thinking: "and a deserved 0:0 it is..." - but granted, the last quarter the Germans did flood on to the Polish goal time and again, and after that bizarre time hitting the goalpost twice in a row, I guess they deserved to get a goal in.

<grumbles>

(Thats not called a "goal post" I know ... whats it called in English, the part overhead?)
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:23 pm
"bar", yes, thank you Steve (I browsed back.. ;-))
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:23 pm
crossbar...in the states :wink:
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:27 pm
maybe not...getting the footballs mixed up Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:30 pm
panzade wrote:
maybe not...getting the footballs mixed up Embarrassed


No ... it's a "crossbar" here. The "goalposts" are the vertical pieces of the goal.
0 Replies
 
panzade
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 03:32 pm
I hear it called a crossbar in Pee Wee soccer
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Jun, 2006 04:00 pm
Lord Ellpus wrote:
NEWSFLASH........

Quote from Klinsman "Ve may hav beaten ze poles, but ven ve meet ze Englischers, our Vorld cuppen vill poppenzeekorken"

Look who's whistling in the dark ....

Was this a nice game or what?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Should cheerleading be a sport? - Discussion by joefromchicago
Are You Ready For Fantasy Baseball - 2009? - Discussion by realjohnboy
tennis grip - Question by madalina
How much faster could Usain Bolt have gone? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Sochi Olympics a Resounding Success - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/08/2025 at 01:09:48