Teacher vs Researcher

“a prisoner of his own consciousness”
Excellent new term it is. We do need such kind of creative points in the research. haha

Piggy is reluctant to advocate what illusive “scientific revolution” as Sievrikov did in PHF last year. If a guy insists to be “a prisoner of his own consciousness”, he just goes in his way. That is the affair up to individual’s choice. But don’t repeatedly disturb our normal research, please. Nonsense.

Piggy got Mark here: he has understood no so called what “massless” particle in nature;
Also piggy got Jasper10 here: he has understood SELF in control;
Piggy is satisfied enough. We need positive spirit toward new research.

After tough struggle in PHF last year, piggy has formally given up the traditional conception of probability wave / matter wave. And then, all theories could be compatible. All science could be interconnected. Piggy feels very relaxing now. haha

The 4 off logic outputs are of the mind are (0,0...0,1...1,0...1,1).

There are 2 off main philosophical ideas,

1. The 0,1...1,0 (good is bad)...(bad is good) philosophy.
and
2.The 0,0..1,1 (good is good) and (bad is bad) philosophy.

As neither philosophical stance is DEFINITIVELY proven both have equal credence.

Going back to the 4 off logic outputs when it comes to the mind these logic outputs are all SUPERIMPOSED over each other.So any 0 can change to a 1 and any 1 can change to a 0 at any time (on both sides of the fence).

Is there an correlation to this principle in physics?

There is correlation in principle between physics and philosophy, always.
A simple example in this sense is the conservation of energy when an object moves in gravitational field:︱△U ︱= ︱△Ek︱. Hereby △U is the change of gravitational potential while △Ek is the change of the kinematic energy.
1. You can consider that ︱△U ︱is ︱△Ek︱or ︱△Ek︱is ︱△U ︱;
2. Also you can consider that ︱△U ︱is just ︱△U ︱while ︱△Ek︱is just ︱△Ek︱.
They are just different “consciousness” SUPERIMPOSED in the mind.

Very interesting...thanks.

There appears to be a set principle of 0,0...0,1...1,0...1,1 logic emerging as a basic template/principle that crosses science boundaries.

This cross boundary template is worth further consideration in my opinion.

All positive rather than negative as you say.

Okay, the spirit of science should be that exploration never stops its feet.
Piggy made a brief list of fun comments I gathered and put them here for reference to those guys who are willing to touch the elephant in an alternative way. Perhaps they are outstanding awareness of some scientists / scholars in the beginning of the 21st century.
……………………………………….
No. 10: Adesh’s comment in PHF: “who is eccentric?”
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/what-is-meant-by-amplitude-in-quantum-mechanics.16022/post-48831
……………………………………….
No. 9: Mark’s comment in a2k: “Absolutely!
No such thing as a 'massless' particle.

In order to occupy Any dimensional locale - Mass is, somewhat, kinda important.

Have a Lovely Journey!”


URL: https://able2know.org/topic/551152-1
……………………………………………..

(To be continued. Piggy has to prepare the relevant materials. Piggy is thinking how to dig a hole under the fence and flee to America before the First Order decides to shout “excute”…

No. 8: Woody’s comment in PHF: “…Progress is being made, but I think we are still waiting for someone to have that "Eureka" moment,
then it will be obvious that the new interpretation requires neutrons as an inescapable consequence of the nature of reality.”
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/strong-nuclear-force.15146/post-42806
Piggy’s additional comment here: Logically, if the so called “strong force” exists, nature could directly use it to overwhelm the electromagnetic force to form nuclei. Why not? And then, the existence of neutron(s) in nuclei is redundant.
But unfortunately, the existence of neutron(s) in nuclei is natural phenomenon / fact while the conception of “strong force” is just THEORY / SPECULATION / CONJECTURE.
给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代，全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵

There is a strong force when it comes to the mind...You try bringing yourself into the "in the moment" CONSCIOUSNESS state and stay there...NOT EASY....initially...it's exhausting trying to stay in the "in the moment" CONSCIOUSNESS state. It's like you are tied to a "bungee" rope...one puts CONSCIOUS energy in to force the movement of SELF from the static state "autopilot" CONSCIOUSNESS to the "in the moment" state but when you get there one can't sustain it for any long periods initially and one gets pulled back from the "in the moment" state back into the "autopilot" state. This is where the resistance factor come in. As one gets more familiar (AWARE) with this though it does get easier to stay in the "in the moment" state for longer and longer periods. There is the obvious "TOGGLING" effect that naturally comes in to play as SELF constantly drifts backwards and forwards between the 2 off consciousness states.SELF is NOT the consciousness states SELF is aware of the consciousness states.

One needs to become more and more familiar with this process that happens within the mind and the CONTROL element that SELF needs to introduce .......which takes energy input.

The so called “strong force” in standard physics theory is one fundamental natural force rather than the daily consciousness of “the force is very strong”.
……………………………………
“…their role in the stabilisation of the nucleus” seems more of an excuse than a reason because the well – known fact is that “the more neutrons the less stable the nucleus would be”.

Moreover, the “standard” so called what quark theory could not explain the following problems explicitly:
1. Why electron (without quark) carries the same amount of charge as the proton?
2. Where does the collision force between neutrons come from?
3. Where does the magnetic moment of neutron come from?
4. Why free neutron is easy to decay and why the decay of free neutron emits an electron?
5. Why neutron star can emit X ray and generates extreme strong magnetism?

All these questions should be solved in one way, the best.

No. 7: Toppy sir’s comment in PHF: “I would laugh at how lame It all sounds but it works.”
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/wavicle-an-old-topic.15202/post-47880
vs
Neila9876’s comment in PHF: “If I laugh at how lame it all sounds, I will try to find another way to understand it better, otherwise, I would not laugh at it (one rabbit in two holes. Bounce…).”
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/wavicle-an-old-topic.15202/post-48095

I have done a bit of reading up on the strong force you mention.What jumped out at me was the force required to separate quarks acting like a spring or a bungee rope.SELF experiences something similar with its interactions with consciousness states.Energy is required to separate the quarks and a release of energy is apparent as well.This is similar to the toggling experiences between consciousness states....i.e.autopilot and manual consciousness or anti autopilot and anti manual consciousness states.SELF’s CONTROL & AWARENESS of this process along with FOCUS appears to stabilise things.ALL sciences are related.

It as though the double minded (split) consciousness resides within the quarks.

positive and negative consciousness ...an interesting thought...ummmmm

When piggy feels that someone got stranded in the theoretical mud pit, even G* is not able to pull him out, what piggy can do is to give him up and go on the journey…
.....................................................
No.6: Toppy sir’s comment in PHF: “Spin 3/2 particles are known to exist... the ΞΞ and the ΔΔ have higher order states (something like excited energy levels). So experimentally we're good with the idea.”
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/find-higgs.15978/post-49083
(Piggy’s additional comment here: why spin ~ “something like excited energy levels”? experimentally…)

I agree with your first statement.AWARENESS eventually gives up on the toggling between the +ve and -ve consciousness states (autopilot/manual) which have sided with gravity.Both types of consciousness being on both sides of the fence...AWARENESS realises that it doesn’t have to be influenced by gravity at all.It has only let itself be influenced by it.Once awareness comes into this realisation then a NEUTRAL stability results.This confirms to me that AWARENESS and CONSCIOUSNESS types are different.The present understanding is that awareness and consciousness are the same.Like you say AWARENESS continues on the journey.

Therefore the stronger force is AWARENESS.

The task of physicists is to build models, employ mathematical tools, do experiments, etc, to solve specific problems of physics and astronomy.

Of course, sometimes they would bungee bungee in philosophy too. Physics is just that thing bungee bungee among philosophy, math, experiment, observation, etc, … and even conjecture.

Piggy agrees with your statement of “AWARENESS and CONSCIOUSNESS types are different”.
“Awareness” should be “觉悟” in Chinese, while “consciousness types” is just “意识形态”.
Piggy feels that “awareness” equals to “realization” in English, while “consciousness” is just “cognition”.

Piggy’s list going on should be “awareness” of those scientists / scholars. It will lead them to pursuit something new and give up something old.

The pronunciation of “bungee” sounds “笨猪stupid pig” in local Xinhui language. Haha
Have a lovely day, guys.

SELF is intrigued....in order for the core to remain stable it should only consist of neutral states with +ve and -ve states within them? This would keep the attraction/repulsion equal would it not? SELF can’t help but ask this question of AWARENESS.

It would appear that both sides of the fence have +ve and neutral potentials (1,0 or on/0ff) with the -ve interactions having the ability to change the state hence the toggling consciousness effect.

SELF is AWARE of the mind movement interactions and hence the two different consciousness states and has the ability to CONTROL the mind movement and thus the consciousness states experienced.

1 equals manual consciousness

0 equals autopilot consciousness