92
   

Atheists... Your life is pointless

 
 
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 07:53 am
@Frank Apisa,
OK well I hope you do not mind if I continue to point out how hilarious it is for someone who is unsure of themselves to point out another person does not understand things...Because I am now gonna do it, everytime you make a comment about lack of comprehension...
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 08:06 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Just in case you missed it Frank...

http://able2know.org/topic/176688-406#post-5205367

That is all that I am going to say each time you decide to spout I lack comprehension...Till you can rationalize how foolish it actually is to claim...
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 08:08 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,

Quote:
That is all that I am going to say each time you decide to spout I lack comprehension...Till you can rationalize how foolish it actually is to claim...


XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 08:12 am
@reasoning logic,
He is the one who started it mate when he decided to make some bullshit claim like he always tried to go easy on me but I brought it upon myself....

I don't need his protection...

And

It is hilarious and rude, and arrogant, for man who is unsure of himself to try to tell anyone else what they could actually learn...2 Cents
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 09:32 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
well you did not, and I have more to come!


I am sure this means something to you. It is incomprehensible to me.

Quote:
It sure would change things...Cause if you are the one who is lacking, then it is good to find out now, rather than saying that others do...Just because Frank can not understand me...


I am sure this means something to you. It is incomprehensible to me.

Quote:
It is not hilarious nor did I say that I would laugh if I thought somone misread a puzzle or lack of comprehension anyways...

Well I can sympathize because it is incredibly hilarious for someone who is not sure of themselves in many discussions....To find somone else hilarious who is not unsure of themselves...And just misread a riddle...


?????
0 Replies
 
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 09:34 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5205342)
OK, now can you explain how each of those things are not contradictions in the original post you have made directed at me using them all in one post? Or are you unsure you can do it??


I do not even know what in hell you are asking here. Ask a full question...and I will answer if I can.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 09:36 am
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:

I honestly do not think either is "more logical."


Quote:
I cannot comprehend how you can assign probability to the logic involved in any of the possible scenarios.



I do have a hard time understanding how people can not see that a God would be the most complex form ever and for something like that to just exist would be far less likely than a chaotic mess with some parts of this chaotic mess very complex and supporting life and not life that has the ability to create things from nothing.


Could be, RL, but I still cannot assign probability to the logic involved in any of the possible scenarios. THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY that everything always was...and that "all of this" is eternal and infinite.

If so...ANYTHING is possible...and nothing is less probable than anything else.

Do you see what I am saying?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 09:42 am
@Frank Apisa,
Don't worry about it Frank...It does not have anything to do with lack of comprehension...You just do not understand the way I post....And it is mostly my fault...Because my grammar is not very good...But many others do understand me....And I understand them, although you think I do not...I think that you think I do not understand you, or other people, because you can not understand me....because of the way I post...But just because you can not understand me, does not mean I have lack of comprehension for you, or others....And if I am incorrect about any of this...Or have misrepresented exactly how you would explain it, I am sorry...I do understand it...But I truly am not interested in trying to explain it anymore...

If we talk in the future, I will try to explain it in ways you can understand me...I do not feel like doing it right now...

I am not interested in discussing that any longer....

And if you did not understand what I have just said, then if you say you did not, I will try to break it down again...But I am not going into specifics anymore....Or answering the questions you have just asked me...No offense...
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 09:51 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY that everything always was...and that "all of this" is eternal and infinite.


We do not know what is possible when it comes to things that we know very little about. We do not know if it is even possible that "all of this" is eternal and infinite. We may think it is, but it may be impossible for it to always be. I don't know.

Quote:
If so...ANYTHING is possible...and nothing is less probable than anything else.


I am not sure how you think that it is possible when we really do not know if it is possible, it may not be.

Quote:
Do you see what I am saying?


I see what you are saying to a degree
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:00 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5205452)
Don't worry about it Frank...It does not have anything to do with lack of comprehension...You just do not understand the way I post....And it is mostly my fault...Because my grammar is not very good...But many others do understand me....And I understand them, although you think I do not...I think that you think I do not understand you, or other people, because you can not understand me....because of the way I post...But just because you can not understand me, does not mean I have lack of comprehension for you, or others....And if I am incorrect about any of this...Or have misrepresented exactly how you would explain it, I am sorry...I do understand it...But I truly am not interested in trying to explain it anymore...


Interesting sentence!

Quote:
If we talk in the future, I will try to explain it in ways you can understand me...I do not feel like doing it right now...


Yeah, I can tell.

Quote:
I am not interested in discussing that any longer....


Okay...then that should mean you won't discuss it any longer. We'll see how long that lasts.

Quote:
And if you did not understand what I have just said, then if you say you did not, I will try to break it down again...But I am not going into specifics anymore....Or answering the questions you have just asked me...No offense...


Well, there is certainly no offense taken by me. But the English Language may not be so understanding.
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:03 am
@reasoning logic,
Quote:
Quote:
Re: Frank Apisa (Post 5205453)
Quote:
THERE IS THE POSSIBILITY that everything always was...and that "all of this" is eternal and infinite.



We do not know what is possible when it comes to things that we know very little about. We do not know if it is even possible that "all of this" is eternal and infinite. We may think it is, but it may be impossible for it to always be. I don't know.


Unless you are asserting that it is impossible...then we have to assume it is possible.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If so...ANYTHING is possible...and nothing is less probable than anything else.


I am not sure how you think that it is possible when we really do not know if it is possible, it may not be.


Unless you are asserting it is impossible, RL...it has to be possible.

Are you saying it is impossible for "all that is" to always have been?

If you are not...one of the possibilities is that it always has been.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Do you see what I am saying?



I see what you are saying to a degree


Okay, I hope what I said here aids in understanding what I am saying.
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:07 am
@reasoning logic,
I think he is just saying that it is a possibility that everything always was...And if so, then everything would be infinite, and eternal...And have no probable outcomes...Cause it always was...
Frank Apisa
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:12 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
Re: reasoning logic (Post 5205473)
I think he is just saying that it is a possibility that everything always was...And if so, then everything would be infinite, and eternal...And have no probable outcomes...Cause it always was...


Excellent!
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:14 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Unless you are asserting that it is impossible...then we have to assume it is possible.


I am not making any assertions other than we do not know what is possible about the things we do not fully understand. I would not go out on a limb and make a claim that anything we can not prove to be impossible could be possible because that would breath life into a circular argument.

Lets add a few words to your sentence to help bring out the logic.

Quote:
Unless you are asserting that it is impossible to have invisible flying fairies screwing you in both ears...then we have to assume it is possible.


XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:16 am
@Frank Apisa,
One of the reasons why I chose not to discuss it Frank. Is because you do not ask me to explain it, because you do not understand it....But you act nasty in your ways of trying to communicate that to me...Rather than just asking me to explain it more coherently...And one of the reasons why I refuse to do so....

There is absolutley NO REASON WHATSOEVER for you to post about how "the English language is not so forgiving"..."Interesting Sentence!" And "lets see how long that lasts..." Or any of that other garbage you posted, when I was trying to nicely kill the situation....But I just do not think you understood that at all...

Now after posting this just to be nice and acknowledge your posts so that you knew my answers....Because I still think you do not understand what I have been saying...

I gauratee...You will break stones about how I responded....When I and everyone else know that I have....But I felt compelled to answer you so that you may understand what I am saying...Before we finially do kill the whole topic...Because I do not think you understood anything I have said...But I keep trying, and it will only probably be killed for good, once you do get it...

So do you have anything to say before we drop it that is not a personal attack? Can you explain your position without a personal attack towards me? Maybe you will understand what I mean by me asking you that question?
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:16 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
Quote:
I think he is just saying that it is a possibility that everything always was...And if so, then everything would be infinite, and eternal...And have no probable outcomes...Cause it always was...


Do you think it could be possible that it was this way and no God was needed to create it?
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:22 am
@Frank Apisa,
Quote:
Excellent

See what I am talking about Frank? I have shown you that I do understand you...And it seems as though you are still trying to be condescending...Why?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:24 am
@XXSpadeMasterXX,
I think he is trying to find out how far you will kick the can down the road Wink
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:26 am
@reasoning logic,
I think it could be possible, but I do not think it happened that way...

I think a God was needed in order to... And it could not have happened from nothing...
XXSpadeMasterXX
 
  1  
Mon 24 Dec, 2012 10:28 am
@reasoning logic,
Than that is one hell of a malicious thing to do...Would you disagree?

Why would he keep doing it, just to prove a point? Is it not clear that he is not going to drop it nor am I until we both think we see each others points?

I got his, but he is not showing me he understands mine...So if he is truly doing that, that is one F*cked thing to do...

Cause he could just explain to me he understands me, and I will drop it...

But if he does, and won't, he is the one who is doing it to cause problems...Cause he has the ability to stop it...But must not want to then...
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Atheism - Discussion by littlek
American Atheists Barred from holding Office - Discussion by edgarblythe
Richard Dawkins doesn't exist! - Question by Jay2know
The New State Religion: Atheism - Question by Expert2
Is Atheism the New Age Religion? - Question by Expert2
Critical thinking on the existence of God - Discussion by Susmariosep
Are evolution and the big bang true? - Discussion by Johnjohnjohn
To the people .. - Question by Johnjohnjohn
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.55 seconds on 11/24/2024 at 03:46:23