0
   

Teacher vs Researcher

 
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 18 May, 2021 02:25 pm
@htam9876,
Interesting...Science and Philosophy needs to test the theories put forward for their honesty.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 May, 2021 06:56 pm
@Jasper10,
Fun.
Yes, many math games in “the theories”. They need to be tested. Really.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 May, 2021 06:59 pm
Science vs Philosophy, touchy and feely:

Piggy just tested the so called “energy - momentum equation” with both Science and Philosophy in the thread of “SELF”. Now piggy repeated it here and talk a bit more.

Test by Science:
The so called energy - momentum equation E² = p²c² + (m0c²)² is actually a tricky math game and such representation as “for a massless particle, its energy E = pc” is just math game too, as piggy interpreted in the thread “How to understand the energy - momentum equation in a natural way” in the Relativity forum.
URL: https://able2know.org/topic/551152-1

Test by Philosophy:
Actually the so called energy - momentum equation E² = p²c² + (m0c²)² and the equation E = pc is non sense in philosophy: If E is internal energy (the SELF), why it must be associated with the movement (momentum p)?
SELF can be STILL on the FULCRUM.
Einstein’s original energy – mass equation can be STILL there E = m0c².
In piggy’s physical model, even for a released photon, its internal energy can be represented with the equation E = m0c². (For a released photon, the moving mass equals to the rest mass: m = m0. For details, see relevant chapters in the physics thread.)
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 May, 2021 07:03 pm
Science vs Philosophy 2, touchy and feely:

Once upon a time, we argued the equation “m0 → 0” in PHF:
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/wavicle-an-old-topic.15202/post-49945

Piggy’s humble opinion is as below:

In math we can consider that “m0” is just a mathematical symbol. We can carry out such mathematical operations as “m0 → ∞ ” or “m0 → 0”.

But in physics, for a certain particle, (if no other miscellaneous factors meddle in), m0 is an invariable.

Sounds that “m0 → 0” can represent such meaning in math: a series of particles with the rest masses ranging from “…,1kg,…,0.1kg,…,0.01kg,…,0.001kg,…,0.0001kg,…”.
But in physics:
If you want to describe the property of a proton, you can use the symbol m01;
If you want to describe the property of a electron, you can use the symbol m02;
If you want to describe the property of a newly discovered particle which has even smaller rest mass, you can use the symbol m03;
And so on.
But seems that using “m0 → 0” to represent a series of particles with different rest masses is inappropriate.

Perhaps in philosophy, we can understand it more explicitly: m0 is the SELF associated with the PRESENCE.

In order to help research what “m0 → 0” means exactly, hereby we need a model: well come a rabbit – shade balloon :
 https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/3/3401-ddbef88e0249bd9e24d1952c3fde04c1.jpg

The rabbit – shade balloon is very large with two valves on two sides. Then what’s “m0 → 0” for him in physics? Guys can imagine the valves open and the air inside “peeeeee…”…until he disappears in cosmos.
PRESENCE disappears and then SELF disappears too.
Of course, even nothing PRESENCE in this cosmos, people still can play math game.

Have a lovely day, guys. haha
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 May, 2021 11:02 pm
Once upon a time, we talked about the 2 – off logic in Newton’s absolute subconsciousness era (Space is absolute in different inertial frames. Long is long, short is short.) But even in Einstein’s relativistic subconsciousness era, such cognition seemed illusive.

Now piggy feels that if we talk about the 2 – off logic in the new era of SELF and PRESENCE, it comes to true.
Take a look at chirality of spiral spring:
 https://static.wixstatic.com/media/825b02_b6f3744f51a34f729d33c95c98f71b13~mv2.jpg
Left - handed is left- handed, right - handed is right- handed.

The chirality would not change in different inertial frames. This is a remarkable character different from the era of “relativistic consciousness” era.

So are the “interaction” of attraction or repulsion.

Once upon a time when we were in the category of consciousness, we could consider that ︱△U ︱is ︱△Ek︱or ︱△Ek︱is ︱△U ︱, because the internal energy E was in control.

Now, in the category of SELF and PRESENCE, we can’t do it in the same way in respect of chirality as well as interaction.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 May, 2021 11:36 pm
Sounds the 2 - off logic has two forms?

The absolute 2 - off logic: good is good, bad is bad;

The relativistic 2 - off logic: good is bad, bad is good.

Fun...
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 May, 2021 09:38 am
@htam9876,
We are in agreement then.......high five!!!!
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 May, 2021 06:30 pm
The solution of the rabbit game is as below:
Male rabbit A or B, either one turns around the female rabbit Dandan and forms a “two body” neutral thing.
Assume male rabbit A turns around the female rabbit Dandan, while male rabbit B on the left side of the “two body” neutral thing. When male rabbit A turns to the right side of Dandan, male rabbit B would be attracted by the female rabbit Dandan and come close. When male rabbit A turns to the left side of Dandan, male rabbit B would be kicked away by the male rabbit A. Bungee bungee…

Have a lovely day, guys. haha
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 27 May, 2021 11:31 am
@htam9876,
It’s important that SELF recognises the bungee bungee game...i.e. the bungee bungee mind game.....and tries to separate oneself from it.....The bungee bungee mind game always took place in the UNAWARENESS state /“prisoner of consciousness state” and even continues when SELF enters the new AWARENESS era.The difference being that SELF begins to notice the “toggling” more and more and starts to take CONTROL of it....STILL it....with the assistance of PRESENCE of course.....
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 May, 2021 12:15 am
@Jasper10,
This “bungee bungee” of rabbit game is not that “bungee bungee” of Dandan on the pendulum. Yes, we use that “bungee bungee” of Dandan on the pendulum to make an analogy of “prisoner of consciousness”.

Philosophy is similar to the bone frame of the pig. There is something else to supplement: the pork. The pork makes the PRESENCE of the pig richer.

Yes, we are different. SELF is AWARE and try to control the “core” (with a new synthetic neutron model).

This “bungee bungee” of rabbit game is to describe a specific physical phenomenon: vibration and balance. We can expect that the “core” can reach balance and also we can expect that there is magnetism in the “core” as you mentioned ahead. And such magnetism should be oscillating. It might have a fixed frequency for a certain “core”.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 May, 2021 12:57 am
@htam9876,
SELF is not the mind...SELF has a mind...

SELF is not consciousness (types)...SELF just experiences consciousness (types)

SELF is not thoughts...SELF just has thoughts or experiences thoughts......

SELF is not emotions..SELF just experiences emotions as a result of thoughts or information coming in from the five senses...

SELF is SEPARATE from the MIND..

Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 May, 2021 01:00 am
@Jasper10,
Our present understanding of the core is not complete.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 May, 2021 01:06 am
@Jasper10,
There must be magnetism at the core...
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Jun, 2021 01:39 pm
@Jasper10,
“Our present understanding of the core is not complete.”
Yes, of course. Piggy doesn’t think that any guy has ever seen the elephant. What physicists did was building model according to some experiments.

Sometimes piggy would rather talk something in philosophy. Really.
One thing is sure: if the so called “strong nuclear force” is true, then, the neutrons in the “core” would be redundant. Piggy believes in this simple logic.
Unfortunately, neutrons in the “core” is fact while the so called “strong nuclear force” is just theory.

The rabbit game can show why neutron (male rabbit A turns around the female rabbit Dandan, forms a “two body” neutral thing) is “inescapable” in the “core”.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jun, 2021 01:00 am
@htam9876,
Can SELF get trapped within a NEUTRON which has “toggling”charges?....interesting.....ummm...that correlates with philosophy.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jun, 2021 02:02 am
@Jasper10,
Is the whole of the universe within a NEUTRON?....wow!!! this is getting heavy...
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sat 5 Jun, 2021 06:24 pm
@Jasper10,
You use one general word “toggle” in philosophy, while piggy has to use “projection”, “vibration”, “oscillation”, etc, in different specific situation in physics.
Ummmm, piggy always says that the neutron and the “core” are specific issues of physics.
Of course, you can also consider the issue of “vibration and balance” in the “core” is an issue of philosophy. Bungee bungee…
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Jun, 2021 01:48 am
@htam9876,
Well if SELF is AWARE of both the FULCRUM and the SWINGING pendulum then SELF gains CONTROL.

We know now that SELF can’t gain control if one is just hanging onto the end of the swinging pendulum in an UNAWARE state.

My view is the NEUTRAL (NEUTRON) contains the BALANCED vibrations/oscillations within.

The constant projections/contractions are happening all the time within the universe (NEUTRON?)

Looks like the “Big Bang” is NOT the start of it all after all....not according to PRESENCE anyway.

The “Big Bang” is just HALF the story....
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Jun, 2021 02:09 pm
@Jasper10,
Piggy cares more about how to dig a hole under the fence and flee to America BEFORE the First Order decides to shout “execute” than what’s BEFORE the Big Bang.
…………………………………………………………
Cosmos can be fashion, passion and inflation, while physics must be step by step.
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 6 Jun, 2021 02:17 pm
Science vs Philosophy 3, touchy and feely:

Einstein’s SR had a limitation: when v = c, that theory will be in invalid. Why?
Pmb from PHF won No.5 position of the Pig Head Award just because he was AWARE of this problem.
“Using the principles of relativity one can derive the expression for the kinetic energy of, K, of a particle. As v -> c, K -> infinity. (Why the kinetic energy of a released photon is not infinite?) ”

At Einstein’s “era of relativistic subconsciousness”, people weren’t yet AWARE of the (effect of) PRESENCE and SELF.

As piggy illustrated in the physical model in the physics thread: the MATTER STATE of a released photon is different from other particles. Namely, the PRESENCE of a released photon is different from other particles. Then, of course the SELF of a released photon is different from other particles. Then, its “projection” in the dynamic physical environment is different too.
(The SELF of integrity of space – mass which reflected by the mass – space equation r ∝1/ M is not applicable to the released photon. For details, please see relevant chapters of the physics thread.)
A vivid analogy is the front view (or side view) of a pig is a bit different from that of a rabbit.
Philosophy demonstrates the principle explicitly.

Actually Einstein’s SR was lack of an element to reflect such a difference of the PRESENCE.
So, piggy has been contemplating 3 years ago to add in a MATTER STATE element to create the 4D space Gama factor, so that SR could be generally applicable. Of course, the philosophical principle of such an attempt is now very explicit: PRESENCE and SELF are in CONTROL.
 https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/3/3383-09e5b472ea1ee2f0a2c64a7766ae2806.jpg

Liqiang Chen
陈力强

June 7, 2021
No matter how much social resource they input, no matter how complicated / cruel their game would be, their only purpose is to play piggy down. That’s their iron law / rule, “the first law of cosmos” created by the First Order, which never changes. (Piggy would die hard in CN… absolute affair. I am sure.) But piggy trusts that history / science is ever developing.
给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代,全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/25/2021 at 03:32:59