Our Troops Must Stay

twin_peaks_nikki wrote:

Terrorism cannot be eradicated.

Not even by getting all the terrorists together, and killing them?

0 Replies

Stevepax wrote:

twin_peaks_nikki wrote:

Terrorism cannot be eradicated.

Especially since America is so good at it. I suggest we cease our terrorism of the world before we expect any improvement of the problem.

Obviously you have no concept of the term terrorism.

0 Replies

please define it

0 Replies

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

twin_peaks_nikki wrote:
Terrorism cannot be eradicated.
Not even by getting all the terrorists together, and killing them?

You can send out the invitations, Boss, but i'd say, don't expect much of a response . . .

0 Replies

well it wouldnt read

come and be shot

It would be more subtle, like

er

0 Replies

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

please define it

Please do.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

If you had a trowell, you could not lay on the idiotic and hateful conservative rhetoric any more thickly, McG . . .

Yes ... how dare you use hateful rhetoric against the poor, oppressed terrorists, McG? How insensitive of you.

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

Setanta wrote:
If you had a trowell, you could not lay on the idiotic and hateful conservative rhetoric any more thickly, McG . . .

Yes ... how dare you use hateful rhetoric against the poor, oppressed terrorists, McG? How insensitive of you.

My bad. I failed sensitivty training.

0 Replies

Ah more idiocy from Tico mascarading as thought--he was spreading the rhetoric upon those with whom he disagrees politically, cigar-sucker, not "the terrorists" . . . say, since McG has chickened out, perhaps you could give us a comprehensive definition of "the terrorists" . . .

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
please define it

Please do.

thats the whole problem, I wouldnt have asked you to define it if it was straightforward.

Is Neslon Mandela a terrorist?
Was George Washington?
Were the French Resistance?

Here the Govt is in all sorts of trouble trying to get a bill passed that makes glorification of terrorism illegal. But no one can define terrorism satisfactorily.

Best definition I heard was that a terrorist is a bomber without an aircraft.

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

Ah more idiocy from Tico mascarading as thought--he was spreading the rhetoric upon those with whom he disagrees politically, cigar-sucker, not "the terrorists" . . . say, since McG has chickened out, perhaps you could give us a comprehensive definition of "the terrorists" . . .

Speaking of more idiocy mascaradng as thought...

0 Replies

"Terrorist" will not be defined coherently because it's usefulness will be greatly minimized or erased in the defining.

0 Replies

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

I just heard your President say that he will settle for nothing less than complete victory for freedom...over the evil terrorists.

What's wrong with winning?
I feel the victory of Western civilization over the repressive forces of Islamic fundamentalim is a laudable goal

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

He even alluded to WW2 victory over fascism and WW3? victory over communism. So WW4 is a fight to the death for Freedom over Evil.

We didn't have to kill every Facist in Germany and Italy to gain victory.
We didn't have to kill every Communist in the Soviet Union to win there either.
We just had to do everything in out power to win ... and we did.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

Is Mr Bush completely mad? Does he expect anyone with an ounce of intelligence to actually believe this stuff?

Yes he does, but only if you stop chanting We Hate Bush and Bush is Evil, long enough to listen to his plan.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

How will we know when we have secured complete victory over evil?

The same way we knew we had won against the Fascists and the Communists, when they aren't opposing us anymore.

0 Replies

Quote:

I feel the victory of Western civilization over the repressive forces of Islamic fundamentalim is a laudable goal

Oh yeah. Now there's a real threat. al quaeda will bring down Western Civilization. Sweden, Canada, Switzerland, South Africa, New Zealand, Arkansas all due to be occupied in mere weeks.

Are you happy being this idiotic?

0 Replies

Setanta wrote:

Ah more idiocy from Tico mascarading as thought--he was spreading the rhetoric upon those with whom he disagrees politically, cigar-sucker, not "the terrorists" . . .

You think he was being hateful towards the leftists? LOL. You're a good 10 times more hateful toward those you disagree with on a routine basis.

For example: You felt the need in this thread -- as you so often do -- to resort to personal attacks against both McGentrix and myself ... while neither of us have felt the need to stoop to your level and reciprocate.

As you are so fond of saying: Pot, meet kettle.

0 Replies

Fedral wrote:

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Is Mr Bush completely mad? Does he expect anyone with an ounce of intelligence to actually believe this stuff?

Yes he does, but only if you stop chanting We Hate Bush and Bush is Evil, long enough to listen to his plan.

I dont hate Mr Bush. And I wouldn't know where to begin judging him as evil or not, perhaps you could enlighten me on that.

I think Bush is actually more astute than he appears. His clown like antics in front of a microphone I put down to brain-addle as a result of substance abuse. But I dont hold that against him. Bush knows what he is doing all right, even if he is pretty hopeless in selling it to the public. My question is What is he doing, and why?

0 Replies

McGentrix wrote:

Stevepax wrote:
twin_peaks_nikki wrote:

Terrorism cannot be eradicated.

Especially since America is so good at it. I suggest we cease our terrorism of the world before we expect any improvement of the problem.

Obviously you have no concept of the term terrorism.

McG dear man, the U.S. is the LEAD terrorist nation in the world. We have practiced it for decades. It has now come home to roost. Then you geniuses wonder why?? Duh!!

0 Replies

Tico, you just reek of virtue, as i mentioned on so many occassions. You, along with most of the other rightwingers here, equate scorn for the idiocy you peddle with personal attacks. I know nothing of you personally, less do i have any interest. Get over yourself.

0 Replies

Ticomaya wrote:

Setanta wrote:
If you had a trowell, you could not lay on the idiotic and hateful conservative rhetoric any more thickly, McG . . .

Yes ... how dare you use hateful rhetoric against the poor, oppressed terrorists, McG? How insensitive of you.

Yea, don't you dare speak of Americaq in such terms! Razz

0 Replies

blatham wrote:

Quote:

I feel the victory of Western civilization over the repressive forces of Islamic fundamentalim is a laudable goal

Oh yeah. Now there's a real threat. al quaeda will bring down Western Civilization. Sweden, Canada, Switzerland, South Africa, New Zealand, Arkansas all due to be occupied in mere weeks.

Are you happy being this idiotic?

He most obviously is, he seems most proud.

0 Replies

Our Troops Must Stay

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know