Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11
Written in spring 2005, a modestly language-corrected version Corrected by another person than the original author.
The photographs attached in this non-profit distribution are for securing volatile, important evidence on 9/11 for discussion and education. Author hereby grants full permission to reproduce the drawing 'The Bombs in the WTC' and his writings. You are encouraged to mail, publish and mass produce these documents or your enhanced versions of them. Due to concerns for his personal safety, the author has chosen to remain anonymous.
Note: This drawing is schematic only. The actual towers were much taller and the observed arch of destruction of the energy-directed thermonuclear device was correspondingly more narrow.
Storax Sedan 104 Kt shallow underground
In the upper picture the explosion is in theory 100 times stronger than in the picture below, but in practice the difference is only four times due to the capability of direction of the small hydrogen bomb.
In the picture at the right, the brown shades caused by a hydrogen bomb are seen, while the top of the tower that is already collapsing is breaking down and the posture straightens up as the hydrogen bomb pulverized the core and it lost all its resistance. The piles point the blasts of the cutting charges.
Steel pillars are turned into dust.
Extremely hot, sublimating pieces are not created with many methods.
For comparison, pictures of subterranean nuclear explosions where the explosion is blasting onto surface and into the air:
Ess1.2 Kt
WTC 2
Banberry 10 Kt underground
Why did they call it 'groung zero' ?
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/military.htm[/quote]
I have found more evidence which suggests the use of 'nukes'.
First : "
Ground zero: The site directly below, directly above, or at the point of detonation of a nuclear weapon."
(Webster's Dictionary of the English Language).
The soil on the island of Manhattan is perfect for building skyscrapers. In midtown Manhattan, BEDROCK is only about 10 feet or 3 meters deep. However, at the location of the Twin Towers in the lower part of Manhattan BEDROCK is about 100 ft or 30 meters deep. There is also the problem of water from New York harbor and the Hudson River. Midtown Manhattan was thus the IDEAL place to build the Twin Towers. When it comes to demolition by nuclear weapons the deeper the foundation the better because depth of soil hides the effects of RADIATION:
Hundreds of weapons of mass destruction have been tested by the Pentagon during the last 50 years. These tests tell them the exact size of the nuke required to knock any building down. Today's nukes are so small that you can carry them in a knapsack.
In the case of the Twin Towers all they had to do was place the bombs directly under the foundations.
In a matter of SECONDS the millions of degrees heat will turn concrete, steel and solid rock into vapor and leave a huge empty space when the foundations stood.
Nuclear explosions have unique seismic signatures!!
All nuclear explosions have unique seismic signatures that are hard to disguise as earthquakes. They are short, sharp tremors that reveal the massive power and speed of the explosion.
Onset of P waves from a Soviet underground nuclear test monitored at a relay station in England.
Seismic waves from the first atomic bomb test at Port Chicago on July 17, 1944.
Seismic signature from the North Tower nuclear explosion.
source
===================
This is really interesting :
Because nanometal provides a higher concentration of energy while requiring fewer raw materials, the overall cost of these weapons would drop, according to Kevin Walter, vice president of technical business development at nanometals manufacturer Nanoscale Technologies. The nanometals can be produced in particles as small as 8 nanometers, Walter says, and then combined with other chemicals to create the explosive materials, which can also be used for non-military applications including pyrotechnics and explosives for mining.
Nanotechnology "could completely change the face of weaponry", according to Andy Oppenheimer, a weapons expert with analyst firm and publisher Janes Information Group.
Oppenheimer says nations including the United States, Germany and Russia are developing 'mini-nuke' devices that use nanotechnology to create much smaller nuclear detonators.
Oppenheimer says the devices could fit inside a briefcase and would be powerful enough to destroy a building. Although the devices require nuclear materials, because of their small size "they blur the line with conventional weapons" Oppenheimer says.
The mini-nuke devices are still in the research phase and may be surreptitiously funded since any form of nuclear prolification is "politically contentious" because of the possibility they could fall into the hands of terrorists
MUST WATCH THE VIDEO CLIPS!
Video 1
view of the northeast corner from 6th Avenue
{ Length 0:47 }
Video 2
video of northeast corner moments
before the South Tower collapse
{ Length 2:29 }
The
source contains copyrighted material, i've posted this for educational purposes.
====
Related Article :
Quote:
Physicist says heat substance felled WTC
Monday, April 10, 2006
Extremely hot fires caused structures to fail, BYU expert says
By Suzanne Dean
For the Deseret Morning News
EPHRAIM -- A Brigham Young University physicist said he now believes an incendiary substance called thermite, bolstered by sulfur, was used to generate exceptionally hot fires at the World Trade Center on 9/11, causing the structural steel to fail and the buildings to collapse.
"It looks like thermite with sulfur added, which really is a very clever idea," Steven Jones, professor of physics at BYU, told a meeting of the Utah Academy of Science, Arts and Letters at Snow College Friday.
Continued...
