The “prerequisite” of application of logic , touchy and feely:
Piggy talked about the 4 – off logic in the category of “consciousness” with the case of energy conservation ︱△U ︱=︱△Ek︱. In that case, we could consider that︱△U ︱is ︱△Ek︱or ︱△Ek︱is ︱△U ︱, because the internal energy E (the SELF) was in control (the “prerequisite”). The “consciousness” is not the controlling element. So, no matter how people play (their game of consciousness), it would not cause trouble to the essence of nature.
But in the category of SELF and PRESENCE, “SELF with the assistance of PRESENCE is meant to take overall CONTROL”. The “prerequisite” is different. If people play their SELF in this category, what will happen?
Male rabbit is female rabbit;
Female rabbit is male rabbit.
How lame it all sounds. Perhaps only Dandan can do that. Bounce…
Another relevant example in physics is the “the twins’ paradox (in consciousness)” piggy mentioned ahead.
“The fun thing is that such paradox in consciousness is also reasonable. But fortunately, it’s not the controlling element. Haha”
“If you are willing to enter the era of SELF, such paradox automatically disappear”.
(Piggy will talk about this question in details in the physics thread in another appropriate time.)
The question is in the era of subconsciousness, while the answer is in the era of SELF. How can those “prisoner of consciousness” find a way out? The fact is that they argue endlessly there over this “why”. They need to be AWARE.
The positive spirit should be: solved this “why” and advance to the next “why”, although perhaps “at the end of the tail…”
May 15 , 2021