4
   

Why does the Bible get misinterpreted so often????

 
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 03:48 pm
neologist wrote:
Questioner wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
spendius,

That would be from a man's perspective and not from God's though.


How do you know?
One needs only to contemplate the issues raised by Satan (beyond the 'doesn't that fruit look tasty?' point of view) to see that this need be settled only once.


If you have the time to explain this I'd love to know how you arrived at this viewpoint. (if this is something you've already covered just say 'I've already covered it moron' and I'll go find it.)
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 03:49 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Questioner,

If that had been God's perspective, I think the Bible would reflect it as such.


We've already discussed, at great length, the contradictions and doubtfulness of the bible. To rely on it as an absolute is rather absurd.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 03:56 pm
Questioner,

Actually, what we have discussed at great length are your perceived contradictions and your doubt of the Bible, not mine.

Well, call me absurd then, because I rely on the Bible as the Word of God.
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 03:56 pm
Fair enough.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:09 pm
dys wrote in his inimitable style-

Quote:
Was no apple that was the temptation, was a tomato.


Yes dys,we do know that.We were attempting to avoid bismirching this thread with such base thoughts.

Anyway-I was trying to quote Eco without looking it up.It's a bit longer than my version.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:12 pm
Momma Angel wrote-

Quote:
That would be from a man's perspective and not from God's though.


What about a woman's perspective?Interesting?
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:24 pm
Questioner wrote:
neologist wrote:
Questioner wrote:
Momma Angel wrote:
spendius,

That would be from a man's perspective and not from God's though.


How do you know?
One needs only to contemplate the issues raised by Satan (beyond the 'doesn't that fruit look tasty?' point of view) to see that this need be settled only once.


If you have the time to explain this I'd love to know how you arrived at this viewpoint. (if this is something you've already covered just say 'I've already covered it moron' and I'll go find it.)
Covered many times; but easy to overlook:

The statement by Satan in Genesis 3: 4,5 to the effect that God was withholding something good from the human pair is a challenge to the rightfulness of God's sovereignty. The entire angelic universe was looking on. How would God react?

I know how I would. . . BZZZZT!

Well, God certainly had the right to zap em all right then and there, but out of love for Adam and Eve's unborn future offspring, he provided a remedy.

Additionally, he has provided time and opportunity for Satan to make his case, even giving him rulership over the world. (John 14:30) There is much more to this, of course, but all will eventually have the opportunity to judge for themselves whether Satan was correct.

Such a decision will stand for all time.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:24 pm
Paul said "It is well for a man not to touch a woman". It is well -- to remain single as I do. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion." (I Corinthians 7:1, 8-9)
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:31 pm
spendius,

When I used the term man's perspective, I was speaking of mankind's. I will be sure to use that distinction in the future.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:31 pm
dyslexia wrote:
Paul said "It is well for a man not to touch a woman". It is well -- to remain single as I do. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion." (I Corinthians 7:1, 8-9)
Now why would Paul say that?

Some would say he was just being arbitrary. But might there be a better explanation?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:34 pm
All I've got to say is that it was a good thing "Peter" didn't say that! LOL
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:35 pm
Besides, JLN said on another a2k forum that we can begin our fornication (or something to that effect) on January 1, 2006.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:41 pm
Well, that lowered the level. :wink:
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:43 pm
Cicerone Imposter Wrote:

Quote:
Besides, JLN said on another a2k forum that we can begin our fornication (or something to that effect) on January 1, 2006.


Well gee, if JLN said it was okay then I guess it's ok. Shocked Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 04:45 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Cicerone Imposter Wrote:

Quote:
Besides, JLN said on another a2k forum that we can begin our fornication (or something to that effect) on January 1, 2006.


Well gee, if JLN said it was okay then I guess it's ok. Shocked Rolling Eyes

Yes, I rely on the authority of mother angel.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 05:26 pm
Don't rely on my authority, dys. I rely on God's.
0 Replies
 
Questioner
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 05:39 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Don't rely on my authority, dys. I rely on God's.


God's the one that made all this mess in the first place. I'll stick with JLN's authority.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 05:41 pm
Me too! JLN doesn't go around killing masses of people because he's angry. Wink
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 05:58 pm
Why not?

What's so special about people?

Just because you are people.That's subjectivism.

If I was God and I got mad I would wipe the lot out and have another go.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Dec, 2005 06:06 pm
BTW-

Does anybody know why the ID thread on Science and Mathematics,those disciplines of objective truth,has been locked?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 11:33:20