3
   

Teacher vs Researcher

 
 
Leadfoot
 
  -1  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 07:05 am
Smooth one 'Joyce'!

izzythepush
 
  3  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 07:24 am
@Leadfoot,
They're a spammer. I have reported them.

For all you know their link could download a load of malware.
htam9876
 
  2  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 05:26 pm
Piggy hereby specially nominates izzythepush the honorable adviser of COISA.
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  0  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 06:49 pm
@izzythepush,
Yeah, I know, and 'Joyce' is probably an AI.

But you gotta admire how smooth she slipped it in.
Jasper10
 
  -3  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 11:14 pm
@Jasper10,
Htam9876,

As AWARENESS sits above consciousness and PRESENCE who is AWARE can control which consciousness state experienced, where does this fit into your scientific equations?

This isn’t delusional or illusional.This is a fact.

The point I am making is that SPECTATOR science cannot explain this.

In philosophy, SPECTATORS don’t exercise any control over consciousness, only PLAYERS do this.

You see science says we are no more than consciousness and yet there are two types of consciousness that PRESENCE experiences,AUTOPILOT and MANUAL.PRESENCE toggles between the two but can also control/determine which one is experienced in any given moment.

I haven’t made that up it is established in psychology.

You see, a scientific model has to relate to what is actually occurring across the sciences, it shouldn’t isolate itself to just one aspect of science.

I am not a troll or a bully htam9876 and I am sorry you think that I am.

With all due respect, you need to see things in a more broader sense.






0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  3  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 11:35 pm
These sections are a bit important. It concerns the safety of this cosmos. Piggy repeats it again.

Next, philosophical test again and again:
Assume a mad bull jump over the window,
1. It will turn into a “stinging insect” and MANUALly fly into the sky;
2. AUTOPILOTly go to hell and never come back;
3. AUTOPILOTly go to hell. Thereafter he “travel back in time” and see the First Order “shine like sun ray” in this cosmos.
(Note: this thought experiment is designed to demonstrate the difference between delusion / illusion and science.)

……………………………………………………….

Prisoner of logic 9, touchy and feely
The so called what “anti gravity” is also a misconceptions MISGUIDE by the + / - logic.

Piggy has no idea how to define gravity. One general “conception” of gravity is mass – mass interaction.
If that prisoner of logic wants a what “anti gravity”, the “conception” might be mass – negative mass interaction.
As analysis ahead shown, there is no negative mass in this cosmos. So, there is no so called what “anti gravity”.

Of course, a 神经病can ever DREAM to replace G* and design nature according his logic. But unfortunately, according to that fool’s logic, +/-, +/-…he never can walk 10 miles and reach the church to negotiate with G*... Oh Lord, what he can do in this world though? Trolling only? The most happy guys of course would be the First Order.

Of course, a mad bull can jump over the window and DREAM to fly into the sky too, if something happens, he can “travel back in time”, no danger. Piggy is puzzled: why that mad bull dares not to have a try? It’s a very simple experiment to do…
 https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/2/2163-dc109286560f62bafbadbe2df265c028.jpg

It PROVED that guy actually knows exactly which answer is correct and scientific! Perhaps “normal” scientific research / analysis is not mad bull’s purpose here. Mad bull’s obscure purpose is to bury this galaxy with the J – 10 style of “delusional squat”, so that the First Order can “win out” in this cosmos?

(Note: Piggy is not trying to “instruct” that NO SAVE fool, but to reiterate my stance: Oh Lord, SCIENCE SHOULD NOT BE MISGUIDED BY THAT FOOL’S PSYCHOLOGY INTO HIS CAGE OF LOGIC. Perhaps it’s not fool at all, but a very smart conspirator? Bounce…)
Cabals ever win!
htam9876
 
  3  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 11:41 pm
Prisoner of logic 10, touchy and feely
The so called what “equivalent quantity of anti matter in cosmos” is also a misconceptions MISGUIDE by the + / - logic.

Below is a previous post in the cosmic thread. Piggy moves it here for reference:
The mechanism of formation of matter vs the origin of cosmos, touchy and feely:

Once upon a time, piggy heard some people talked about the origin of cosmos on web: billions of years ago, “bang”…and high energy photons rushed out. Thereafter, each high energy photon decayed into a pair of positron and electron, etc. But actually, the fact we can see today is that there are much much much more electrons in this cosmos than positrons, etc. And then, those guys wonder where that equivalent quantity of anti matter gone? And then, they speculate this or that reason.

Piggy’s comment: that’s habitual thought, and then, inertial thought…why not change an angle of thinking? Why not doubt the root of that model?

Piggy’s humble opinion is as below:
Assume the bang boosted from a singularity;
The 3D space of singularity is zero, so it’s something without direction; (note: “without direction” doesn’t mean “round”. Even a small round ball is made up of many points. The important part of the word “singularity” is “singul”.)
But a straight line is something with two directions;
So, it’s inappropriate to think that photons at the very beginning of the bang rushed out straightly alike they do from the Sun to the Earth nowadays;
The spherical surface (simplified as a circle) is something without direction;
So, it’s appropriate to think that spherical electro – magnetic wave rushed out first at the very beginning of the bang;
Then, the most basic 3D space appeared in cosmos;
Thereafter, photons were able to travel in straight line, and illuminated the cosmos;

In this sense, if equivalent quantity of anti matter (particle) occurred at boost point of the bang, annihilation would have made the bang backward, but photons could not rush out straightly at boost point of the bang. That means the birth of cosmos could never happen.
So, actually, “no equivalent quantity of anti matter (particle)” is one of the prerequisite of the birth of cosmos.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  -3  
Mon 18 Apr, 2022 11:48 pm
@htam9876,
htam9876…you are arguing with the wrong person….AUTOPILOT and MANUAL consciousness states are established in psychology.

Are you saying that the AUTOPILOT and MANUAL concept of consciousness is wrong?

Your thinking/reasoning is “pigeon holed” htam9876.

You need to engage with the other sciences more….you might learn something.

You clearly have no control of your own consciousness states which is why you argue like you do.

0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  2  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 12:09 am
@Leadfoot,
I don't have to do anything, least of all admire a spammer.
Jasper10
 
  -3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 12:18 am
@izzythepush,
There is no “spamming” going on here…..Izzy….
htam9876
 
  3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 12:43 am
Assume a mad bull jump over the window,
1. It will turn into a “stinging insect” and MANUALly fly into the sky;
2. AUTOPILOTly go to hell and never come back;
3. AUTOPILOTly go to hell. Thereafter he “travel back in time” and see the First Order “shine like sun ray” in this cosmos.
(Note: this thought experiment is designed to demonstrate the difference between delusion / illusion and science.)
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 12:50 am
@Jasper10,
Yes there is. Which is why I reported it and the moderators removed it.

If it was not spam it would not have been removed.

Not everything is about you. You're not a spammer you're a tedious little tit with half baked theories nobody is interested in.
Jasper10
 
  -3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 12:58 am
@htam9876,
Htam9876….I am trying to help you here….I am not trolling…I am not a bully.

Your mental health is far more important than your calculations.

I offer sound advice.





Jasper10
 
  -2  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:01 am
@izzythepush,
That is just your opinion Izzy….you are clearly interested or you wouldn’t be reading it to be able to report it.

Be honest…you just don’t understand it.

Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t make it wrong Izzy……it just means YOU don’t understand it which is fair enough…spectator scientists don’t understand it either.

izzythepush
 
  4  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:03 am
@Jasper10,
Jasper10 wrote:

I offer sound advice.


You offer unwanted advice, time and time again htam has asked you to leave him alone.

You don't that makes it trolling and any advice you give has been damaged by its association with you, and is coming more harm than good.

If you really care about htam's metal health you should leave him alone.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:08 am
@Jasper10,
I'm not a scientist. I don't claim to be one. I'm interested in trying to decipher your nonsense.

I am smart enough to recognise expert knowledge from scientists.

None of the scientists on A2K consider you to know.

And you know what to do, submit a paper.

You won't do that because you know real scientists would laugh your idiotic notions out of court.

So you come here spouting your delusional nonsense to people who aren't interested because you have no life.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:12 am
@izzythepush,
This is a debating forum Izzy?

What is your problem?

Get a life…

I am not deluded….speak for yourself …



0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:15 am
@Jasper10,
Look at it like this. Has anybody ever said, thank you for helping them, or have they said you make them smile or laugh?

Or do you just hijack other people's threads to force your own half baked theories on them without concern for what they might actually want or need?

Jasper10
 
  -1  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:17 am
@izzythepush,
How come you have become so passionate for other peoples well being all of a sudden?

I have have more compassion for htam9876 than you will ever know Izzy.

izzythepush
 
  3  
Tue 19 Apr, 2022 01:24 am
@Jasper10,
Which is why htam has asked you to leave him alone yet has exchanged email addresses with me.

People often pm me asking for advice or help, and I often get told that I have made someone laugh either by something I've said or comedy skits I've posted.

You wouldn't have noticed because you're a narcissist who thinks everything is about them.
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 07/02/2022 at 01:51:00