https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2021/09/04/texas-abortion-law-becomes-a-gop-24-litmus-test-494207
A SPLIT IN BIDENLAND? — For months, the Biden White House has been effective at staying on message and preempting leaks about internal rancor. One notable exception flared up Friday, as WaPo’s Jeff Stein reported on the frustrations brewing throughout the administration over the upcoming unemployment benefits cliff — and what, according to Stein, many staffers see as President JOE BIDEN’s unwillingness to do anything about it.
Where we’re at: On Monday, roughly 10 million Americans will lose at least some unemployment benefits — including 7 million who will lose all benefits. That’s because the federal bump in state unemployment benefits will lapse, a decision made earlier this year, when Sen. JOE MANCHIN (D-W.Va.) announced his opposition to extending the boosted UI benefits past Labor Day. And the White House isn’t budging from that timeline.
All of it is feeding growing frustration at Biden, both within his own administration and among outside allies: There’s a cavalcade of voices in the story who are critical of Biden’s decision on this, ranging from the AFL-CIO to Dem-aligned think tanks (“This is the biggest benefits cliff in American history,” says JUDY CONTI of the National Employment Law Project) to progressive elected officials like Rep. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D-N.Y.).
— The politics of it all has the makings of another split where Biden is siding with Manchin over progressives — right as those two sides are fighting about the size and scope of the reconciliation package and timing of the bipartisan infrastructure bill. Speaking of which …
BUDGET BEEF — The fight between moderates and, well, every other Democrat in the House over the size, scope and timing of the reconciliation package is getting tougher. Reps. STEPHANIE MURPHY (D-Fla.) and HENRY CUELLAR (D-Texas) are out with three big demands, as our Nicholas Wu reports:
— They want the budget bill to be “pre-conferenced” with the upper chamber, calling that a prerequisite to “obtain our support.”
— They want the bill to be fully paid for (with the exception of its climate provisions).
— And they want members to be given at least 72 hours to review the legislation before it comes to the House floor.
Asked whether the 72-hour provision would mess up the timeline for advancing both bills, Murphy said that’s up to her progressive colleagues, who she hopes “will act responsibly when the transportation bill comes to the floor. It is a much-needed investment in America’s infrastructure, and one would hope they would vote to make this needed investment.”
Something else to keep an eye on: Remember when moderates received a Sept. 27 deadline for a vote on the BIF? Well, the House isn’t scheduled to come back until seven days before that deadline — giving them a small window to ensure the two-track plan stays … on track. Add the 72-hour requirement, and it becomes even more difficult.