Intrepid wrote:tycoon wrote:Hi Frank,
This is an epic thread, one that I have followed from page one. Thank you.
May I suggest that you're being too kind about this Sarah business. You have allowed for this story, occupying a few sparse verses in Genesis 17, to be an exception to your challenge to not find a threatening god on the scene.
It was even posited by MA that Sarah, 90 years old, was wanting a child. There is nothing in those verses to support this. I agree with Phoenix, what 90 year old woman would wish for this? What a burden.
Where is the kindness in this story? I wish you would retract your exception.
Regards,
tycoon
Some people only view things as their narrow views today will allow. Why is 90 years of age old for that time? People are listed as living hundreds of years. Why put your concept of time on something that you know nothing about? Frank's exception? Frank is not ruler of the universe. Frank does not have all of the answers.
Well, Intrepid, let's assume the story is correct, that Sarah was 90 and Abraham 99. When Abraham learned we was going to be a father, he did the modern day equivalent of ROFLMAO (verse 17). We can infer from his reaction that doing the horizontal mamba was a thing in his distant past.
His humor didn't last long, however. God was about to institute the practice of circumcision, which wiped the smile off his face rather quickly, we can imagine.
But the larger question is: Where is the benevolence in this story, especially when we consider Sarah? She is treated like a piece of property, and at no time is she consulted or asked what her wishes were. It's Abraham's seed this, and Abraham's seed that.
I would like to appeal to Frank to rescind his one exception. He's being too generous. There is nothing kind about this story.