62% of republicans thinks sadam was involved in 9/11

That's funny, since it's the Republicans who seem to want to keep going with the strategy of doing exactly what al quaida wants them to do. Good strategy guys!

Irony lost in a sea of stupidity.

Actually, I shouldn't have used the word Republicans there. I should have said "war-mongering idiots and their supporters." So now that we're there, we now have the choices of either war for years and years and years, or leaving and letting the country become a terrorist state. Yes, those republicans really made the right call going in there and starting this ****. It's a lose-lose situation. Once again, I congratulate Bush and his supporters for a job well done.

If you read the actual letter intercepted from al-Zarahri, you'll see that he wants us to follow the Democrat party line--and the one heard here ad nauseum.

kicky-- You don't base that on reality.

Al Qaeda: Letter Is a U.S. Fake

Quote:

CAIRO, Egypt — A posting on an Islamic Web site Thursday accused the United States of fabricating a letter in which Al Qaeda's No. 2 leader asked for money and laid out the terrorist group's plans for expanding the insurgency in the Middle East.

FoxNews

The contents of the letter? Interestingly, the contents of the letter basically spell out to a "T" everything the President has warned us about will happen if we pull out. The letter states al-Zarqawi and Al-Queda are waiting for the U.S. media to "wear down" America's support for the war on terror and for U.S. troops to pull out so they can take over the entire Middle East and basically launch war and terror attacks on the entire world.

Well, that was certainly convenient timing for the Bush Adminstration wasn't it?

Speaking of the propoganda machine:

CNN - Bush Fakes it

And had Saddam Hussein been hiding WMD development programs and had we not gone in, what then? The situation will certainly arise again in the world at some point.

[12 pages.]

MORI DocID: 1245667

APPROVED FOR RELEASE
DATE: AUG 2005


Intelligence and Analysis on Iraq:
Issues for the Intelligence Community
29 July 2004

[...]

The central focus of national intelligence reporting and analysis prior to the war was the extent of the Iraqi programs for developing weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The analysis on this issue by the Intelligence Community clearly was wide of the mark. That analysis relied heavily on old information acquired largely before late 1998 and was strongly influenced by untested, long-held assumptions. Moreover, the analytic judgments rested almost solely on technical analysis, which has a natural tendency to put bits and pieces together as evidence of coherent programs and to equate programs to capabilities. As a result the analysis, although understandable and explainable, arrived at conclusions that were seriously flawed, misleading, and even wrong.

kickycan wrote:

That's funny, since it's the Republicans who seem to want to keep going with the strategy of doing exactly what al quaida wants them to do. Good strategy guys!

Irony lost in a sea of stupidity.

The fact is that proclaiming constantly that the war was a travesty that should never have been undertaken, and that we are losing, does give aid and comfort to the enemy. You then attempt, pathetically, to turn it around by merely stating without supporting argument that the Republicans are doing what Al Qaeda wants by trying to win, which is absurd.

Brandon9000 wrote:

kickycan wrote:

That's funny, since it's the Republicans who seem to want to keep going with the strategy of doing exactly what al quaida wants them to do. Good strategy guys!

Irony lost in a sea of stupidity.

The fact is that proclaiming constantly that the war was a travesty that should never have been undertaken, and that we are losing, does give aid and comfort to the enemy. You then attempt, pathetically, to turn it around by merely stating without supporting argument that the Republicans are doing what Al Qaeda wants by trying to win, which is absurd.

Talk about pathetic...where is the suport you say you've given for your claim that people who complain about what a f*cked up mess this war is are giving aid and comfort to the enemy. As far as I can see, you haven't provided even one piece of supporting evidence. And do you know why, Brandon?

I think I'll just leave that question there for you. See if you can figure that one out.

Please don't stop doing what you're doing though. Your posts here are pretty damned hilarious. You're killing me!

You wont get your **sed kicked for being American Amigo, just sympathy.

kickycan wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:

kickycan wrote:

That's funny, since it's the Republicans who seem to want to keep going with the strategy of doing exactly what al quaida wants them to do. Good strategy guys!

Irony lost in a sea of stupidity.

The fact is that proclaiming constantly that the war was a travesty that should never have been undertaken, and that we are losing, does give aid and comfort to the enemy. You then attempt, pathetically, to turn it around by merely stating without supporting argument that the Republicans are doing what Al Qaeda wants by trying to win, which is absurd.

Talk about pathetic...where is the suport you say you've given for your claim that people who complain about what a f*cked up mess this war is are giving aid and comfort to the enemy. As far as I can see, you haven't provided even one piece of supporting evidence. And do you know why, Brandon?

I think I'll just leave that question there for you. See if you can figure that one out.

Please don't stop doing what you're doing though. Your posts here are pretty damned hilarious. You're killing me!

What better aid and comfort to the enemy could we possibly give then to invade a sovereign country and turning Iraq into a recruitment posterchild for Al Qaeda's cause?

He did have WMD.
Saddam did hinder UNMOVIC.
The inspectors were heavily mindered.
And, why do you find it so easy to believe Al Quaida?