Quote:Easy. The collapse started at the point where the planes hit.
You are still trying to debunk a straw man, your 'theory' cannot be applied to the
North Tower and
WTC 7.
Try to use a theory which will support all the three towers, people can easily spot the straw man technique, their not stupid.
1. The official story is that the collapse began when one floor broke, and the pieces fell to the floor below it. Those pieces shattered that floor, and so on, all the way down. However, when the pieces hit the floor below it, they would have slowed down slightly because some of their energy would be used to break the floor. Therefore, there should be a delay every time the pieces hit a floor. The towers had 110 floors, so if it took one second for each floor to be crushed, that would be 110 seconds.
However, the seismic data and video show that the
North Tower collapsed in only
8.4 seconds. The collapse started at about the
94th floor. If you were to drop a rock from the 94th floor, it would hit the ground about
8.4 seconds later. This means that the pieces of the building were falling as fast as objects fall through the air. How can objects crash through steel and concrete floors as fast as they fall through the air?
There is only one explanation. Explosives were placed in these buildings before the attack. The collapse of the North Tower started when explosives at the 94th floor were detonated. The explosives were timed so that the floors were shattered before the rubble contacted it. The pieces of the building fell in only 8.4 seconds because none of the pieces crashed into a floor.
2. Why Has Fire Never Destroyed a Skyscraper Before?
A fire in a 32-story skyscraper in Madrid, Spain, became so intense that it spread from one floor to the next, causing the building to look like a torch. This fire was much larger than the fire at the World Trade Center. The next morning there were still a few fires in the lower floors. Everything inside the building had been burned. Some sections of the building broke. A few portions at the top of the building collapsed. However, the building remained standing, and it continued to support a large construction crane at the top. By comparison, the fire at the South Tower was so small that it never spread to the other side of the tower.
3. Why Does the Government Use the Same Engineer?
The government selected an engineer named Gene Corley to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and Building 7. Corley had also been selected to investigate the bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City in 1995, as well as the fire at the Branch Davidian complex in Waco, Texas, in 1993.
In all three cases, Corley supported the government's theory. However, for those of us who have seen the evidence that the government was involved in those three crimes, we have to conclude that Corley was selected to investigate these crimes because he is one of the few people with engineering credentials who is willing to lie for the government.
A lot of people are willing to secretly commit or cover up a crime, but not many people want to publicly defend a crime. This seems especially true for people who have struggled for years to build up a reputation as a competent scientist or engineer. Therefore, when the government finds an engineer or scientist willing to lie for them, they have to turn to that person again and again.
A few university professors supported the government's theory about the collapse of the towers, but they ignored the collapse of Building 7, and they have not yet responded to critics of their theory. It appears as if they published these theories only because they were pressured to do so, and then they quickly went into hiding.
4.
What Happened to Building 7?
The collapse of Building 7 is the most obvious sign that the government was involved in the attack. This was a 47-story building with a steel frame. It was not hit by an airplane, and it was across the street from the towers. At 5:25 PM, this building collapsed into a tiny pile of rubble. Video and photos show that Building 7 collapsed exactly like old buildings that are brought down by explosives.
The U.S. Government investigated the collapse of this building, but after seven months of investigating, their conclusion was that they have no idea why the building collapsed. A few months later, the landlord of Building 7, Larry Silverstein, announced on television that the fire department demolished Building 7.
If the government was interested in understanding what happened on September 11, they would have asked Silverstein and the fire department to explain what happened to Building 7, but our government officials, university professors, and news reporters are ignoring Building 7. For the government to ignore such a major crime is simply more evidence that they were involved in this attack.
Building 7
This photo shows the largest fires observed in Building 7 on September 11, 2001. Other photographs taken from this vantage point also show fires in the same location, but not elsewhere.
PLEASE TELL ME WHY YOU CANNOT SEE AN EXPLOSION ?
Still can't see an
explosion ?
.jpg)
.jpg)
