1
   

62% of republicans thinks sadam was involved in 9/11

Forums: Politics, Idiots
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 05:36 pm
Given the tone many on this thread are using re this issue, it seems it would be infinitely easy to dispatch other opinions.

There should be a tight argument why it is impossible-- for so many of you to have such an attitude about it.

If it's such a simple case, convince me.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 05:37 pm
Refute this with facts. That would be a start.
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 06:03 pm
fact Dick cheney is a lying sack of **** and therefore any awrticle he recommends is bullshit. :wink: Cool
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 06:20 pm
Well, that changes everything.
0 Replies
 
old europe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 06:55 pm
Brandon9000 wrote:
au1929 wrote:
Brandon9000
Here we go again.

It's odd that I can defeat five or six of you at once in argument, and you're reduced to getting personal to try to prevail.

I had a thread about the last round of UN inspections in the Politics section, where some actual progress could probably have been made on this issue, and which was not very conducive to emotional arguments, but it didn't arouse much interest.


You're talking about this thread?

Well, I've been posting something there, but as nobody posted afterwards - including you - I thought that it was not really worth the effort. It could be an interesting thread. Not that people would all of a sudden change their opinions, but maybe it would be possible to compile some of the known facts in order to reevaluate our opinions.

But then, maybe not...
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 07:07 pm
Why are you chuckleheads arguing over some nonsensical blog entry that's over a year old??? lol
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 07:31 pm
Are you saying that 62% of Republicans polled by Gallup ar eno longer chuckleheads (ie the poll is old and superseded by more rational beliefs) or that there was no such poll with such a result, Fishin'?
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 07:34 pm
I'm saying it's old news. The blog entry that was originally linked was from back in Oct 2004. (Click on "the Source" link and look at the date in the URL). Seems silly that there are 3 pages of ranting about year old news.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 07:47 pm
If the opinions have not changed, it is worth comment, I believe.

I do not think such ignorance in an electorate of such a powerful country is harmless.


I doubt it becomes more harmless with time.


Just as I think persistent ignorance in other countries (eg that the US is the devil incarnate and responsible for all Islam's woes) is not harmless.
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 07:54 pm
dlowan wrote:
If the opinions have not changed, it is worth comment, I believe.


There are comments and then there is vitrol....
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 07:59 pm
Lash wrote:
Well, that changes everything.


you're damn right Razz
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:23 pm
fishin' wrote:
dlowan wrote:
If the opinions have not changed, it is worth comment, I believe.


There are comments and then there is vitrol....


Do you think any level of stupidity and ignorance in serious matters, in the midst of better information, is ever worth severe comment?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:25 pm
The 62% have good reason to believe SH was in some manner of cahoots with OBL.

Facts are in their favor.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:27 pm
Lol. Go off sn reread the old Rice thread if you want this silly argument again.


I will just keep laughing at wilful ignorance.
0 Replies
 
Synonymph
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:30 pm
You Bush supporters are incredibly ignorant.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:30 pm
Actually, when I'm the one reading the 911 report and adjusting my opinion to those facts, you are the one who is willfully ignorant.

Why continue to ignore the facts?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:31 pm
Synonymph wrote:
You Bush supporters are incredibly ignorant.

My opinion is based on the 911 report. What do you base yours on?
0 Replies
 
Synonymph
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:32 pm
"Facts."

Facts as you are fed them.

Facts you willingly suck up.
0 Replies
 
Synonymph
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:33 pm
You're really blind, aren't you?
0 Replies
 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Wed 5 Oct, 2005 08:33 pm
"Severe comment"??? Is that what you call members here throwing insults back and forth at each other? lol

Being stupid and ignorant over some stupidity and ignorance that was found by a poll over a year ago doesn't seem to be very productive to me.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » 62% of republicans thinks sadam was involved in 9/11
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 06:48:39
▲ ▼