1
   

Should we handle victory the way the Christian god decrees?

 
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2005 07:42 pm
What stuns me is that the right looks at this rock-ribbed, re-born in the blood, evangelical Christian woman and wonders if she is conservative enough!!

Besides becoming a rubber stamp for the right to life crowd, it would interesting to know what part Ms. Miers played in the Terri Schiavo affair, what exactly would the right accept as a proper candidate?

Joe(Just asking)Nation
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 13 Oct, 2005 10:23 pm
Joe Nation wrote:
In the spirit of hyjacking this thread , now that President Bush has made religion, LINK a pre-qualifier for selection to this nation's highest court, perhaps we should forward Frank's questions to the Senate Judiciary Committee's Minority Counsel so that Harriet Miers could attempt to answer them.

====
LIVE ON FOX..... THE COMMITTEE MEETS MS MEIRS

Senator Blah Blah..."So please tell the Committee where in the Bible you find that God the Father is kind and loving and clear up the matter about killing all the men and boys in a conquered city, if you would."

Ms. Miers: "I'd be happy to Senator. The Senator should remember or be advised that unlike civil laws, the kinds they make in buildings such as these, God's Laws are elastic, plastic, stretchable and as discardable as an old pair of panty hose. Take that one you mentioned about the conquered city, now most would see that in conflict with the Commandment 'Thou shalt not kill.' but not a real Christian. A real Christian can stretch that 'not kill' to Kansas and back and find a dozen ways to kill that are okay and sometimes more than okay. Sometimes to kill can be holy."

Senator "er"

Miers: "And don't worry your pretty head about God being nice. We just make that up. We know God is a horrible, powerful thing who is able to snuff us out like a bug, but that's depressing, so we just talk about God's love for us as if it's real. And it is. It's as real as He is."

Senator: "How real is that?"

Miers: "Beats the hell of me. I just joined the evangelicals because they have better music than the Catholics and in Texas, really, the only people who are Catholics are Mexicans anyway, so I made the move and I just love the big choir. But you were asking about picking and choosing which of God's laws we follow. We just do what's right, we don't meddle with that slavery stuff anymore, just like all those silly dietary rules, but we do stick by our guns, literally, I guess, ha ha, when it comes to gays. That's just icky and we won't put up with it. Oh, and I know Christian are supposed to sell all and follow Christ, but who's kidding who about that. Give me a preacher in a two thousand dollar suit, beads of sweat on his brow, choir pumping up the bass line in the background while he tears up about the Blood and being born in it. That's about as real as it gets, right?"

Joe(The Committee thanks the nominee for appearing...)Nation


Thank you, Mr. Nation. That's both funny and scary.
P
0 Replies
 
Implicator
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 12:50 pm
Frank Apisa wrote:
Implicator wrote:
So absolutely no effort to answer this at all?


Implicator...

...I am still waiting for you to produce material from the Bible that shows the god of the Bible on the scene...where the thrust of the scene does not have the god threatening, punishing, killing, or asking others to kill.

So far...the only passage you and Intrepid have produced...is the scene in Genesis where the god allows a 90 year old woman to get pregnant!!!!


Of course not, we produced much more than that - stop being silly.

Your decision to reject what we have produced is based on your choice of when a "scene" begins, and when it ends. Obviously, if you choose the start and end of the scene, you will make sure that it includes this god in an act of threatening, punishing, or killing. I could choose scene boundaries of my own that do not include these actions, yet include this god showing love and compassion.

(BTW, this is further example of that old nagging question of objectivity vs. subjectivity that has haunted you every step of the way in this thread.)


Quote:
When you produce any scenes that do not have the god threatening, punishing, killing or asking others to kill...we will discuss them.


No you won't. What you will do is claim that the thrust of the "scene" is God's threatening or punishing, because it is your subjective opinion that this is the case. But when pressed to justify that opinion, you retreat to "but you haven't given any examples …."


Quote:
I don't think you can...so you are attempting to build a gigantic straw man in an effort to avoid acknowledging that you cannot.


Nah … no straw man here. I'm not claiming your position is something other than it is, so that I can burn it down. I am claiming that your position is subjective, meaning that it carries no warrant beyond being your opinion. I am claiming that you haven't "demonstrated" or "shown" anything other than that your opinion is such and such.


Quote:
Mention whatever you want EVERY TIME you post...and I will mention this fact.


Thank you, I will. This is a perfect place to poke at that big ol' thorn in your flesh …

There are examples galore of this god showing the qualities that these theists say it has. Most of these examples, however, can be shown to also demonstrate qualities of sovereignty and holiness, as this god has them all (according to the Bible).

In short, whether or not anyone can sufficiently demonstrate to you a "scene" where the "thrust" is love (other than Sara's child), your implied conclusion (that this god is horrible) is a non-sequitur
.


Quote:
Allow me once again to thank you for entertaining me this way...and for helping me to make my point.

You are a dream come true.


I wonder if you are really so gullible as to listen to your own rhetoric and believe you are making your point, and not mine.

No matter.

I
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 01:45 pm
So God really does love humanity, but apparently He loves them in the same way as an alcoholic might. Smashing human skulls in the middle of the night, then by day, gathering the remnants of the people together to share their strengths and declaring that God's son and daughters are steadfast not despite their trials, but because of them.

Maybe God should take some Parenting classes.


I hope He does before He devastates the world with avian flu again.

Yes, the bad press God gets in the Bible is a worrisome thing. You would think He would have had the foresight to hire a better public relations man than Moses and had all the smiting and wrath of God stuff stuffed and only the many, many examples of God being a really swell guy, protecting his flock as the Good Shepherd, making everybody to lay down in green pastures and so on, becoming the main thrust of the book. Instead, any blind poke of a finger amongst the pages is likely to reveal God in His Fury, God in His Wrath, God laying waste and travail, while his children hunker down and wait for Him to stop swinging and go from blitzed to blissed.
(Try reading that last sentence aloud. Laughing )

Anyway kids, stay out of his way when He's angry.

Joe(Without Him, you've got nobody to blame but yourself and Nature)Nation
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 01:47 pm
Good post, Joe Nation, as usual. Thanks. Wink
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 01:53 pm
Perhaps God figured man had enough sense to read both the Old and New Testament and understand that in order to know the full character of God (just as in knowing the full character of anyone) you have to take the whole story into consideration?

Again, always from the Old Testament and disregarding the New Testament and the teachings of Christ. I am beginning to think that some just don't want to believe in the goodness of God. I wonder why that is?
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 01:58 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Perhaps God figured man had enough sense to read both the Old and New Testament and understand that in order to know the full character of God (just as in knowing the full character of anyone) you have to take the whole story into consideration?

Again, always from the Old Testament and disregarding the New Testament and the teachings of Christ. I am beginning to think that some just don't want to believe in the goodness of God. I wonder why that is?


Don't forget that the folks for whom the first half of the book was written, claim no ownership of the second half.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 02:07 pm
And some that accept the second half don't accept the first half. Such confusion! LOL
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 02:19 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
And some that accept the second half don't accept the first half. Such confusion! LOL


Oh, they accept it. They just know the difference between the old covenant and the new covenant. The confusion is only with those with blinders and a closed mind.
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:41 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Perhaps God figured man had enough sense to read both the Old and New Testament and understand that in order to know the full character of God (just as in knowing the full character of anyone) you have to take the whole story into consideration?

Again, always from the Old Testament and disregarding the New Testament and the teachings of Christ. I am beginning to think that some just don't want to believe in the goodness of God. I wonder why that is?[/[/size]quote]

The New Testament didn't change God. It changed the relationship between God and Man. The gates of heaven which had been closed due to Original Sin were opened by the sacrifice of Christ, but that didn't make God the Father Mr. Nice Guy, heck, He allowed His Son to be beaten to a pulp and hung on a cross.

Just what level of goodness can be expected from God? Is there any level of expectation of that goodness turning into God's protection, the proverbial, Hand of Providence? Or is that beyond belief?

Don't get me wrong, the ideas of Christ could probably save millions of human lives if they were ever fully implemented, but except for a couple of bands of 1st Century monastics and a couple of people I knew during the Civil Rights Struggles of the 1960's, Christ's teachings of Loving each other, seeking Justice in the face of Civil Authority, eschewing riches to follow the Way and struggling to spread the word of Peace throughout the world despite the actions of your enemy*, have been co-opted, stretched, covered, mis-interpreted or ignored.

Meanwhile, while Jesus is Lord, His Father is still the Person of God in Charge, right? If you talk to Him, tell I said we could use some goodness and mercy right about now, down there on the Gulf Coast and in the Gulf Region of Iraq/Iran, in the sunken towns of East New Jersey tonight and in the crushed cities of Kashmir, over in Darfur and in the AIDS clinics of Russia. Oh, and there's a little girl in Brooklyn who was abandoned on the street at two AM by her mother's murderer and a sparrow or two He needs to keep his eye on.

Me? I'm doing okay and I hope you are too.

Joe(*these can be accomplished without relying on a fiction.)Nation
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 03:59 pm
Joe Nation, If you continue to perpetuate the myth of the bible god, the people still suffering from Katrina and the floods back east will not think too kindly of you. Wink
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 04:01 pm
Joe,

I can only tell you I think it is sad that you seem to be blaming God for the ills of the world. Now, if I am incorrect in that, please forgive me.

If your best friend jumped in front of a bullet for you, how would you feel about him? Would you see what he did as a despicable act or one of love?

It seems that everyone would love for God to jump in there and fix everything. But where is our responsibility? We are the ones that need to be taking care of the world. Afterall, it is the way it is because of mankind. This is not the way God made it.

C.I.,

Perpetuate the myth? Well, if you mean all the churches here in Northern Louisiana are perpetuating the myth, do you think those thousands of evacuees being housed in them are thinking unkindly of those church people?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 04:15 pm
Earthly shelters doesn't help the fact that god was responsible for Katrina.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 04:17 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
Joe,

I can only tell you I think it is sad that you seem to be blaming God for the ills of the world. Now, if I am incorrect in that, please forgive me.

If your best friend jumped in front of a bullet for you, how would you feel about him? Would you see what he did as a despicable act or one of love?


If it was the same guy that fired the bullet, I would think that mighty weird.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 04:38 pm
God wasn't responsible for the choice people made to build their homes on flood plains, even below sea level. When you build your house near the sea in a hurricane zone, sooner or later you're going to have a hurricane. When you build your house on a fault line, it is reasonable to expect earthquakes. When you build on an unstable hillside, you take the risk of a landslide.

It is not God's fault that people erroneously assume they are immune to natural consequences and/or don't want to accept the consequences of the choices they make. And for those who were not informed of the hazards, their quarrel is with the shysters who sold them a bill of goods and not with God. Still there are those who will blame God just the same.

It is like that with the God of the Old Testament too, I think. God hasn't changed. But the people's understanding and perception of Him changed as they evolved as a people.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 05:26 pm
Cicerone Imposter Wrote:

Quote:
Earthly shelters doesn't help the fact that god was responsible for Katrina.


Ok, now I am really confused. Weren't you one of the ones that was making jokes about some religious types saying the very same thing?

So, does this mean YOU think that God sent Katrina to New Orleans for a reason? If so, why do you think that is?

MesquiteWrote:

Quote:
If it was the same guy that fired the bullet, I would think that mighty weird.


It wasn't God that killed Christ. It was men.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 05:32 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
Earthly shelters doesn't help the fact that god was responsible for Katrina.


So, you agree that there is a God? Why do you blame all the bad on God but ignore the good?
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 05:36 pm
C.I. I swear - for all the world, it sure looks sometimes as if you will say ANY damn thing to get a rise. After months of arguing against the existence of God, now you want to blame God for hurricane Katrina.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 05:41 pm
Just want to show how ridiculous it is to believe there's some omnipotent being out there watching out for man.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Oct, 2005 05:42 pm
Even Fox goes so far as to blame man for building their homes on this planet that god built.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 11/06/2024 at 01:33:57