8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:01 am
HokieBird wrote:
No, that was not his contention.


Really?

http://www.able2know.com/forums/posting.php?mode=quote&p=2706970

Quote:

Wow. what a world okie must live in. He thinks people went to jail for Whitewater. I wonder which mythical persons went to which mythical jails for a crime concerning Whitewater.

Not one person went to jail for any crime associated with Whitewater okie. Here is the IC's report. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/onpolitics/transcripts/whitewater_032002.html There were no indictments for crimes associated with Whitewater. There were no convictions for crimes associated with Whitewater. But if you want to believe things that aren't true. I guess we can't stop you. Libby was convicted of a crime. That doesn't make him innocent in the real world but in your world of up is down it seems it does.


I see that his contention was 'Not one person went to jail for any crime associated with Whitewater.'

McG's list of people convicted is immaterial to the question of who did jail time and who didn't.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:09 am
James McDougal was the only person who spent time in prison, but his conviction was based on bad loans from his S&L.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:22 am
McGentrix wrote:
Did you even bother to read your own source Parados?

There is an entire appendix about the prosecutions.

http://icreport.access.gpo.gov/final/v1app5.pdf

Are you going to simply admit you were wrong and be done with this?


Obviously you didn't read my source because THAT is precisely where I have quoted from. That appendix lists the charges against each person and whether they pled guilty or were convicted.

So, not only have I read it. I quoted it to you. Perhaps you should go read it and then you could tell me which conviction was from criminal activity that involved Whitewater. I have not denied there were prosecutions. I have only stated that NONE of those prosecutions were for crimes directly involving Whitewater.

If we want to claim that any conviction from the Whitewater investigation is a conviction for Whitewater then we should also be willing to state that any conviction in the investigation into the outing of a CIA agent is a conviction for the outing of a CIA agent. But this leads us right back to okie's world. It is only if he says it is.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:28 am
cicerone imposter wrote:
James McDougal was the only person who spent time in prison, but his conviction was based on bad loans from his S&L.

Several people convicted during the Whitewater investigation spent time in jail. Hale, Hubbell, Wade, Matthews, both McDougals. None of them were convicted for crimes about Whitewater.

From a purely logical standpoint, you can't argue that peripheral crimes in one investigation are nonsense but peripheral crimes in another are directly related to the investigation. It makes no sense.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:31 am
parados wrote:
cicerone imposter wrote:
James McDougal was the only person who spent time in prison, but his conviction was based on bad loans from his S&L.

Several people convicted during the Whitewater investigation spent time in jail. Hale, Hubbell, Wade, Matthews, both McDougals. None of them were convicted for crimes about Whitewater.

From a purely logical standpoint, you can't argue that peripheral crimes in one investigation are nonsense but peripheral crimes in another are directly related to the investigation. It makes no sense.


This was actually my point when it came to Clinton's impeachment, but I see that the Whitewater angle works as well, thanks.

What is it with the Republican penchant for using whatever definitions of words they please? I was in a heated argument this weekend over the Libby trial with someone who apparently felt that the word 'nepotism' means anything you wish.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:34 am
Then:

parados wrote:
There were no convictions for crimes associated with Whitewater.


Now:

parados wrote:
I have only stated that NONE of those prosecutions were for crimes directly involving Whitewater.


You didn't use the word "directly" in your first statement. I was addressing your first statement.

There have been convictions for crimes associated with Whitewater.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 11:54 am
HokieBird wrote:
Then:

parados wrote:
There were no convictions for crimes associated with Whitewater.


Now:

parados wrote:
I have only stated that NONE of those prosecutions were for crimes directly involving Whitewater.


You didn't use the word "directly" in your first statement. I was addressing your first statement.

There have been convictions for crimes associated with Whitewater.

Actually no. The PEOPLE were in some cases associated with Whitewater.
The crimes were not. None of the crimes had anything to do with Whitewater. The crimes were discovered in the process investigating Whitewater but it doesn't mean the crimes were associated (connected, joined, related) with Whitewater.

You are attempting to argue that my sentence has no meaning. It does have meaning. You don't get to change that meaning to make your claim accurate. None of the crimes were related to Whitewater. None of the crimes were associated with Whitewater. The only possible relationship to Whitewater and any of the crimes is Susan McDougal may have used a small part of an illegal loan to pay some bills for Whitewater. That is a specious connection at best. It would be like saying the casino is involved in a bank robbery if the robber gambles some of his ill gotten gains.
0 Replies
 
HokieBird
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 12:49 pm
Since you rely on the findings of the IC, here's the conclusion:

The Madison Guaranty-Whitewater investigation resulted in the conviction of 12 defendants, including former Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker, Jim and Susan McDougal, and former Associate Attorney General Webster L. Hubbell. This office investigated whether Jim and Susan McDougal committed any crimes in connection with Madison Guaranty, C.M.S., or Whitewater Development by using control of two financial institutions -- Madison Guaranty and Madison Bank and Trust -- to lend money to or for the benefit of Whitewater Development and to pay Whitewater Development financial obligations at a time when the McDougals and the Clintons jointly owned Whitewater Development. In May 1996, Jim and Susan McDougal were convicted in federal court in Arkansas of various crimes involving Madison Guaranty, C.M.S., and Whitewater Development. According to one federal bank regulatory agency, the failure of Madison Guaranty cost the taxpayers $73 million.

LINK
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 01:51 pm
Quote:
4. United States v. James B. McDougal, Jim Guy Tucker, and Susan H.
McDougal.194
As discussed in detail above, James and Susan McDougal and Jim Guy Tucker were
involved in the $825,000 loan scheme. Each played crucial roles in coordinating and executing
the scheme, and each was eventually convicted of two or more felony counts.
a. Indictment.
On August 17, 1995, a Little Rock grand jury returned a multiple-count indictment
against the McDougals and Tucker, who was then Governor of Arkansas.195 The indictment
charged 21 counts:
Count1: All three defendants were charged with conspiracy in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 371 regarding the various fraudulent transactions related to the $825,000
Dean Paul loan.
Counts 2 and 3: All three defendants were charged with wire fraud in violation
of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 regarding two different SBA transfers of funds to CMS in
response to the infusion of the "profits" from the Dean Paul loan.
 Count 4: McDougal and Tucker were charged with savings and loan fraud by
submitting false loan documents to Madison Guaranty in regard to the Dean Paul
loan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344.
 Counts 5, 6, and 7: These charges related to McDougal's role in the fraudulent
loan to Kuca. Count 5 charged him with mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1341 for causing Hale to submit the fraudulent Form 1031. Count 6 charged
McDougal with fraudulently concealing from the FHLBB his role in the supposed
advance of commissions to Kuca in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1006. And Count 7
charged McDougal with aiding and abetting the making of false statements to the
CMS, a federal licensed SBIC, regarding this loan in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 
1014 and 2.
 Counts 8 through 11: McDougal and Tucker were charged with various felonies
related to the $65,000 loan to Smith. Count 8 charged them with mail fraud in
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 for causing Hale to mail to the SBA false forms to
accomplish the fraudulent scheme. Count 9 charged them with aiding and
abetting the misapplication of the proceeds of this loan in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 657 & 2. Count 10 charged them with aiding and abetting the defrauding of
the SBA regulators by making false entries into records in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§§ 1006 & 2. Count 11 charged them with aiding and abetting the false
statements to CMS to procure the $65,000 loan in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014
& 2.
 Count 12: All three defendants were charged with mail fraud in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 1341 for causing Hale to mail a false Form 1031 to the SBA in relation
to the CMS loan to Castle Sewer and Water.
 Counts 13 through 16: These charges related to the McDougals' roles in the
fraudulent $300,000 Master Marketing loan. Count 13 charged them with mail
fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 for causing Hale to mail a fraudulent Form
1031 to the SBA in connection with the loan. Count 14 charged them with
misapplying the loan proceeds, and aiding and abetting the misapplying of the
proceeds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 657 & 2. Count 15 charged them with
making false entries in CMS records, and aiding and abetting the making of false
entries, regarding this loan, which were made to deceive the SBA auditors in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1006 & 2. And Count 16 charged them with making
false statements to CMS and aiding and abetting the making of false statements in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 & 2.
 Counts 17, 18, and 19: The counts charged McDougal in relation to the 1308
xli
Main Street land flip transactions. Count 17 charged him with misapplying the
loan proceeds of the $125,000 loan secured by the 1308 Main Street property, and
aiding and abetting such misapplying of proceeds, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
657 & 2. Count 18 charged him with misapplying the funds of Madison
Financial, and caused the misapplying of funds, regarding the $18,000 supposed
rent payment to Bill Henley in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 657 & 2. Count 19
charged McDougal with making false statements, and causing such statements to
be made, in the records of Madison Guaranty, namely that Henley owned the
1308 Main Street property since August 1, 1985, to justify the $18,000 "rent"
payment in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1006 & 2.
 Counts 20 and 21: The counts charged Governor Tucker in relation to the
October 1987 fraudulent Southloop loan from CMS. Count 20 charged Governor
Tucker with misapplying, and aiding and abetting the misapplying of, this loan in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 657 & 2. Count 21 charged him with making, and
aiding and abetting the making, of false statements in the records of CMS in
violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1006 & 2

Quote:


part of the loan to Mrs. McDougal was used
to fund Whitewater Development's down payment on another piece of property, and to help
retire a Whitewater debt, conferring a benefit on the Whitewater Development, jointly owned by
the McDougals and the Clintons.

Quote:
About criminal conduct that occurred involving Whitewater Development:
 Jim McDougal engaged in numerous financial transactions for the benefit of Whitewater
Development involving Madison Guaranty and other corporate entities. Many of these
transactions were fraudulent. Jim McDougal was convicted of felonies in May 1996
arising from a series of fraudulent transactions he committed involving Madison
Guaranty and CMS. Susan McDougal was convicted of felonies in May 1996 involving
the fraudulent loan she received from CMS.
 Chris Wade, a real estate developer in Flippin, Arkansas, committed bankruptcy fraud
his purchase of Lot 7 of Whitewater Estates. Wade pleaded guilty in March 1995.

This is all the IC lists as being criminal with Whitewater. Note that the McDougals were only convicted based on CMS and Guaranty, nothing to do with Whitewater. Note that Wade was convicted of Bankruptcy fraud by hiding his ownership of a piece of property that he bought in the Whitewater development.

Quoting the NYTimes doesn't change the facts as represented in the IC report.

But if we can rely on just news reports for our facts, I am sure I can find a news report or 2 or 12 that states Libby was convicted in the investigation on the outing of a CIA agent. Would that suffice to show that Libby was convicted directly related to the outing of a CIA agent?
0 Replies
 
Roxxxanne
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 02:40 pm
What does Whitewater have to do with the Libby case?

Fitzgerald: Jail Libby Now

Quote:
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 03:18 pm
Roxxxanne, the claim has been made by your side that like the Libby situation, nobody was convicted of anything concerning the Whitewater investigations besides Clinton lying under oath. Hokiebird is arguing the case very well that there were. Unlike the Libby situation where no other crime has been established or prosecuted besides Libby being convicted for lying. That is the connection of this argument over Whitewater to the Libby affair.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 03:53 pm
okie wrote:
Roxxxanne, the claim has been made by your side that like the Libby situation, nobody was convicted of anything concerning the Whitewater investigations besides Clinton lying under oath. Hokiebird is arguing the case very well that there were. Unlike the Libby situation where no other crime has been established or prosecuted besides Libby being convicted for lying. That is the connection of this argument over Whitewater to the Libby affair.


Clinton wasn't convicted of lying under oath for the Whitewater investigation at all. It was the Lewinsky scandal, and there was no underlying crime.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
okie
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 03:55 pm
Didn't it all start with Whitewater, cyclops, and before it was over, it encompassed the entire cess pool surrounding Clinton's tenure? That has been so long ago, frankly I would like to forget it.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 04:02 pm
okie wrote:
Didn't it all start with Whitewater, cyclops, and before it was over, it encompassed the entire cess pool surrounding Clinton's tenure? That has been so long ago, frankly I would like to forget it.


And I as well.

But I think you will admit that there was no underlying crime which led to Clinton's perjury. And yet, it was somehow still valid. I would love to see you reconcile that with your belief that Libby's perjury was not valid.

What more, Clinton wasn't supsected of illegal activity, but immoral - something which the modern GOP claims isn't relevant any longer, only if people 'acted within the law.' Once again there is something of a disconnect between previously held attitudes about governance and the Rule of Law, and the mordern ones displayed.

This is the entirety of the Clinton diversion; please return to your normal thread conversation Smile

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 04:20 pm
thank god!
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:22 pm
Fitzgerald argued today to the court that there is no reasonable expectation of Libby's conviction being overturned so he should go to jail.

I guess the judges won't see this as "nonsense." But then they have an understanding of the law.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:23 pm
But that still leaves an option for Bush.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:27 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
But that still leaves an option for Bush.

Of course it leaves Bush with an option..

But if he does it won't appease what okie refers to as the "Bush haters", or as I like to refer to them, "the majority of Americans."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:33 pm
It's not surprising that the "majority" of Americans are dissatisfied with Bush; Bush acts like a king, not the president of a democracy.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Jun, 2007 05:33 pm
HokieBird wrote:
To date, most of those convicted of crimes have involved the Arkansas phase of Whitewater. On Aug. 17, 1995, Starr obtained an indictment of then-Arkansas Gov. Jim Guy Tucker and the McDougals, and on May 28, 1996, all three were convicted of charges related to Whitewater. On April 28,1996, Clinton delivered four hours of videotaped testimony on behalf of the defense in the first Whitewater trial. He also testified in the second Whitewater trial -- of Arkansas bankers Herby Branscum and Robert Hill. A hung jury forced a mistrial and Starr has decided not to retry the case.

James McDougal was found guilty on 18 of 19 felony counts of conspiracy and fraud; Susan McDougal was found guilty on four of four felony counts. He will begin serving his sentence in early summer. She is awaiting sentencing and now is imprisoned for her refusal to answer a grand jury's questions and also is awaiting trial on charges of embezzlement in an unrelated matter.

Following his conviction on two of seven felony counts of conspiracy, Tucker resigned as governor and could face up to 10 years in prison. The following individuals also have been convicted or have pleaded guilty to Whitewater-related crimes:

* Stephen Smith (former Clinton political adviser and business partner of McDougal) pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor;

* Eugene Fitzhugh (owner of Townsend Financial Services, which received the $300,000 Hale loan) got a one-year sentence;

* Madison real-estate dealer Robert Palmer was given three years probation;

* Webster Hubbell pleaded guilty to two felony charges of defrauding the Rose Law Firm and served 18 months of a 21-month sentence;

* David Hale received a 28-month sentence and three years supervised release;

* Arkansas banker Neal T. Ainley got two years probation for crimes connected to Clinton's 1990 gubernatorial race;

* Whitewater real-estate broker Christopher Wade was sentenced to 15 months in prison and three years probation;

* Appraiser Charles Matthews was sentenced to 28 months in prison, serving 16;


ARTICLE



Whitewater was a land deal in which Clinton was a partner. I don't think any of these crimes was related to that deal.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/28/2025 at 11:01:59