62% of republicans thinks sadam was involved in 9/11

It was over several things that included WMD and what SH could do with them.

I asked you for a relevant link, Lash.

Sell them to ....any number of people--mostly terrorists, who have no place on the map for us to return fire to.

There wouldn't have been a damn thing we could have done about it.

It was over several things that included WMD and what SH could do with them.

(He DID have them.)

(At some point.)

(Just don't know exactly what he did with them and when he did it.)

I'm not a Saddam fan by any stretch of the imagination, but with inspectors rifling the country --finally gaining access to previously denied locations--because the US military is marshalling on my doorstep, I believe I'd ship my famed WMDs to my buds in Syria, or hide them in one of my vast underground vaults.

I can alwyas get them back when the libs carp at Bush long enough--and they go home.

Plus, I would be deeply grateful for the Democrats who insist Salman Pak and my mobile chemical labs were for...pesticides... I'd be laughing my ass of.

Sorry, DD. I didn't go back to clarify which "several things."

The biggest one was removing such a proven, unpredictable wild man from power. As long as he had access to the military, billions of dollars, a huge country to aid terrorists---he was a threat to world stability. To replace him with a democracy was a brilliant idea.

Lash wrote:

I'm not a Saddam fan by any stretch of the imagination, but with inspectors rifling the country --finally gaining access to previously denied locations--because the US military is marshalling on my doorstep, I believe I'd ship my famed WMDs to my buds in Syria, or hide them in one of my vast underground vaults.

fantasy lash
Steve-- We know he had them. He used them. UNMOVIC had several lists of WMDs and other weapons they KNEW he had. They were not satisfied with Iraqi lies and subterfuges re where the damned things were.

Where are they?

Lash wrote:

I can alwyas get them back when the libs carp at Bush long enough--and they go home.

wrong he never had any
You are completely wrong. It is proven he DID have WMDs. He USED them.

Lash wrote:

Plus, I would be deeply grateful for the Democrats who insist Salman Pak and my mobile chemical labs were for...pesticides... I'd be laughing my ass of.

Sorry, DD. I didn't go back to clarify which "several things."

The biggest one was removing such a proven, unpredictable wild man from power. As long as he had access to the military, billions of dollars, a huge country to aid terrorists---he was a threat to world stability. To replace him with a democracy was a brilliant idea.

I personally helped build and sell these so called mobile chemical laboratories to the Iraqis. I know what I'm talking about Lash you do not.
If you were on site and watched and documented how these labs were used, please produce your information and excuse me. Otherwise, LOL!!! You have GOT to be kidding. You think you are privy to how those untis were used? Why, then, did they require mobile pesticide units??? Educate those who are curious, please.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

Lash wrote:

I'm not a Saddam fan by any stretch of the imagination, but with inspectors rifling the country --finally gaining access to previously denied locations--because the US military is marshalling on my doorstep, I believe I'd ship my famed WMDs to my buds in Syria, or hide them in one of my vast underground vaults.

fantasy lash
Steve-- We know he had them. He used them. UNMOVIC had several lists of WMDs and other weapons they KNEW he had. They were not satisfied with Iraqi lies and subterfuges re where the damned things were.

Where are they?

Lash wrote:

I can alwyas get them back when the libs carp at Bush long enough--and they go home.

wrong he never had any
You are completely wrong. It is proven he DID have WMDs. He USED them.

Lash wrote:

Plus, I would be deeply grateful for the Democrats who insist Salman Pak and my mobile chemical labs were for...pesticides... I'd be laughing my ass of.

Sorry, DD. I didn't go back to clarify which "several things."

The biggest one was removing such a proven, unpredictable wild man from power. As long as he had access to the military, billions of dollars, a huge country to aid terrorists---he was a threat to world stability. To replace him with a democracy was a brilliant idea.

I personally helped build and sell these so called mobile chemical laboratories to the Iraqis. I know what I'm talking about Lash you do not.
If you were on site and watched and documented how these labs were used, please produce your information and excuse me. Otherwise, LOL!!! You have GOT to be kidding. You think you are privy to how those untis were used? Why, then, did they require mobile pesticide units??? Educate those who are curious, please.

He did have WMD.
Saddam did hinder UNMOVIC.
The inspectors were heavily mindered.

As long as he had access to the military, billions of dollars, a huge country to aid terrorists-

(He DID have them [WMD's].)

(At some point.)

(Just don't know exactly what he did with them and when he did it.)

He used the ones Ronnie gave him on the Iranians, among others, and I'm not sure how they define "never" in England, but the US interpretation would make Steve's comment completely incorrect.

Lash wrote:

He did have WMD.
Saddam did hinder UNMOVIC.
The inspectors were heavily mindered.

Lash, do you have difficulty counting to two?

Ahem-ONCE MORE, let's review this.

Hans Blix was sent in with a whole pack of inspectors. When they did, they were indeed not given full access to the country,and were hindered.

Hans Blix told the UN this.

The UN, at Blix's urging, set up a last chance last round of inspections. In this second round, the inspectors were given free, unhindered access to all places in Iraq, even private houses and farms. This means that the Iraq inspection teams were given powers so invasive, they would be totally unconstitional if they did them in America!! That's how much access they had.

And Hans Blix told the UN this. That they had this free and unfettered access. In other words, Hans Blix told the truth.

Yet, all you do is say that the inspectors were hindered-which they were NOT in the last round of inspections. The only hindrance to the final round of inspections was George Bush Jr, who would not let the inspections continue because he wanted to invade-even though the inspectors were giving the very anwers to WMD's that Bush supposedly was seeking.

There were no hindrances in the last round of inspections, Lash. Quit trying to pretend there were.

So it was ok for Saddam to have/use WMD as long as they were the ones Ronnie gave him?


But it was worthy of invasion when he didn't have the ones Ronnie didn't give him?