Suppose we could get TIco to post his.......never mind.
The truth is snowballing to an avalanche.the Bush people thinks they can stop it . There getting buried. Look how they talk. pseudo logic
dlowan wrote:Ticomaya wrote:In your dreams, bunny.
Absolutely.
I think we've established, if nothing else, that dlowan dreams about my ass.
I would assume. All that live in the real world... and have read what you have written... would come to the conclusion you are 'perhaps'a real "ass"
Foxfyre wrote:Suppose we could get TIco to post his.......never mind.
Ticomaya wrote:dlowan wrote:Ticomaya wrote:In your dreams, bunny.
Absolutely.
I think we've established, if nothing else, that dlowan dreams about my ass.
Nightmares.
Horrible, horrible nightmares.
Mind you - unlike most rabid righties - I MIGHT consider Tico as a brief toyboy.
He appears to have a neurone which he uses from time to time.
Lawyers have always been my weakness.
Like chocolate and gin....
lightfoot wrote:I would assume. All that live in the real world... and have read what you have written... would come to the conclusion you are 'perhaps'a real "ass"
Not in the real world ... I just play one on A2K.
And SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO well!
<shaking my booty in dlowan's general direction>
Just tormenting you, Deb. Suffer!
Still, without dreams life would be sooooo drab.
dlowan wrote:Let's go for it Lash.
You get started on creaming all th efolk on your side who you think are unfair and mean.
When you get - oh say - a hundredth of the way through, let me know - and I'll start on the left.
Fair?
So far, I think I am WAY up on you in taking on the excesses of my lot.
Until then, stop with that pathetic tactic.
It is meaningless and you make yourself ridiculous with it.
You take up so much space to say so little.
The meaning, since it escapes you--is you can stow your pitiful yammering about what we do when your buds do the same thing. Nobody's buying it.
Ticomaya wrote:<shaking my booty in dlowan's general direction>
Just tormenting you, Deb. Suffer!
Heeehee......hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......but men don't generally have much of a booty to shake, so your booty shaking is bootless.
But then, you have a big
cigar.
Lash wrote:dlowan wrote:Let's go for it Lash.
You get started on creaming all th efolk on your side who you think are unfair and mean.
When you get - oh say - a hundredth of the way through, let me know - and I'll start on the left.
Fair?
So far, I think I am WAY up on you in taking on the excesses of my lot.
Until then, stop with that pathetic tactic.
It is meaningless and you make yourself ridiculous with it.
You take up so much space to say so little.
The meaning, since it escapes you--is you can stow your pitiful yammering about what we do when your buds do the same thing. Nobody's buying it.
THAT'S what you got?????!!!!!!!!
I have to wonder how much Lash, Tico, or Fox actually care about the statements by Cindy that they claim to be anti-semetic. Why the vicious defense of the Jews?
I doubt it has anything to do with sincere outrage over bigotry. More likely they are just forwarding the GOP talking points fabricated in an attempt to quiet Cindy.
You wouldn't see the same outrage if it was any number of other groups.
No outrage over Arnolds statements or treatment of women.
No outrage over Trent Lott publicly suggesting that segregationist policies would have benefited America.
No outrage over ALOT of Rick Santorums ridiculous bigotry towards homosexuals. Tom DeLay called Santorum's remarks on homosexuality "courageous". Mr. Bush of course had the usual "confidence" he generically expresses in anybody on his team, claiming Santorum was doing a good job as party leader and is "an inclusive man".
No outrage over anti-Catholic rhetoric of last years campaign, or Bush's failure to repudiate the confederate flag, or KKK comments by several southern republicans, etc.
And, this but a small sample of the bigotry carried by REAL republican representatives. Cindy isn't even an elected official!
So, I really wonder just how sincere this outrage can be towards Cindy, and why it would be "different.".
Squinney writes
Quote:I have to wonder how much Lash, Tico, or Fox actually care about the statements by Cindy that they claim to be anti-semetic. Why the vicious defense of the Jews?
I doubt it has anything to do with sincere outrage over bigotry. More likely they are just forwarding the GOP talking points fabricated in an attempt to quiet Cindy.
You wouldn't see the same outrage if it was any number of other groups.
No outrage over Arnolds statements or treatment of women.
No outrage over Trent Lott publicly suggesting that segregationist policies would have benefited America.
No outrage over ALOT of Rick Santorums ridiculous bigotry towards homosexuals. Tom DeLay called Santorum's remarks on homosexuality "courageous". Mr. Bush of course had the usual "confidence" he generically expresses in anybody on his team, claiming Santorum was doing a good job as party leader and is "an inclusive man".
No outrage over anti-Catholic rhetoric of last years campaign, or Bush's failure to repudiate the confederate flag, or KKK comments by several southern republicans, etc.
And, this but a small sample of the bigotry carried by REAL republican representatives. Cindy isn't even an elected official!
So, I really wonder just how sincere this outrage can be towards Cindy, and why it would be "different.".
I doubt Squinney has a clue what Tico, Lash, or Fox think based on the previous post which is largely irrelevant to any discussion that has taken place. When she shows me her posts indicating outrage over the very sins committed by Democrats/the Left for which she accuses others, then perhaps she would have more moral authority to point fingers at others and she might be less inclined to presume to judge Tico, Lash, and Fox..
You got some examples, such as Squinney provided, of such "sins" committed by the Democrats, over which she should feel outrage?
Or are you just typically indulging in vague personal notions as opposed to hard evidence?
There are many things that iritate me in life, but one of my all time favorites are those people who are finatical towards one political party or another. Has it ever occured to anybody else(besides me) that there are an equal number of jacka$$e$ on both sides? No one party has the advantage.
Tico says he has a very nice jackass.
Well that's pretty broadminded wouldn't you say?
