Ticomaya wrote:dlowan wrote:Ah, the tactic again.
Pretending that you think KW said it WAS a bad thing that the killer was convicted, whereas it is clear to anyone reading without intent to twist that he meant that the state ever being beset by such a killer was the bad thing....
The twistinq quibble then being, I suppose, meant to embroil KW into defending against something he never said, and the intent and meat of his post (such as it was, it is but a throwaway line) being ignored...and, if you are lucky, others being drawn into a completely nonsensical and mendacious fray.
This is the type of thing I mean when I point out your ploys as being like those of a lawyer cross examining in a losing case.
Ah, the attempt to analyze.
KW implied the BTK killer was a bad thing, and did it in such a way to imply it was a recent bad thing. "
First the BTK killer, now Intelligent Design in the schools." The point I was making, since you seem incapable of figuring it out for yourself, was KW appears to be completely ignorant of the BTK case. The only other option would be he thinks the BTK being put in prison was a bad thing for Kansas, and that would be stupid, so obviously that is not what KW, nor I, meant.
It was a throwaway line, so
your creating the nonsensical fray is bewildering.
Your ability to analyze me is pathetically bad, Deb. Perhaps you should stop.
Ah, how he wriggles upon his self made hook!
Your hypocrisy in lying as you do,Tico, is interesting in light of your alleged hatred of Clinton for lying>
Tico ploy question:
Why do you only believe lying is significant when under oath? Why do you so clearly support lying in other circumstances?
You propose lying is fine except under oath. Why?
So. How did KW "Imply it was a recent bad thing"?
Even if he did, how does this lead to your lie that he thought convicting this person was a bad thing?
Oh, I know you will quibble and wriggle and say you never said this.......yet, any normal, non bad lawyer, reading your ****, would say this is exactly what you said.
Tico ploy:
So, you admit you lied? You no longer allege LW said that it was a bad thing the fella was convicted.
What is your current lie?
Why do you so support lying?