what makes a woman?

iknow wrote:

you know what i meant. calling someone else crap is worse than someone doing inproper grammar. there is some honor for you.

The writing of this is pretty piss-poor, too. I didn't call you crap. I called your silly school-boy trick of quoting someone's post and then simply writing "Support?" crap. And i called your writing drivel. That may be unpleasant for you, but it does not constitute calling you names. What a pathetic attempt to defend your drivel.

Setanta wrote:

iknow wrote:

you know what i meant. calling someone else crap is worse than someone doing inproper grammar. there is some honor for you.

The writing of this is pretty piss-poor, too. I didn't call you crap. I called your silly school-boy trick of quoting someone's post and then simply writing "Support?" crap. And i called your writing drivel. That may be unpleasant for you, but it does not constitute calling you names. What a pathetic attempt to defend your drivel.

support?

The official position,often stated,of the Roman Catholic church is that if no possibility of conception exists "sex" is not taking place.One may wish to give what is taking place another name but I'll refrain from suggesting one.Thus,I think,The Church would line up with "i know" and against people trying to defend their own past or present behaviour with self-serving semantics.

To discuss "sex" without any reference to children produced by it,or not,is irresponsible.And the State has a direct interest in those children.And it also has an interest in disease and social stability and the possibilty in a sexually promiscuous environment of incest taking place without the knowledge of the parties.

shewolfnm wrote:

so then, if i am using the word nig**r in a meaningful, directed, purposeful targeted, academic, stuidious context.. then it doesnt mean nigg*r at all?


your logic leaves me dizzy

it means nigger. its effect is different, however.

You're kidding, right?

iknow wrote:

Setanta wrote:

iknow wrote:

you know what i meant. calling someone else crap is worse than someone doing inproper grammar. there is some honor for you.

The writing of this is pretty piss-poor, too. I didn't call you crap. I called your silly school-boy trick of quoting someone's post and then simply writing "Support?" crap. And i called your writing drivel. That may be unpleasant for you, but it does not constitute calling you names. What a pathetic attempt to defend your drivel.

support?

You're kidding, right?

Bella Dea wrote:

You're kidding, right?

No, he's not kidding. It's the only way he knows to respond to that which he cannot comprehend. He's unaware that the support is easily found by reading the post in question, simply because he doesn't understand what's been said to him.

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

And if no one gets hurt, have all the sex you want.

get your head out of the sand.

Who does it hurt, when the two consenting adults, have sex? You?

i'm just saying don't give broad, unsupported adivce.

Because you give SUCH good advice with your "Slut Reformation". Please.

how does comparing my advice to yours acomplish anything really, we're trying to achieve a goal here.

no i'm serious. there is nothing pisspoor or crappy about my writing. take it to the english forum please.

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

And if no one gets hurt, have all the sex you want.

get your head out of the sand.

Who does it hurt, when the two consenting adults, have sex? You?

i'm just saying don't give broad, unsupported adivce.

Because you give SUCH good advice with your "Slut Reformation". Please.

how does comparing my advice to yours acomplish anything really, we're trying to achieve a goal here.

There is no way in hell anyone could "compare" your advice and mine. First of all, because you have no advice; simply labels. And second, no one wants advice from someone who is going to judge them and call them names. Seriously. And just what goal are you trying to reach? To convince us that we are all sluts and need reformation?

bella, you slut you...
shewolf, you slut you...
dragon, you slut you...

oh wait got carried away...

you know what i meant. calling someone else crap is worse than someone doing inproper grammar. there is some honor for you.

no i'm serious. there is nothing pisspoor or crappy about my writing. take it to the english forum please.

iknow wrote:

no i'm serious. there is nothing pisspoor or crappy about my writing. take it to the english forum please.

Oh crap...I almost peed myself when I read this......

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

iknow wrote:

Bella Dea wrote:

And if no one gets hurt, have all the sex you want.

get your head out of the sand.

Who does it hurt, when the two consenting adults, have sex? You?

i'm just saying don't give broad, unsupported adivce.

Because you give SUCH good advice with your "Slut Reformation". Please.

how does comparing my advice to yours acomplish anything really, we're trying to achieve a goal here.

There is no way in hell anyone could "compare" your advice and mine. First of all, because you have no advice; simply labels. And second, no one wants advice from someone who is going to judge them and call them names. Seriously. And just what goal are you trying to reach? To convince us that we are all sluts and need reformation?

support

i just find it ignorant to believe that because there is a sexual relationship present between a man and a woman that doesn't have deep meaning, the woman is a slut and less honorable and the man is more honorable because he got some.
.

iknow wrote:

you know what i meant. calling someone else crap is worse than someone doing inproper grammar. there is some honor for you.

Quote:

no i'm serious. there is nothing pisspoor or crappy about my writing. take it to the english forum please.

Horsie poop. Your sentences are not consistently coherent. I did not call you, or anyone crap, so that means either that you willfully lie to attempt to put yourself in a sympathetic light, or you were incapable of distinguishing criticism of your writing from criticism of your person. You have misspelled improper. The sentence "there is some honor for you" is not referentially structured to the foregoing false claim, so that one must make an effort to divine your meaning. Your writing sucks, and so do the ideas you have advanced in this thread. I'll state it here, because it is germane, and because you lack any authority to send someone to another forum just because you don't like what's been said to you.

Your writing is piss-poor, and your attitudes toward women are worse.

Your writing is piss-poor, and your attitudes toward women are worse.

iknow wrote:

you know what i meant. calling someone else crap is worse than someone doing inproper grammar. there is some honor for you.

Quote:

no i'm serious. there is nothing pisspoor or crappy about my writing. take it to the english forum please.

Horsie poop. Your sentences are not consistently coherent. I did not call you, or anyone crap, so that means either that you willfully lie to attempt to put yourself in a sympathetic light, or you were incapable of distinguishing criticism of your writing from criticism of your person. You have misspelled improper. The sentence "there is some honor for you" is not referentially structured to the foregoing false claim, so that one must make an effort to divine your meaning. Your writing sucks, and so do the ideas you have advanced in this thread. I'll state it here, because it is germane, and because you lack any authority to send someone to another forum just because you don't like what's been said to you.

Your writing is piss-poor, and your attitudes toward women are worse.