8
   

Fitzgerald Investigation of Leak of Identity of CIA Agent

 
 
okie
 
  0  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 12:27 am
@genoves,
To be accurate, outing Valerie Plame was never established as a crime by Fitzgerald. Fitzgerald never clearly established that a crime had been committed, not even after years of investigations, yet he finally indicted Libby over lying about a crime that apparently never occurred. Now how great is that?

By the way, what in the world has happened to Fitzgerald? I thought he was actually working on Blago in Illinois, but he hasn't done anything, or at least he hasn't been heard from lately. Is he also hiking the Appalachian trail?
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 08:39 am
@okie,
You are so lame. Val's views about WMD and Iraq, if any, are immaterial to the issue that the Bush people outed her for political revenge purposes. Doing this is obviously a crime on a number of counts. Wilson was correctly ticked off when Bush lied in the State of Union about yellow cake, again lying to the country and the world. Wouldn't you call out Bush were you to know that he lied to the public? Probably not, since you are not really a patriot like Wilson is.
okie
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:30 am
@Advocate,
It is important what Valerie Plame believed, as documented in her book, which I think proves that the program carried on by her husband was purely political. If Wilson truly had the final conclusive evidence as he claimed, surely he would have been able to convince his own wife of that. Yet, that did not happen, then he ended up writing his op-ed as part of a vendetta against Bush. It does appear to me it was nothing more than something personal, a personal grudge against Bush, that has been my argument from Day 1 on this issue. And I also believe elements in the CIA were busy at work trying to cover their own backsides on this issue, to cover up their own failures. Another aspect to this, Wilson had no authority to speak for the CIA, none. If he had information, it should be passed through the chain of command, and the CIA director would report to the administration. It makes no sense to have dozens of opinions coming out of the CIA, how do you know which to believe. You don't, thats the point. Bush listened to the head of the CIA, which he did, and he was told WMD was a slam dunk. If the head of the CIA had trouble sorting through his own organization to deliver the accurated intel, thats his problem, and if he doesn't, then the president has to hold him responsible.

We have argued this issue backwards and forwards, but Wilson clearly overstepped his bounds, was nothing more than a loose cannon carrying out a vendetta against Bush for political purposes. I hope Bush covers this in his book.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:37 am
@Advocate,
okie always uses misinformation or his drummed up ideas about any topic; he's never provided evidence or credible sources for his opinions.

From About.com:
Quote:

The State Department analyst present at the meeting was skeptical that the alleged uranium contract could be carried out because it would be hard to hide such a large shipment of yellowcake, noting that the French "would seem to have little interest in selling uranium to the Iraqis." State also though sending Wilson to Niger was redundant and suggested embassy officials (no surprise, embassies are part of the State Department) "would be able to get to the truth on the uranium issue." (40)


Never mind Wilson was sent by State under Bush's administration.
okie
 
  0  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:40 am
@cicerone imposter,
We've discussed all of that, ci. Wilson got to go because he wanted to. He even paid his own way. And you think he did serious intel over a cup of tea? Come on, ci. As I said, if he got the final scoop, how come he didn't tell his wife?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 09:47 am
@okie,
You are unable to arrive at the "normal" conclusions about any topic you speak to. If the State department sent Wilson to Niger, that is the "authority" that was provided by our government. Whether there was any ulterior motive on Wilson's part is immaterial; he only told the truth and confirmed what the State department already knew. (He didn't lie.)

Your inability to see the facts from the evidence presented makes you incapable of finding truth in anything.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Reply Wed 24 Jun, 2009 02:47 pm
Okie is full of it. Wilson's findings in Niger and subsequent (patriotic) op-ed piece had nothing to do with Val. He was sent to Niger because he was a distinguished diplomat familiar with the area. He easily discovered that Iraq was not seeking yellow cake, and told the CIA. Btw, he didn't pay his own way, but did not insist on getting paid for other than expenses.

Outing Val is a separate issue, and was clearly against the law. The Bush people disclosed classified info, violated the IIAA law, and other laws. Fitzgerald, who was deceived by Libby, was a complete failure, as history will say.
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 12:18 am
Okie wrote:

By the way, what in the world has happened to Fitzgerald? I thought he was actually working on Blago in Illinois, but he hasn't done anything, or at least he hasn't been heard from lately. Is he also hiking the Appalachian trail?
********************************************************************

He is preparing for the trial of Blagojevich. Just yesterday, Kelly, Blago's fund raiser, got three years in the slammer!
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 12:19 am
Okie_ I don't think that Advocate is aware of the background of the Plame case. Not the following( If you wish to read a great link, go to "Who is Lying about Iraq" by Norman Podhoretz)

Note:

Libby stands accused of making false statements to the FBI and of committing perjury in testifying before a grand jury that had been convened to find out who in the Bush administration had “outed” Valerie Plame, a CIA agent married to the retired ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, IV. The supposed purpose of leaking this classified information to the press was to retaliate against Wilson for having “debunked” (in his words) “the lies that led to war.”

Now, as it happens, Libby was not charged with having outed Plame but only with having lied about when and from whom he first learned that she worked for the CIA. Moreover, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor who brought the indictment against him, made a point of emphasizing that


[t]his indictment is not about the war. This indictment is not about the propriety of the war. And people who believe fervently in the war effort, people who oppose it, people who have mixed feelings about it should not look to this indictment for any resolution of how they feel or any vindication of how they feel.

This is simply an indictment that says, in a national-security investigation about the compromise of a CIA officer’s identity that may have taken place in the context of a very heated debate over the war, whether some person"a person, Mr. Libby"lied or not.
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 12:20 am
Even Obama, the Messiah, did not back Plame.

Note:

Plame v. Cheney#Appeal
The Wilsons have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their appeal of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruling. On May 20, 2009, the Justice Department, in a brief filed by Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, and Justice Department attorneys Mark B. Stern and Charles W. Scarborough, took the position that, "The decision of the court of appeals is correct and does not conflict with any decision of this Court or any other court of appeals,...Further review is unwarranted." Melanie Sloan, an attorney for the Wilsons and the executive director of the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, released a statement that read, "We are deeply disappointed that the Obama administration has failed to recognize the grievous harm top Bush White House officials inflicted on Joe and Valerie Wilson...The government's position cannot be reconciled with President Obama's oft-stated commitment to once again make government officials accountable for their actions."[31]

According to the brief filed by the Justice Department:

"Petitioners allege that Novak's July 14, 2003 column publicly disclosed Ms. Wilson's covert CIA employment and that that disclosure 'destroyed her cover as a classified CIA employee.' Petitioners, however, allege that Novak's source was Armitage, and do not allege that any of the three defendants against whom Mr. Wilson presses his First Amendment claim-Cheney, Rove, and Libby-caused that column to be published. In the absence of factual allegations that Mr. Wilson's alleged injury from the public disclosure of his wife's CIA employment is 'fairly traceable' to alleged conduct by Cheney, Rove, or Libby, petitioners have failed to establish Article III jurisdiction over Mr. Wilson's First Amendment claim
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 08:34 am
It is just out that Fitzgerald will be assigned to uncovering Gov. Sanford's fervid relationship with Maria of Argentina. Sanford has claimed that he was officially applying stimulus to his package.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 04:19 pm
@Advocate,
Quote:
Bush people outed her for political revenge purposes. Doing this is obviously a crime on a number of counts.


Then why were no charges filed?
Why was nobody indicted?
Why didnt Fitzgerald determine that a crime had been committed?
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 04:37 pm
@mysteryman,
mm, All good questions.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Jun, 2009 04:42 pm
@cicerone imposter,
From FactCheck:
Quote:
The Wilson-Plame-Novak-Rove Blame Game
July 22, 2005
Updated: November 23, 2005
Both sides twist and hype the case of a CIA agent's leaked identity. We document what's known so far.
Summary
The disclosure of CIA agent Valerie Wilson’s identity has triggered a partisan blame game complete with distortions and misstatements by both sides. Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman said the agent’s husband Joe Wilson falsely claimed Vice President Cheney authorized his trip to Africa " a claim Wilson never actually made. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid said on the floor of the Senate that the leak “put this agent’s life in jeopardy,” a claim for which no evidence has surfaced.

Here we won’t attempt to debunk every false or misleading claim. We thought our readers would be better served by a timeline documenting what is publicly known so far, with citations for each fact and links to original source whenever possible.

We have no idea whether Karl Rove or anybody else has broken the law, something that can only be decided by a judge and jury should any charges ever be brought. Some information remains classified, and we can't know what facts the special prosecutor may have turned up, as they are protected by grand-jury secrecy. New bits and pieces seem to surface almost daily.

Here is what we know so far:
Analysis
1988-1991 " Joseph Wilson serves as Deputy Chief of Mission in Baghdad , Iraq. In July 1990, he takes over as acting ambassador to Iraq . (Joseph Wilson, The Politics of Truth 451, 2004).

1992-1995 " Nominated by President George H.W. Bush, Wilson serves as Ambassador to the African nations of Gabon , as well as the smaller island country of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. (Wilson, Politics 451).

1995-1997 " Joseph Wilson serves as political adviser to the Commander in Chief of the U.S. Armed Forces in Europe, stationed in Germany . On a trip to Washington DC, Wilson meets Valerie Plame who at the time says she is an “energy executive living in Brussels. ” (Wilson, Politics 239-242).

June 1997 " Joseph Wilson returns to Washington DC as Senior Director for African Affairs at the National Security Council. At about the same time, Plame also moves back to the United States (Wilson, Politics 240), in part because the CIA suspects her name was leaked to the Russians in 1994. (Vanity Fair, Jan. ‘04).

April 3, 1998 " Wilson and Plame marry. (Wilson, Politics 276).

July 1998 " Joseph Wilson leaves government service to open a consulting firm specializing in assisting international investment in Africa. (Wilson, Politics 275).

1999 " Joseph Wilson takes a trip to Niger at the behest of the CIA to investigate “uranium-related matters” separate from Iraq (Wilson, Politics lv-lvi). According to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on pre-war intelligence, Wilson “was selected for the 1999 trip after his wife mentioned to her supervisors that her husband was planning a business trip to Niger in the near future and might be willing to use his contacts in the region.” (Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Report on Prewar Assessment of Iraq Intelligence, 39, July 2004).

April 22, 1999 " Valerie Wilson lists “Brewster-Jennings & Assoc.”"later revealed to be a CIA front company"as her employer when making a donation to the Gore campaign. (Gore FEC filing).

June 1999 " Niger ’s former prime minister Ibrahim Mayaki meets with an Iraqi delegation wanting to discuss “expanding commercial relations.” Mayaki interprets this as an interest in uranium, Niger ’s main export, and later tells Wilson that he did not discuss it because Iraq remained under UN trade sanctions. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 43-44, July 2004).

October 15, 2001 " US intelligence agencies become aware of reports from the Italian intelligence service of a supposed agreement between Iraq and Niger for the sale of uranium yellowcake. The State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research considers the report “highly suspect” because the French control Niger ’s uranium industry. The CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Department of Energy consider a uranium deal “possible.” (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 36, July 2004).

October 18, 2001 " The CIA writes a report titled, Iraq: Nuclear-Related Procurement Efforts. It quotes many of the Italian report’s claims, but adds that the report of a completed deal is not corroborated by any other sources. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 36-37, July 2004).

February 5, 2002 " The CIA’s Directorate of Operations " the clandestine branch that employed Valerie Wilson " issues a second report including “verbatim text” of an agreement, supposedly signed July 5-6, 2000 for the sale of 500 tons of uranium yellowcake per year. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 37, July 2004).

February 12, 2002 " The Defense Intelligence Agency writes a report concluding “Iraq is probably searching abroad for natural uranium to assist in its nuclear weapons program.” Vice President Cheney reads this report and asks for the CIA’s analysis. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 38-39, July 2004).

Responding to inquiries from Cheney’s office, the State Department, and the Defense Department, the CIA’s Directorate of Operations’ Counterproliferation Division (CPD) look for more information. They consider having Wilson return to Niger to investigate. In the process, Valerie Wilson writes a memo to a superior saying, “My husband has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity.” One of Valerie Wilson’s colleagues later tells Senate investigators she “offered up his name” for the trip. Wilson says that her agency made the decision and she only later approached her husband on the CIA’s behalf. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 39, July 2004).

February 19, 2002 " Joseph Wilson meets with officials from CIA and the State Department. According to a State Department intelligence analyst’s notes, the meeting was convened by Valerie Wilson. She later testifies that she left the meeting after introducing her husband. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 40, July 2004).

February 26, 2002 " Wilson arrives in Niger . He concludes, after a few days of interviews, that “it was highly unlikely that anything was going on.” (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 42, July 2004).

March 5, 2002 "Wilson reports back to two CIA officers at his home. Valerie Wilson is present but does not participate. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 43, July 2004).

March 8-9, 2002 " An intelligence report of Wilson ’s trip is sent through routine channels, identifying Wilson only as “a contact with excellent access who does not have an established reporting record.” (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 43-44, July 2004). The CIA grades Wilson’s information as “good,” the middle of five possible grades. Cheney is not directly briefed about the report. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 46, July 2004).

September 24, 2002 " The British government issues a public dossier saying, “[T]here is intelligence that Iraq has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa .” ( British Govt. Report 25, Sept. 2002). The Washington Post reports later that the CIA tried unsuccessfully to get the British to omit these claims. ("Bush, Rice blame CIA,” July 2003).

October 1, 2002 " The National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) " a summary of intelligence assessments for policymakers " says “a foreign government service” reported that Niger planned to send several tons of "pure uranium" to Iraq , possibly up to 500 tons a year. “We do not know the status of this arrangement,” the NIE says, according to a later declassified version released by the White House. In the NIE, State Department intelligence officials caution that African uranium claims are “highly dubious.” (Background WMD Briefing by Senior Administration Official).

January 28, 2003 " Bush’s State of the Union Address includes this 16-word sentence: “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” (Transcript of “ State of the Union").

March 7, 2003 " The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) " the international body that monitors nuclear proliferation " tells the UN Security Council that, after a “thorough analysis” with “concurrence of outside experts,” that the Italian documents" “which formed the basis for the reports of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger"are in fact not authentic.” (Status of Nuclear Inspections in Iraq..., March 2003).

March 19, 2003 " President Bush announces the start of the Iraq war in a televised address, saying it is “to disarm Iraq , to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.” (Bush, “ Addresses the Nation").

Spring 2003 "Valerie Wilson is in the process of moving from non-official to official, State Department cover, according to a later Vanity Fair article based on interviews with the Wilsons. ( Vanity Fair, January 2004).

May 2003 " Joseph Wilson begins advising the Kerry campaign on foreign policy issues. (White House expects calls…,” USA Today, October 2003).

May 6, 2003 " A New York Times columnist writes the first account of Wilson' s trip, but not naming him: “I'm told by a person involved in the Niger caper that more than a year ago the vice president's office asked for an investigation of the uranium deal, so a former U.S. ambassador to Africa was dispatched to Niger. In February 2002, according to someone present at the meetings, that envoy reported to the C.I.A. and State Department that the information was unequivocally wrong.” ("Missing In Action: Truth, ” New York Times, Op-ed, May 2003).

May 29, 2003 " Vice President Cheney’s chief of staff I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby allegedly requests information from Under Secretary of State Marc Grossman regarding the ambassador’s trip to Niger . The State Department provides Libby with a report on the trip and Libby is told for the first time that the ambassador is Wilson , according to a federal indictment of Libby later released by the Office of the Special Counsel, in October 2005. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

June 2003 " State Department intelligence officials reportedly prepare a memo on the Niger affair mentioning Wilson ’s trip to Niger and Valerie Wilson’s role in selecting her husband for the mission. The exact date is uncertain. The memo identifies Valerie Wilson but not her status as a covert agent, and it does not use her maiden name Valerie Plame. According to one account, the memo was classified and the paragraph containing information about Valerie Wilson was marked with “(S)” to indicate that the information was classified at the “secret” level. The CIA applies this level of classification to the identities of covert officers, according to the Washington Post. (“State Dept. memo gets scrutiny…,” New York Times, July 16, 2005; “Probe Centers on Rove, Memo, Phone Calls,” Bloomberg.com, July 18, 2005; “Plame’s Identity Marked as Secret,” Washington Post, July 21, 2005).

June 9, 2003 " Documents from the CIA allegedly are faxed to the office of the Vice President, and are addressed to Libby. They document Wilson ’s trip to Niger, without mentioning Wilson by name. The documents are marked as classified, and on them Libby and somebody else in his office writes the names “Wilson” and “Joe Wilson” on the documents. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

June 11, 2003- Libby allegedly speaks with a “senior CIA officer” about Wilson ’s trip and his wife. The officer confirms that Wilson ’s wife was employed by the CIA and was believed to have been involved in planning the trip. Grossman also speaks with Libby, allegedly advising him that Wilson ’s wife did work at the CIA and that State Department personnel were saying that she played a part in organizing Wilson ’s trip to Niger. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice , United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

June 12, 2003 " A Washington Post article quotes an “envoy” (Wilson ) as saying that the “dates were wrong and the names were wrong” on the Italian document determined to be forged by the IAEA. ("CIA Did Not Share Doubt…, ” Washington Post, June 2003). Wilson later tells the Senate Intelligence Committee that he may have “misspoken” to reporters, thinking he had seen the documents himself, rather than reading about them secondhand. (Senate Intelligence Cmte., Iraq 44).

June 19, 2003 " The New Republic publishes “The Selling of the Iraq War: the First Casualty”. The article mentions an unnamed ambassador (Wilson) was sent to Niger per the request of the Vice President’s office delivered via the CIA. The article quotes the unnamed ambassador as saying the administration “knew the Niger story was a flat-out lie.” The article also accuses the administration of suppressing dissent from the intelligence community regarding pre-war intelligence. (Judis, John B. and Spencer Ackerman, “ The Selling of the Iraq War: the First Casualty .” The New Republic. 30 June 2003).

After the story is published, Libby allegedly speaks with his principal deputy on the phone and says that public disclosure of information rebutting the article’s claim that the Vice President sent Wilson could cause problems at the CIA. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice , United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

June 23, 2003 " Times reporter Miller interviews Libby regarding Wilson ’s “activities.” She says later that during the interview Libby “placed blame for intelligence failures on the CIA.,” accusing them of “selective leaking.” Libby also mentions Wilson ’s wife to Miller for the first time. (Miller, Judith. “My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room,” The New York Times. 16 October 2005).

July 6, 2003 " Wilson publishes " What I didn’t find in Africa" in The New York Times, identifying himself for the first time as the unnamed “envoy.” He writes, “I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraq 's nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.” Wilson does not mention that he learned there was a possibility Iraq had sought uranium during a 1999 trade meeting with Niger ’s former Prime Minister.

Contrary to later statements by White House officials, Wilson does not claim that Cheney sent him on the Niger trip, only that he was sent to answer questions from Cheney’s “office.” He also doesn’t claim that Cheney was told of his findings, only that it would be “standard operating procedure” for the CIA to brief Cheney’s office on the results of his mission. (Wilson, "What I didn’t find, New York Times July 6, 2003).

July 7, 2003 "Secretary of State Colin Powell, aboard Air Force One, reportedly receives a copy of the State Department memo prepared in June about the purported Niger-Iraq uranium deal, which mentions Valerie Wilson’s role in her husband’s trip, according to later media reports. ("State Dept. memo gets scrutiny…" New York Times , July 2005; " Memo Underscored … Shielding Plame’s Identity,” Wall Street Journal , July 2005; "Memo Eyed in CIA Leak Probe,” AP, July 2005).

Libby speaks with White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer and allegedly tells him that Wilson ’s wife works for the CIA. He notes that the information is not widely known. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice , United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005.)

July 7, 2003 " White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer retracts the 16-word yellowcake claim from the State of the Union address, calling the President's statement “incorrect.” ( White House Press Gaggle, July 7 2003) .

July 8, 2003 " Columnist Robert Novak calls senior White House adviser Karl Rove, according to subsequent media accounts. Novak tells Rove he had heard that Joseph Wilson’s wife, who worked for the CIA, played a role in Joseph Wilson’s trip to Niger. Rove confirms the story to Novak without mentioning Valerie Wilson’s name or covert status, saying “I heard that, too.” (Rove ... Talk on C.I.A. Officer, NY Times, July 2003). Novak will later write that he originally acquired the information from an official who is “no partisan gunslinger.” Novak says, “When I called another official for confirmation, he said: ‘Oh, you know about it.’” (Novak, " CIA Leak" Chicago Sun-Times, Oct 2003).

Miller speaks with Libby for the second time. In both this interview and the interview on July 12, 2003 Miller claims that Libby “played down the importance of Mr. Wilson's mission and questioned his performance.” (Miller, Judith “ My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room,” The New York Times. 16 October 2005.) On the same day, Libby allegedly met with the Counsel to the Vice President David S. Addington and asked what paperwork the CIA would have if an employee’s spouse traveled overseas. Libby was also advised by the Assistant to the Vice President for Public Affairs Catherine Martin, who had spoken with “another government official,” that Wilson ’s wife worked for the CIA. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

July 11, 2003 "Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper calls Rove, who cautions him to be careful of Wilson ’s story, “‘Don't get too far out on Wilson ,’ he told me,” Cooper later writes. Rove tells Cooper that Wilson ’s wife works for the CIA on “WMD” (Weapons of Mass Destruction) and that it was she, not Cheney or the CIA’s director, who was “responsible” for sending Wilson to Africa. “Rove never used her name...indeed, I did not learn her name until the following week,” Cooper later recalls adding, “Rove never once indicated to me that she had any kind of covert status." Cooper says Rove ends the call saying “I've already said too much.”

Cooper also says he had talked earlier to Cheney’s Chief of Staff, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, about the story. “I asked Libby if he had heard anything about Wilson 's wife sending her husband to Niger. Libby replied, ‘Yeah, I've heard that too,’ or words to that effect. Like Rove, Libby never used Valerie Plame's name or indicated that her status was covert.” (Matthew Cooper, "What I told the Grand Jury,” Time, July 2005).

Around the same time, Libby allegedly speaks with a White House senior official - referred to as “Official A” in the indictment. That official is widely reported to be Rove. The official allegedly tells Libby that earlier that week he had a conversation with Novak and that they had discussed Wilson ’s wife, her employment at the CIA and her involvement in Wilson’s trip to Niger. The official also advises Libby that Novak will be writing a story about Wilson ’s wife. (“Rove’s Future Role is Debated,” The Washington Post. 3 November 2005.; Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

July 11, 2003 " Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet concedes in a statement that the State of the Union claims about Iraqi attempts to buy uranium from Africa were a mistake and that the “16 words should never have been included in the text written for the President.” (Tenet Statement, July 2003).

July 12, 2003 " Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus is told by an administration official that that White House had ignored Joseph Wilson’s 2002 trip to Niger because it was a “boondoggle” set up by his wife. ("Anonymous Sources,” Nieman Reports 27, Summer 2005). Pincus did not report his conversation because, as he would later describe, “Plame's name was never mentioned and the purpose of the disclosure did not appear to be to generate an article, but rather to undermine Wilson 's report.” ("Probe Focuses on Month Before Leak,” Washington Post, October 2003).

Libby flies with the Vice President and others to Norfolk , Virginia and back. The Vice President allegedly advises Libby that Wilson ’s wife works for the CIA, information Libby understands the Vice President received from the CIA. Libby speaks by telephone with Matthew Cooper about Wilson ’s wife and confirms for Cooper that he was aware of her involvement in sending Wilson to Niger . Later that day Libby discusses Wilson ’s wife and her work for the CIA with Judith Miller of the New York Times. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice , United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

July 14, 2003 " Robert Novak’s " Mission to Niger" column is published. This is the first published mention of Joseph Wilson’s wife’s name, her employment at the CIA, and her role in his trip to Niger. In the sixth of ten paragraphs, Novak writes, “Wilson never worked for the CIA, but his wife, Valerie Plame, is an Agency operative on weapons of mass destruction. Two senior administration officials told me Wilson 's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him.” The column does not describe her as a covert agent, then, but it does name her as “Valerie Plame” " her maiden and cover name. Novak gives conflicting accounts of whether Mrs. Wilson instigated her husband’s trip or was asked by others to do so. (Novak, "The Mission to Niger,” Chicago Sun-Times, July 2003).

July 14-17, 2003 " Newsday’s Washington bureau chief, Timothy Phelps, tells Joseph Wilson “that he had heard from the CIA that what Novak reported vis-à-vis Valerie’s employment was not incorrect,” according to Wilson’s memoir. “I declined to be drawn into a confirmation even then,” Wilson would later recall. ( Wilson, Politics 348).

July 16, 2003 " Wilson speaks about his conversation about Novak’s column with David Corn, Washington bureau chief for the liberal magazine The Nation. According to what Corn writes on his blog at thenation.com, Wilson says, “Naming her this way would have compromised every operation, every relationship, every network with which she had been associated in her entire career.” Corn says Wilson is still “known to friends as an energy analyst for a private firm.” ("A White House Smear,” The Nation, July 2003; Wilson, Politics, 349 ). Corn's entry is the first instance where someone alleges publicly that the release of Valerie Plame’s name disclosed the identity of a covert agent.

July 17, 2003 " Time publishes online “A War on Wilson?” by Cooper and others, the first time Time names Mrs. Wilson. Cooper quotes, “government officials” as saying “that Wilson 's wife, Valerie Plame, is a CIA official who monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. These officials have suggested that she was involved in her husband's being dispatched Niger [sic] to investigate reports that Saddam Hussein's government had sought to purchase large quantities of uranium ore.” (Matt Cooper, "A War on Wilson?,” Time, July 2003).

July 22, 2003 " In an article headlined “Columnist Blows CIA Agent's Cover,” Newsday publishes a story as saying, based in part on Wilson ’s assertions, that senior administration officials “violated the law and may have endangered her (Mrs. Wilson’s) career and possibly the lives of her contacts in foreign countries.” The newspaper says Wilson wouldn’t confirm that his wife was a covert agent. (“Columnist Blows CIA Agent's Cover,” Newsday, July 2003).

July 30, 2003 " The CIA sends a letter to the Criminal Division of the Justice Department noting “a possible violation of criminal law concerning the unauthorized disclosure of classified information,” according to a letter from the CIA’s Director of Congressional Affairs. (CIA, Letter to John Conyers).

August 21, 2003 " Wilson, speaking at a public panel discussion, said he was interested in seeing Karl Rove “frog-marched out of the White House in handcuffs” after hearing from reporters that Rove had called his wife “fair game.” (Wilson, Politics 372-4; 351).

September 16, 2003 " The CIA sends another letter to Justice requesting that the FBI undertake a criminal investigation. (Wilson, Politics 359).

September 16, 2003 " White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan dismisses the idea that Karl Rove was Novak’s anonymous source as “totally ridiculous." (White House Press Briefing, Sept. 16, 2003).

September 26, 2003 " The Department of Justice authorizes the FBI to investigate the unauthorized disclosure of Valerie Wilson’s name. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

September 29, 2003 " McClellan says he has spoken to Rove, denies that Rove was involved in the leak, and says, “If anyone in this administration was involved in it [the leak], they would no longer be in this administration.” (White House Press Briefing, Sept. 29, 2003). In a letter sent to Representative John Conyers on January 30, 2004 , the CIA will confirm that its Counterespionage Section has asked the FBI to initiate an investigation. (Letter to Rep. John Conyers from the CIA).

September 30, 2003 " The Justice department publicly announces an official criminal investigation. Commenting, Bush says, “And if there is a leak out of my administration, I want to know who it is. And if the person has violated law, the person will be taken care of.” ("President discusses job creation,” U. of Chicago , Sept. 30, 2003).

September 30, 2003 " Wilson endorses Senator John Kerry for president. (“Man … With an Independent Streak,” Washington Post, October 1, 2003 ).

October 14, 2003 " Libby is interviewed by FBI special agents on this day and on November 26, 2003. He allegedly tells them that he received information on Valerie Plame from NBC’s Tim Russert and that he did not recall having learned about her from the Vice President. Libby also says he did not discuss Wilson ’s wife with Judith Miller and that he told Matthew Cooper that reporters were telling the administration that Wilson ’s wife worked for the CIA but that he did not know if it was true. Libby is later indicted and charged on two counts of false statements and one count of obstruction of justice based on these comments to the FBI. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice , United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

December 30, 2003 " Facing allegations of bias, Attorney General Ashcroft recuses himself from the investigation and U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald takes over the investigation as a special prosecutor. ("Ashcroft Recuses Self …” Washington Post, 31 December 2003).

Janurary 2004 " The grand jury investigation starts. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

March 5, 2004 " Libby testifies before the grand jury. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice, United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

March 24, 2004 " Libby testifies before the grand jury a second time. (Fitzgerald, Patrick J., Department of Justice , United States of America v. I. Lewis Libby. 28 October 2005).

May 21, 2004 " Time's Cooper is subpoenaed for the grand jury investigation. Time says it will fight the subpoenas. ("Reporters Subpoenaed …" Wash. Post, May 2004).

June 10, 2004 " Bush is asked by a reporter, “[D]o you stand by your pledge to fire anyone found to have [who leaked the agent's name]?” Bush replies, “Yes. And that's up to the U.S. Attorney to find the facts.” (President Bush Press Conference Following G-8 Summit, Savannah, GA, June 10, 2004).

June 24, 2004 " Prosecutors question President Bush, who is not under oath, in the Oval Office for over an hour. ("Bush Interviewed…” Washington Post, June 25, 2004).

August 12, 2004 "Times reporter Miller, who did not write a story identifying Valerie Wilson, is subpoenaed by the grand jury. ("NY Times reporter subpoenaed… ” AP, Aug. 2004).

October 15, 2004 " Rove testifies before a federal grand jury for two hours. Fitzgerald assures Rove that he is not a target of the probe. (" Rove Testifies … ” Washington Post, Oct. 2004).

November 2, 2004 " Bush wins re-election.

June 27, 2005 " The Supreme Court declines to hear the appeal of Judith Miller of The New York Times and Cooper of Time, leaving standing a lower court’s ruling that they must testify to a federal grand jury. ("Reporters Lose … ” Washington Post, June 28, 2005).

July 1, 2005 " Over Cooper’s objections, Time Inc. turns over subpoenaed material. Time managing editor Norm Pearlstine tells CNN that journalists “regularly point a finger at people who think they're above the law,” and “I'm not comfortable being one of them myself.” ("Time Magazine ...” CNN.com, June 30, 2005 ).

July 6, 2005 " Miller, still refusing to testify before the grand jury, is jailed for contempt of court. ("’Time’ Reporter to Testify …” USAToday.com, July 6, 2005). Cooper says he receives last-minute permission from his confidential source, Karl Rove, to testify. (Matthew Cooper, " What I told the Grand Jury,” Time, July 2005).

July 18, 2005 " Bush " easing off his earlier statement to fire anyone who leaked " says “if someone committed a crime, they will no longer work in my administration.” (Bush Press Conference with Prime Minister of India, July 18, 2005). His press secretary Scott McClellan declines to say whether a firing would be triggered by an indictment or would require a conviction. (White House Press Briefing, July 18, 2005).

September 30, 2005 " Judith Miller testifies before the grand jury. (Miller, Judith. “ My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room,” The New York Times. 16 October 2005).

October 12, 2005 - Judith Miller testifies before the grand jury a second time. (Miller, Judith. “My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room,” The New York Times. 16 October 2005).

October 16, 2005 " Judith Miller writes the New York Times article, “My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room” where she outlines the events of the case as they concerned her. (Miller, Judith. “My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room ,” The New York Times. 16 October 2005).

October 31, 2005 " Libby is indicted on five counts: one count of obstruction of justice, two counts of making
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 26 Jun, 2009 01:24 am
Even Obama, the Messiah, did not back Plame.

Note:

Plame v. Cheney#Appeal
The Wilsons have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their appeal of the U.S. Court of Appeals ruling. On May 20, 2009, the Justice Department, in a brief filed by Solicitor General Elena Kagan, Assistant Attorney General Tony West, and Justice Department attorneys Mark B. Stern and Charles W. Scarborough, took the position that, "The decision of the court of appeals is correct and does not conflict with any decision of this Court or any other court of appeals,...Further review is unwarranted." Melanie Sloan, an attorney for the Wilsons and the executive director of the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, released a statement that read, "We are deeply disappointed that the Obama administration has failed to recognize the grievous harm top Bush White House officials inflicted on Joe and Valerie Wilson...The government's position cannot be reconciled with President Obama's oft-stated commitment to once again make government officials accountable for their actions."[31]

According to the brief filed by the Justice Department:

"Petitioners allege that Novak's July 14, 2003 column publicly disclosed Ms. Wilson's covert CIA employment and that that disclosure 'destroyed her cover as a classified CIA employee.' Petitioners, however, allege that Novak's source was Armitage, and do not allege that any of the three defendants against whom Mr. Wilson presses his First Amendment claim-Cheney, Rove, and Libby-caused that column to be published. In the absence of factual allegations that Mr. Wilson's alleged injury from the public disclosure of his wife's CIA employment is 'fairly traceable' to alleged conduct by Cheney, Rove, or Libby, petitioners have failed to establish Article III jurisdiction over Mr. Wilson's First Amendment claim
0 Replies
 
genoves
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 26 Jun, 2009 01:25 am
From--- "Who is Lying about Iraq" by Norman Podhoretz

Note:

Libby stands accused of making false statements to the FBI and of committing perjury in testifying before a grand jury that had been convened to find out who in the Bush administration had “outed” Valerie Plame, a CIA agent married to the retired ambassador Joseph C. Wilson, IV. The supposed purpose of leaking this classified information to the press was to retaliate against Wilson for having “debunked” (in his words) “the lies that led to war.”

Now, as it happens, Libby was not charged with having outed Plame but only with having lied about when and from whom he first learned that she worked for the CIA. Moreover, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor who brought the indictment against him, made a point of emphasizing that


[t]his indictment is not about the war. This indictment is not about the propriety of the war. And people who believe fervently in the war effort, people who oppose it, people who have mixed feelings about it should not look to this indictment for any resolution of how they feel or any vindication of how they feel.

This is simply an indictment that says, in a national-security investigation about the compromise of a CIA officer’s identity that may have taken place in the context of a very heated debate over the war, whether some person"a person, Mr. Libby"lied or not.
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  2  
Reply Fri 26 Jun, 2009 08:17 am
How can anyone with a straight face say that those outing a CIA secret agent did not break any laws? Had Obama done this, the Reps would be advancing on the White House with pitchforks and torches.
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Jun, 2009 08:22 am
@Advocate,
You need to ask Mr. Fitzgerald that.
He was the one that said there were no laws broken, and he was the person charged with heading the investigation.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Jun, 2009 09:31 am
@mysteryman,
Fitzgerald didn't say "no laws were broken". He said his investigation was hampered by lying.
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 26 Jun, 2009 10:48 am
@parados,
Then why was the only indictment for lying about something that wasnt a crime?

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 6.64 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 05:44:08