what makes a woman?

dragon49 wrote:

i just find it ignorant to believe that because there is a sexual relationship present between a man and a woman that doesn't have deep meaning, the woman is a slut and less honorable and the man is more honorable because he got some.
.

well there can be one individual act of being a slut. or multiple acts. you're more of a slut if you do it repeatedly. its not just about "one" relationship. its about a lifestyle. also its just about meaning, its about caring affection, kindness, love. things less likely to be present in a one night stand.

insulting what someone writes is insulting them. lol. who do think people are? if not determined by what they do. people are determined be their actions. thats part of what honor is, too. all basis by which someone judges you is by what you do. granted its only one thing you do, its still a reflection. also its still insulting to insult what someone did. especially if they take pride in it.

people are determined be their actions..

iknow wrote:

insulting what someone writes is insulting them. lol. who do think people are? if not determined by what they do. people are determined be their actions. thats part of what honor is, too. all basis by which someone judges you is by what you do. granted its only one thing you do, its still a reflection. also its still insulting to insult what someone did. especially if they take pride in it.

You may laugh aloud to your heart's content. That you are unable to comprehend the distinction between criticizing what you do and who you are neither surprises nor constrains me. I can only say that if you take pride in your writing, your standards are extremely low indeed.

iknow wrote:

insulting what someone writes is insulting them. lol. who do think people are? if not determined by what they do. people are determined be their actions..

Yup, and by the way you write. And you write like an ignorant child.

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

insulting what someone writes is insulting them. lol. who do think people are? if not determined by what they do. people are determined be their actions..

Yup, and by the way you write. And you write like an ignorant child.

yoiu're being really mature...

obviously critizicing someones work is critizicing them, since they did it.

iknow wrote:

dragon49 wrote:

i just find it ignorant to believe that because there is a sexual relationship present between a man and a woman that doesn't have deep meaning, the woman is a slut and less honorable and the man is more honorable because he got some.
.

well there can be one individual act of being a slut. or multiple acts. you're more of a slut if you do it repeatedly. its not just about "one" relationship. its about a lifestyle. also its just about meaning, its about caring affection, kindness, love. things less likely to be present in a one night stand.

i am wondering if you realize that you are hearing from three happily married women, in committed, loving relationships? bella, shewolf, and i are all married. i would find it amazing if you were, and i pity the woman immensely.

secondly you did not answer my question as how it is that a a man and a woman are in a relationship that doesn't have deep meaning and the woman is a slut and less honorable and the man is more honorable because he got some? and please, i would like some SUPPORT to your answer.

iknow wrote:

obviously critizicing someones work is critizicing them, since they did it.

No, that's not obvious. What is obvious is that you are thin-skinned, in addition to displaying the prudery of a middle-aged Victorian virgin and the writing skills of an elementary school student.

dragon49 wrote:

iknow wrote:

dragon49 wrote:

i just find it ignorant to believe that because there is a sexual relationship present between a man and a woman that doesn't have deep meaning, the woman is a slut and less honorable and the man is more honorable because he got some.
.

well there can be one individual act of being a slut. or multiple acts. you're more of a slut if you do it repeatedly. its not just about "one" relationship. its about a lifestyle. also its just about meaning, its about caring affection, kindness, love. things less likely to be present in a one night stand.

i am wondering if you realize that you are hearing from three happily married women, in committed, loving relationships? bella, shewolf, and i are all married. i would find it amazing if you were, and i pity the woman immensely.

secondly you did not answer my question as how it is that a a man and a woman are in a relationship that doesn't have deep meaning and the woman is a slut and less honorable and the man is more honorable because he got some? and please, i would like some SUPPORT to your answer.

because women want to be respected. they want to get things from a relationship. men just want sex. women are likely to get more from the guy if the guy stays with the woman. instead of the guy just being there for sex.

all someone is is their actions. if they didn't any actions they would in a life supported vegetative state.

because women want to be respected. they want to get things from a relationship. men just want sex. women are likely to get more from the guy if the guy stays with the woman. instead of the guy just being there for sex.

iknow wrote:

because women want to be respected. they want to get things from a relationship. men just want sex. women are likely to get more from the guy if the guy stays with the woman. instead of the guy just being there for sex.

so women get more by men staying with them? women are made better because a man stays in a relationship with them? wow, that is the most chauvanistic thing i have heard in a long time. so if a woman just wanted sex out of the relationship, by your rationalization above, they would be more honorable?

iknow wrote:

because women want to be respected. they want to get things from a relationship. men just want sex. women are likely to get more from the guy if the guy stays with the woman. instead of the guy just being there for sex.

so women get more by men staying with them? women are made better because a man stays in a relationship with them? wow, that is the most chauvanistic thing i have heard in a long time. so if a woman just wanted sex out of the relationship, by your rationalization above, they would be more honorable?

I'm beginning to think this joker is about twelve years old and seriously repressed and deluded by a prudish background.

idontknowsquat wrote:

all someone is is their actions. if they didn't any actions they would in a life supported vegetative state.

SUPPORT ! ! !