0
   

Teacher vs Researcher

 
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2021 01:42 am
@htam9876,
Thanks for your comments...I think it is important that all sciences (jigsaw pieces) start sharing their findings/experiences.The overall jigsaw can then be pieced together.Sciences are all interconnected.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2021 03:54 am
@htam9876,
Can I just add to your comment...….."the exploration of science is advancing into the "SELF" category...…." I would agree with this statement. It is a well know fact however that certain scientist/philosophers/psychologists/belief systems etc are very uncomfortable with this concept even the idea of "SELF" existing at all, let alone "SELF" taking on a c0ntrolling element or becoming a part of their own experiments/tests.They would prefer to keep "SELF" / "AWARENESS" out of the equation and remain "STATIC" or a "SPECTATOR" and not a "PLAYER".
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2021 06:35 pm
@Jasper10,
“I think it is important that all sciences (jigsaw pieces) start sharing their findings/experiences. The overall jigsaw can then be pieced together”
Sounds that you are talking something of the same philosophical principle as what piggy said in one post in the thread “cosmos vs us”:
“During the course of exploration, people perhaps touch the leaves of a tree first, then the sticks, and so on the stock, at last the root. But for a tree, the root is the most basic.”
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Thu 11 Mar, 2021 06:37 pm
Scientist?
The scientists in WW1 could produce tank while the scientists in WW2 could produce atomic bomb…
Last year, piggy encountered a Ukraine guy Sievrikov in PHF:
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/cold-synthesis-ball-lightning-a-brewing-scientific-revolution-online.16080/
Obviously Sievrikov was a qualified scientist. He advocated what “scientific revolution” in his thread. Piggy replied him: Don’t look forward to / wait for what revolution in physics on the Earth. Who can break through, he will command more advanced technology than others. It’s that simple.
………………………………
Actually, the most uncomfortable guy should be piggy himself, who has been deprived of all the human right and livelihood invisibly by the First Order. Only unfavorable factors are permitted by them to come to piggy’s life. What piggy can do is waiting to die in what CN. Piggy really doesn’t know when the First Order would decide to shout “execute” and then, piggy would disappear in this cosmos. Bounce… Actually, most of my time is spent on worrying the safety and prospect of my family members.
给他江门地方黑恶势力钟永康集团及新会一中九一四班谁谁一个超文革赛阎王光荣称号快快全世界全宇宙打靶啦。当今时代,全世界没有什么人能够值得如此殊荣。呵呵
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sun 14 Mar, 2021 04:53 pm
Scientist vs scientist, touchy and feely:

The fun thing is that the “authentic” scientists themselves might have different consciousness.

Below is an example in PHF when we argued whether light speed changes in gravitational field:
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/general-vs-special.16046/post-49317

Another example is the problem about “relativistic mass”. Piggy found that some scientists do not like it while some scientists employ it naturally. This problem could be solved in the “SELF” era.

The mass about neutrino is another example. Once upon a time, piggy heard a famous experimental scientist said “in the standard model, neutrino is massless, but in fact, it is has mass.”

There are many other examples. Piggy has no much time to list them all here.

Have a lovely day, guys. haha
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Mon 15 Mar, 2021 01:40 am
A crazy dog can bite a man dead, while a man can’t bite a crazy dog dead.
But seems that the crazy dog’s academic level is not necessary better than the man. haha
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/the-game-of-match-sticks.16181/post-50090
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Mar, 2021 12:54 am
A fun thing about SELF – consciousness - awareness:
Piggy bought salted big – head vegetables (大头菜) from a farmer in Junan township Shunde city this morning. That farmer called piggy “pretty boy (靓仔)”! Piggy bounced to the sky. Piggy is already 48.75 years old and aware that this (SELF) is an old pig (老猪). Piggy took a careful look at that farmer…perhaps nearly 60 years old…
Have a lovely evening, guys. haha
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Mar, 2021 10:38 am
@htam9876,
SELF is AWARE of CONSCIOUSNESS types and the fact that SELF toggles between the two (i.e, 0,1 or on/off).Both sides of the fence can be a (0 or a 1 or on or off).One can be AWARE that this is what is experienced within the mind.So it’s SELF above AWARENESS and AWARENESS above CONSCIOUSNESS types.Interestingly,the toggling logic is the same as quantum computing logic outputs when it comes to experiencing the consciousness types.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Mar, 2021 07:01 pm
@Jasper10,
At this moment, piggy wants to make clear this point:
Whether the conception of “old pig” should be decided by piggy’s SELF or by the consciousness of that farmer?
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Mar, 2021 01:24 am
@htam9876,
Both “old pig” and SELF interact.The outputs of their interactions could be as follows:

1.Both disagree that “old pig” is old.
2.SELF states that “old pig” is old but “old pig” disagrees.
3.”old pig” states that “old pig” is old but SELF disagrees.
4.Both agree that “old pig” is old.

Quantum computing logic applies the same principles i.e. 0,0...1,0...0,1...1,1

The same principles are are at play with the reasoning interactions within the mind.

If SELF asks the question of the 2 off opposite mind reasonings... does SELF exist? they can only churn out the 4 off outputs which when combined together result in a DON’T KNOW.

Most modern day philosophy only considers 1,0...0,1 logic and therefore concludes that there are no rules at play.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Mar, 2021 04:07 pm
@Jasper10,
Bounce…Sounds very profound philosophical principle.
…………………………….
Now, both agree that “old pig” is old;
The problem is that farmer disagrees…
Who should be in charge to decide whether piggy could count as an “old pig”?
SELF or the consciousness of that farmer?
https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/2/2638-fcade9968bda8c4655432960411b5c1b.jpg
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Mar, 2021 07:14 pm
Piggy meant that:
The interaction between SELF and the conception of “old pig” is one aspect (piggy’s own aspect);
While the “young pig” consciousness of that farmer is another aspect (that farmer’s aspect).
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2021 01:40 am
@htam9876,
Clearly,in the interactions of life each individual has control so piggy and the farmer each have control of their output reasonings as to the age of the farmer.These independent but still interacting output reasonings will still comply with one of the 4 possible interaction outputs when combined.When it comes to the individuals mind and specifically consciousness there is also a middle ground.The middle ground is the NEUTRAL consciousness state.The Neutral consciousness state is where the “i am” resides.The “i am” sits above SELF and AWARENESS but is impartial ...The individual needs to decide on whether one is SELF or one has a SELF.One also needs to decide if there are rules at play or not.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Sun 21 Mar, 2021 02:08 am
@Jasper10,
There is inward type meditation and there is outward type meditation.Buddhism for example only practices inward meditation and does not recognise SELF ...it only recognises consciousness.Inward/Outward meditation acknowledges both.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Mar, 2021 07:29 pm
@Jasper10,
Although there could be many different perceptions (output) about “age”, piggy consider that the affair of “age” should mainly be the physical affair of “SELF” / “I am”…
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Mar, 2021 07:30 pm
@Jasper10,
How about a “rabbitism 兔教” ?Very standard.
https://physicshelpforum.com/threads/big-rabbit-vs-small-pig.15891/
 https://physicshelpforum.com/data/attachments/3/3390-7bf709704e6610813b1950a7f9650c67.jpg
0 Replies
 
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Mar, 2021 07:32 pm
Paradox in consciousness, touchy and feely:

The twins might have different consciousness about their age in the SR, this is called the “the twins paradox”, which is still being argued in all “authentic” physics sites nowadays.
But if you are willing to enter the SELF era, this so – called paradox automatically disappear.
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Mar, 2021 01:27 am
@htam9876,
The “twins” are called autopilot and manual consciousness.

SELF is AWARE of the “twins” because SELF engages with them.They can both be found on the left and right side of the fence.Initially SELF was only familiar with autopilot who was very controlling but one day SELF was introduced to manual.

SELF decided to take CONTROL and put in effort (force) and take a trip (momentum) to see manual.There was always (resistance) to the visit by autopilot and SELF found that the visits initially were short.

The more SELF went to see manual the more independent SELF became.After a while, SELF realised that the constant backwards and forwards trips (toggling) between autopilot and manual were a problem.

SELF decided that breaking away from both twins was the way forward.

During SELF’s trips backwards and forwards to see autopilot and manual SELF became acquainted with FOCUS.

FOCUS has become a good friend of SELF.
htam9876
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Mar, 2021 05:44 pm
@Jasper10,
The fun thing is that such paradox in consciousness is also reasonable. But fortunately, it’s not the controlling element. haha
Jasper10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Mar, 2021 03:18 am
@htam9876,
Consciousness types are definitely NOT the controlling elements unless that is the individual let’s them be.

Many let consciousness types be the controlling elements however.The Buddha being just one example of someone who became a prisoner of his own consciousness.

SELF is just aware of consciousness types and the thoughts/emotions that go on within them.

SELF just experiences the effects of consciousness types but DOES HAVE the ability to control them.
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
morals and ethics, how are they different? - Question by existential potential
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 08/05/2021 at 04:24:45