2
   

SUPPORT Cindy and OUR TROOPS! Countrywide Vigils Tonight

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 07:48 pm
DtOM's just following tico's lead. Seems tico thinks his readers have vision troubles.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 07:54 pm
I'm not sure of the numbers, dlowan. She is getting a lot of flack from the other side for these people showing up. Some is also aimed at the Left / Liberal / Dems in general as the type of people or groups that are also anti-war and therefore must also be Democrats.

However, it's not as if there's major contributions to the party flowing in from the "knuckle draggers" or "mouth breathers" so the rhetoric is shallow and most people know it.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 07:57 pm
So - I don't know how Nazis and such go in Amrica.

What on earth is their attraction to an anti-war movement? Especially a war against Muslims?

I'd have thought they would be out rallying for Bushco?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:02 pm
"Its a Jew War! The Jews are controlling America!! Stop the Jew War!!!"----racists who agree with Cindy's remark, "My son shouldn't have died for Israel!"

They think she's sympatico. Because she is.

She said it.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:04 pm
Lash wrote:
Actually, DTOM, although it is nice for you to make your letters big, when I started my post, yours wasn't there. I just checked the times, and it seems odd to me--but I've been buzzing between a threeple of boards and not refreshing screens. But, anyway--I said what I wanted to say.

...the random freak... = any random freak. Do you know the names of all the racists at Camp Casey?


yep. ya bashed the liberals. and that's all you ever want to say. at least these days.

see, if you really had an "issue" to discuss, you would answer my question (no matter the font size ) and tell us just what random freak(s) you refer to.

surely there's one in mind, since that specific random freak would have to be known before the liberals could cheerfully malign the conservatives for their association with them. wouldn't they ?

no, i don't know the names of the racists heading for the camp.

but i find it odd that, while i do indeed cheerfully castigate them (since a person has to have at least one good quality to be maligned.. ) and their presence anywhere on planet earth, you seem to be over joyed of their appearance.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:05 pm
Is it that - like the weird Hanson alliance draw thing - that they think they are representing the poor slobs who go and get killed, while the rich war-mongerer's kids get to stay home?
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:07 pm
ehBeth wrote:
DtOM's just following tico's lead. Seems tico thinks his readers have vision troubles.


Laughing welll, i guess the font was a little big...
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:09 pm
Careful - you know what they say about people with big fonts............




heheheheeheheheh
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:12 pm
Lash wrote:
"Its a Jew War! The Jews are controlling America!! Stop the Jew War!!!"----racists who agree with Cindy's remark, "My son shouldn't have died for Israel!"

They think she's sympatico. Because she is.

She said it.


it's a pretty big stretch to equate "my son shouldn't have died for israel" to "fire up the furnaces", lash.
0 Replies
 
DontTreadOnMe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:15 pm
dlowan wrote:
Careful - you know what they say about people with big fonts............




heheheheeheheheh


n'yuk, n'yuk, n'yuk ! :wink:
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:18 pm
[size=7]What do they say about people with tiny fonts?[/size]
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:23 pm
DontTreadOnMe wrote:
Lash wrote:
"Its a Jew War! The Jews are controlling America!! Stop the Jew War!!!"----racists who agree with Cindy's remark, "My son shouldn't have died for Israel!"

They think she's sympatico. Because she is.

She said it.


it's a pretty big stretch to equate "my son shouldn't have died for israel" to "fire up the furnaces", lash.


I don't think the newly arrived racists at Camp Casey have called for a furnace re-firing, either. They just know she's on their wave-length and feel a sense of belonging.

And, I do have a bit of fun returning the bashing. It's sort of pathetic to sit still and get kicked repeatedly. So, I don't.

The Dems are getting a taste of what they have been dishing out for decades.

And, I'm LOVING IT!!! Karma. Gotta love it! Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:25 pm
The kicker is: her son didn't die for Israel. And, I think only someone who harbors an overarching bigoted hatred for Jewish people in general, and the big vat of them in Israel, in particular, would say or think such a thing.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:54 pm
ehBeth wrote:
Seems tico thinks his readers have vision troubles.


What do you mean, ehBeth?
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 08:58 pm
Can anyone find a legitimate reference to the supposed e-mail from Cindy to Nightline claiming her son died for Israel?

All I'm getting from Google are right wing blogs. No legitimate news sources appear to be reporting it.

The earliest reference appears to be Duke himself reading it and claiming to have the same view. Now where did he get it from?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 09:01 pm
She sent out a mailer.

But, squinney, she also said it live at a gathering in support of Lynne Stewart in CA.

They've got it on tape and audio--and witnesses.

There's no way to deny it.
0 Replies
 
squinney
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 09:10 pm
Where? Got a link?
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 09:20 pm
squinney wrote:
Where? Got a link?


LINK
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 09:24 pm
Something you'll find is a proclivity for left leaning publications to veer toard support and right leaners to carry this more often than lefties.

However, the event had to be covered by a smattering of sources, so I'll bring them until you're comfortable she said it.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2124500/?nav/fo/

This one is good because it's clickable--and run by a big liberal, who wouldn't let Hitchens lie about the quotes.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Sat 27 Aug, 2005 09:27 pm
My personal favorite.

But, read the clickables. Same thing--but gotta love the venue!!

http://judicial-inc.biz/cindy_sheehan_Israel.htm
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/09/2025 at 05:34:47