3
   

Teacher vs Researcher

 
 
Fri 5 Mar, 2021 06:35 pm
The job of a teacher is to lecture according to the current textbook;
The job of a researcher is to explore new things beyond the current textbook;
A fun guy might be both a teacher and a researcher.
The fun thing is that the fun guy might get latest achievement in his research which might have surpassed the old content in the current textbook. But as a teacher, the fun guy has to talk to the students according to the old content of the current textbook as before. In philosophy, the fun guy is lying to the students.
The question here is:
How can the fun guy adjust his SELF consciousness to be both a good teacher as well as a good researcher?

Have a lovely day, guys. haha
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 45,149 • Replies: 960
Topic Closed

 
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Fri 5 Mar, 2021 08:11 pm
@htam9876,
https://miro.medium.com/max/1838/1*vJRnFMr4cmklwOUftneAsg.jpeg

Is this what you have in mind?
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  0  
Fri 5 Mar, 2021 09:02 pm
@htam9876,
I taught Physics to high school students and undergraduate non-science majors.

High school students don't have the base knowledge to understand modern physics. It is simply impossible. You can't have any real understanding of even basic classical Physics or chemistry without understanding calculus.

And yet we teach high school kids how to use Newton's laws to make predictions. They can then do the experiments themselves and check the actual measurements. These kids are taking the very first steps towards understanding how Physics works, and they are learning to confirm theory with experiment.

However we do the calculus for them. We give the students the equation D = V0t * 0.5at^2. But we don't explain that this is a derivative because they haven't developed the mathematical skills yet to understand what a derivative is. I had some very smart high school students come and ask where that equation came from... and I explained it. They will get a deeper understanding when they work through the mathematics for themselves.

When you are thinking about education you are thinking about the needs of the student for their current level of knowledge.

This doesn't count as lying.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Sat 6 Mar, 2021 02:17 am
@htam9876,
The only way he can do it is if he introduces awareness into the equation.Turn the awareness dimmer switch up so all are clear no matter what stage they are at.

At a philosophical level one can become AWARE of the see saw consciousness shift from static to active and vice versa.MIND MOVEMENT.

Awareness sits above consciousness.


Jasper10
 
  -1  
Sat 6 Mar, 2021 02:36 am
@Jasper10,
Awareness has been separated from consciousness.
htam9876
 
  2  
Sun 7 Mar, 2021 05:32 pm
@maxdancona,
“When you are thinking about education you are thinking about the needs of the student for their current level of knowledge.
This doesn't count as lying.”
Oh dear, at least with this decent excuse, the fun guy can keep his salary and avoid being kicked in the *ss by the headmaster. And satisfy himself.
htam9876
 
  2  
Sun 7 Mar, 2021 05:35 pm
@Jasper10,
Isn’t “awareness” and “consciousness” the same meaning in English? SELF?
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Sun 7 Mar, 2021 05:45 pm
@htam9876,
Is piggy saying that education equals lying?

I think this is a very silly piggy.
0 Replies
 
maxdancona
 
  -1  
Sun 7 Mar, 2021 05:57 pm
The problem with these Anti-Science and Anti-Education posts is that education is demonstrably successful.

NASA just landed another robot on Mars, this time with with helicopter. This is an incredible feat that combines multiple branches of science and mathematics; Physics, chemistry, electronics, Quantum Mechanics, computer science... these all go into a task that involves controlling a little autonomous rover that is light minutes away.

The NASA scientists all started learning about Newton's laws and the planetary atom... just like the rest of us. And now they are at the top of their field doing pretty amazing things. They are pushing the boundaries of human knowledge. If these are lies, then they are awfully productive lies.

Piggy wants to take a short cut. Gaining knowledge is hard work, in science and mathematics this means university study. You need to learn the current state of knowledge before you can proceed. People who have spent the time time studying mathematics, doing problem sets, listening to lectures... this is how you do it.

Students need teachers. Someone who hates education will never master a subject.
Jasper10
 
  0  
Mon 8 Mar, 2021 01:28 am
@htam9876,
Yes the present understanding is that they are the same but they are not.Awareness and Consciousnesses are different.Self is aware of consciousness types and can alter them.i.e. a controlling element is present that can alter a state from -ve to +ve or off to on.
htam9876
 
  1  
Mon 8 Mar, 2021 05:17 pm
@maxdancona,
Oh dear, seems that you have much more time to consume than piggy. Seems that you are getting off topic. Piggy doesn’t know what you are trying to argue…
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Mon 8 Mar, 2021 05:29 pm
@Jasper10,
Could we say that the fun guy “see” → aware that he is a teacher; “saw” → conscious he is a researcher...SELF? Just like a shuttle of NASA, MOVES in different directions…SELF.
Jasper10
 
  0  
Tue 9 Mar, 2021 04:49 am
@htam9876,
As the fun guy becomes more aware of something (researcher).He can then share (teach) that knowledge. The fun guy comes into an understanding of an idea/theory and then tests that theory before he shares the information. All can agree with that theory or not.The idea/theory that SELF is a consciousness type is wrong. The idea/theory that SELF is awareness is also wrong. SELF is the controlling element and has awareness of consciousness types and can shift between the 2 consciousness types (manual/autopilot). Initially,there is mind movement from one consciousness type to the other. TOGGLING (on/off or +/-) within the mind as SELF experiences both in the moment/not in the moment consciousness. There are 2 off thought types inward/outward that exist within the consciousness types.
htam9876
 
  2  
Tue 9 Mar, 2021 06:58 pm
@Jasper10,
You are talking very profound philosophical principle.
Piggy has to moan it’s not easy for a man to cognize himself.
Piggy summarized your ideas:
SELF (controlling element) → Consciousness types → awareness → active
htam9876
 
  2  
Tue 9 Mar, 2021 11:01 pm
In the critical juncture of history, there are two types of consciousness:
One is positive and active. He might feel exciting, and becomes the promoting force of the development of history; Mark was an example;
Two is negative and conservative. He might feel scaring and turn into a crazy dog biting randomly, and only can become the obstacle; ** is an example;
Jasper10
 
  0  
Wed 10 Mar, 2021 01:48 am
@htam9876,
It is a profound philosophical principle that individuals can test for themselves. SELF needs to take (CONTROL) of consciousness states which consists of a COMBINATION of both in the moment and not in the moment consciousness types.When one tries to go to in the moment and stay there having put (ENERGY) in to be (ACTIVE) and experienced mind shift (MOVEMENT) initially one will not be able to remain in that state,one will automatically default back to the not in the moment state.One needs to reprogram the mind/rewire the brain by practice such that SELF can take more and more control..One needs to be AWARE of what SELF is trying to achieve.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  0  
Wed 10 Mar, 2021 02:06 am
@htam9876,
One needs to become more and more aware of the 2 consciousness types and the +ve/-ve influences (thought types) associated with them.

SELF is not those consciousness/thoughts types however SELF is separate from them but is AWARE of them.Both consciousness and thought types are on both sides of the fence that SELF toggles (back and forth from/to) hence the equation is balanced.SELF needs to try and STOP the toggling.
Jasper10
 
  0  
Wed 10 Mar, 2021 05:47 am
@Jasper10,
The toggling happens whether SELF is aware of it or not.
htam9876
 
  2  
Wed 10 Mar, 2021 07:24 pm
@Jasper10,
“SELF is not those consciousness/thoughts types”
No bad a comment.
………………………
Piggy just does my SELF!
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  2  
Wed 10 Mar, 2021 07:25 pm
Piggy awares something:
In last century, the exploration of science is in the “consciousness” category, while in this century, the exploration of science is advancing into the “SELF” category!
The issue about the contraction of space and inflation of time is an outstanding example. In the “consciousness” of last century, it is the velocity caused them. But piggy has illustrated in the thread “cosmos vs us” that actually, the controlling element should be the internal energy. And there are different types of “consciousness”: the gravitational, the static, etc…
Also, piggy has illustrated in the thread “cosmos vs us” that the gravitational potential and the kinematic energy essentially are the change of the internal energy. The gravitational potential and the kinematic energy are on different sides of the fence. They are “consciousness” types. And the internal energy could “toggle”.
Sciences are all interconnected. Bounce…
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Teacher vs Researcher
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 05:24:56